Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 152

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23158120)

1.
2.

Adjacent-level cervical ossification after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Garrido BJ, Wilhite J, Nakano M, Crawford C, Baldus C, Riew KD, Sasso RC.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jul 6;93(13):1185-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00029.

PMID:
21776570
3.

Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.

Sasso RC, Best NM.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Feb;21(1):19-22. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180500778.

PMID:
18418131
4.

[Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].

Zencica P, Chaloupka R, Hladíková J, Krbec M.

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Apr;77(2):124-30. Czech.

PMID:
20447355
5.

Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.

Kim SW, Limson MA, Kim SB, Arbatin JJ, Chang KY, Park MS, Shin JH, Ju YS.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Feb;18(2):218-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0854-z. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

6.

Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages.

Elsawaf A, Mastronardi L, Roperto R, Bozzao A, Caroli M, Ferrante L.

Neurosurg Rev. 2009 Apr;32(2):215-24; discussion 224. doi: 10.1007/s10143-008-0164-2. Epub 2008 Oct 10.

PMID:
18846395
7.

Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.

Sasso RC, Best NM, Metcalf NH, Anderson PA.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Aug;21(6):393-9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318150d121.

PMID:
18679092
8.

Cervical disc arthroplasty with ProDisc-C artificial disc: 5-year radiographic follow-up results.

Zhao YB, Sun Y, Zhou FF, Liu ZJ.

Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Oct;126(20):3809-11.

PMID:
24157136
9.

Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial.

Kelly MP, Mok JM, Frisch RF, Tay BK.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jul 1;36(15):1171-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ec5c7d.

PMID:
21217449
10.

Is cervical disc arthroplasty superior to fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease? A meta-analysis.

Yin S, Yu X, Zhou S, Yin Z, Qiu Y.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jun;471(6):1904-19. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2830-0. Epub 2013 Feb 7.

11.

Kinematics of the cervical adjacent segments after disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Hipp J, Norvell DC, Raich A, Hashimoto R.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 15;37(22 Suppl):S85-95. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d6628. Review.

PMID:
22885834
12.

[The application of cervical spine arthroplasty with Bryan disc and mid-term clinical and radiological follow-up results].

Sun Y, Zhao YB, Zhou FF, Liu ZJ.

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Mar 1;46(5):333-7. Chinese.

PMID:
18785526
13.

Differences between 1- and 2-level cervical arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification in 2-level disc replacement: Clinical article.

Wu JC, Huang WC, Tsai HW, Ko CC, Fay LY, Tu TH, Wu CL, Cheng H.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jun;16(6):594-600. doi: 10.3171/2012.2.SPINE111066. Epub 2012 Mar 23.

PMID:
22443547
14.

Radiologically documented adjacent-segment degeneration after cervical arthroplasty: characteristics and review of cases.

Yi S, Lee DY, Ahn PG, Kim KN, Yoon DH, Shin HC.

Surg Neurol. 2009 Oct;72(4):325-9; discussion 329. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Aug 7.

PMID:
19665192
15.

An analysis of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: a novel morphologic classification of an ossified mass.

Jin YJ, Park SB, Kim MJ, Kim KJ, Kim HJ.

Spine J. 2013 Apr;13(4):408-20. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.048. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

PMID:
23332520
17.

Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, Heller JG.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Sep 21;93(18):1684-92. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00476.

PMID:
21938372
18.
19.

Quality of spinal motion with cervical disk arthroplasty: computer-aided radiographic analysis.

Powell JW, Sasso RC, Metcalf NH, Anderson PA, Hipp JA.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Apr;23(2):89-95. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181991413.

PMID:
20051921
20.

Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up.

Garrido BJ, Taha TA, Sasso RC.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Aug;23(6):367-71. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181bb8568.

PMID:
20087223
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk