Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 281

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23158595)

1.

Comparison of 3 video laryngoscopes with the Macintosh in a manikin with easy and difficult simulated airways.

Wang PK, Huang CC, Lee Y, Chen TY, Lai HY.

Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;31(2):330-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.08.026. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

PMID:
23158595
2.

A comparison of the Glidescope, Pentax AWS, and Macintosh laryngoscopes when used by novice personnel: a manikin study.

Malik MA, Hassett P, Carney J, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG.

Can J Anaesth. 2009 Nov;56(11):802-11. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9165-z. Epub 2009 Aug 5.

PMID:
19655213
3.

Comparison of the Glidescope, the Pentax AWS, and the Truview EVO2 with the Macintosh laryngoscope in experienced anaesthetists: a manikin study.

Malik MA, O'Donoghue C, Carney J, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG.

Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jan;102(1):128-34. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen342.

4.

Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins.

McElwain J, Malik MA, Harte BH, Flynn NM, Laffey JG.

Anaesthesia. 2010 May;65(5):483-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06307.x. Epub 2010 Mar 19.

PMID:
20337620
5.

Comparing the performance of traditional direct laryngoscope with three indirect laryngoscopes: A prospective manikin study in normal and difficult airway scenarios.

Ong JR, Chong CF, Chen CC, Wang TL, Lin CM, Chang SC.

Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Oct;23(5):606-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01441.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.

PMID:
21995476
7.

Evaluation of the Airway Scope, a new video laryngoscope, in tracheal intubation by naive operators: a manikin study.

Miki T, Inagawa G, Kikuchi T, Koyama Y, Goto T.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Nov;51(10):1378-81.

PMID:
17944642
8.

Utility of the Pentax-AWS without interruption of chest compression: comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope with the Pentax-AWS in manikin model.

Han SK, Shin DH, Choi PC.

Resuscitation. 2010 Jan;81(1):69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.09.031. Epub 2009 Nov 17.

PMID:
19919888
10.

Tracheal intubation of a difficult airway using Airway Scope, Airtraq, and Macintosh laryngoscope: a comparative manikin study of inexperienced personnel.

Liu L, Tanigawa K, Kusunoki S, Tamura T, Ota K, Yamaga S, Kida Y, Otani T, Sadamori T, Takeda T, Iwasaki Y, Hirohashi N.

Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110(4):1049-55. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d2aad7.

PMID:
20357149
11.

Comparison of the Pentax AWS videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated difficult airway intubations by emergency physicians.

Phillips S, Celenza A.

Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;29(8):863-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.03.024. Epub 2010 May 1.

PMID:
20825915
12.

Ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Airway Scope by novice operators in simulated easy and difficult airways--a manikin study.

Tan BH, Liu EH, Lim RT, Liow LM, Goy RW.

Anaesthesia. 2009 Feb;64(2):187-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05753.x.

PMID:
19143697
13.

Comparison of the Glidescope and Pentax AWS laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by advanced paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation.

Nasim S, Maharaj CH, Malik MA, O' Donnell J, Higgins BD, Laffey JG.

BMC Emerg Med. 2009 May 17;9:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-9-9.

14.

Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization.

Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG.

Br J Anaesth. 2008 Nov;101(5):723-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen231. Epub 2008 Sep 9.

15.

Evaluation of new laryngoscope blade for tracheal intubation, Truview EVO2: a manikin study.

Miceli L, Cecconi M, Tripi G, Zauli M, Della Rocca G.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Jun;25(6):446-9. doi: 10.1017/S0265021508003657. Epub 2008 Feb 25.

PMID:
18294407
16.

Comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated tracheal intubation scenarios.

Kim HJ, Chung SP, Park IC, Cho J, Lee HS, Park YS.

Emerg Med J. 2008 May;25(5):279-82. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.052803.

PMID:
18434462
17.

Evaluation of the new Viewmax laryngoscope in a simulated difficult airway.

Leung YY, Hung CT, Tan ST.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 May;50(5):562-7.

PMID:
16643225
18.

A mannequin study of intubation with the AP advance and GlideScope Ranger videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope.

Hodd JA, Doyle DJ, Gupta S, Dalton JE, Cata JP, Brewer EJ, James M, Sessler DI.

Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):791-800. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182288bda. Epub 2011 Sep 2.

PMID:
21890882
19.

Comparison of the king vision video laryngoscope with the macintosh laryngoscope.

Murphy LD, Kovacs GJ, Reardon PM, Law JA.

J Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;47(2):239-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Apr 16.

PMID:
24742495
20.

Can the new McGrath laryngoscope rival the GlideScope Ranger portable video laryngoscope? A randomized manikin study.

Kim W, Choi HJ, Lim T, Kang BS.

Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;32(10):1225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.07.034. Epub 2014 Aug 2.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk