Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 140

1.

Assessment of I-125 seed implant accuracy when using the live-planning technique for low dose rate prostate brachytherapy.

Moorrees J, Lawson JM, Marcu LG.

Radiat Oncol. 2012 Nov 22;7:196. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-196.

2.

Is intraoperative nomogram-based overplanning of prostate implants necessary?

D'Souza WD, Lee HK, Palmer MB, Smith LG, Pollack A.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jun 1;56(2):462-7.

PMID:
12738321
3.

Treatment technique evolution and dosimetry trends over seven years of low dose rate prostate brachytherapy at an Australian institution.

Rutten TP, Lawson JM, Marcu LG.

Phys Med. 2013 Nov;29(6):662-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Sep 10.

PMID:
22975428
4.

Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.

Raben A, Chen H, Grebler A, Geltzeiler J, Geltzeiler M, Keselman I, Litvin S, Sim S, Hanlon A, Yang J.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Dec 1;60(5):1631-8.

PMID:
15590195
5.
6.

Comparative study of permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy post-implant evaluation among seven Italian institutes.

Mangili P, Stea L, Cattani F, Lappi S, Giglioli F, Calamia E, Ziglio F, Martinelli R, Longobardi B.

Radiother Oncol. 2004 Apr;71(1):13-21.

PMID:
15066291
7.

Conformal prostate brachytherapy guided by realtime dynamic dose calculations using permanent 125iodine implants: technical description and preliminary experience.

Prada PJ, Juan G, Fernández J, González-Suárez H, Martínez A, González J, Alonso A.

Arch Esp Urol. 2006 Nov;59(9):933-40.

PMID:
17190225
8.

Prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetry: seed orientation and the impact of dosimetric anisotropy in stranded implants.

Chng N, Spadinger I, Rasoda R, Morris WJ, Salcudean S.

Med Phys. 2012 Feb;39(2):721-31. doi: 10.1118/1.3671921.

PMID:
22320782
9.

[Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].

Herein A, Ágoston P, Szabó Z, Jorgo K, Markgruber B, Pesznyák C, Polgár C, Major T.

Magy Onkol. 2015 Jun;59(2):148-53. Epub 2015 Mar 11. Hungarian.

10.

The dependence of prostate postimplant dosimetric quality on CT volume determination.

Merrick GS, Butler WM, Dorsey AT, Lief JH.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Jul 15;44(5):1111-7.

PMID:
10421545
11.

Effect of prostate size and isotope selection on dosimetric quality following permanent seed implantation.

Merrick GS, Butler WM, Dorsey AT, Lief JH.

Tech Urol. 2001 Sep;7(3):233-40.

PMID:
11575521
12.

Intraoperative dynamic dose optimization in permanent prostate implants.

Lee EK, Zaider M.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jul 1;56(3):854-61.

PMID:
12788195
13.

[Iodine-125 transperineal prostate brachytherapy with preplanning technique: pre and post-implant dosimetry results analysis].

Simonian-Sauve M, Smart C, Mailleux H, Rosello R, Bladou F, Salem N.

Cancer Radiother. 2003 Apr;7(2):90-9. French.

PMID:
12719038
14.

Placement of empty catheters for an HDR-emulating LDR prostate brachytherapy technique: comparison to standard intraoperative planning.

Niedermayr TR, Nguyen PL, Murciano-Goroff YR, Kovtun KA, Neubauer Sugar E, Cail DW, O'Farrell DA, Hansen JL, Cormack RA, Buzurovic I, Wolfsberger LT, O'Leary MP, Steele GS, Devlin PM, Orio PF 3rd.

Brachytherapy. 2014 Jul-Aug;13(4):375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

PMID:
24613569
15.

Dosimetric effects of needle divergence in prostate seed implant using 125I and 103Pd radioactive seeds.

Nath S, Chen Z, Yue N, Trumpore S, Peschel R.

Med Phys. 2000 May;27(5):1058-66.

PMID:
10841410
16.

Comparison between two iodine-125 brachytherapy implant techniques: pre-planning and intra-operative by various dosimetry quality indicators.

Matzkin H, Kaver I, Bramante-Schreiber L, Agai R, Merimsky O, Inbar M.

Radiother Oncol. 2003 Sep;68(3):289-94.

PMID:
13129637
17.

The robustness of dose distributions to displacement and migration of 125I permanent seed implants over a wide range of seed number, activity, and designs.

Beaulieu L, Archambault L, Aubin S, Oral E, Taschereau R, Pouliot J.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Mar 15;58(4):1298-308.

PMID:
15001275
18.

A comparative study of seed localization and dose calculation on pre- and post-implantation ultrasound and CT images for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

Ali I, Algan O, Thompson S, Sindhwani P, Herman T, Cheng CY, Ahmad S.

Phys Med Biol. 2009 Sep 21;54(18):5595-611. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/18/016. Epub 2009 Aug 28.

PMID:
19717887
19.

Dosimetric evaluation of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost treatments for localized prostate cancer.

Fröhlich G, Agoston P, Lövey J, Somogyi A, Fodor J, Polgár C, Major T.

Strahlenther Onkol. 2010 Jul;186(7):388-95. doi: 10.1007/s00066-010-2081-x. Epub 2010 Jun 24.

PMID:
20582396
20.
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk