Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 97

1.

Comparing statistics for objective detection of transient and steady-state evoked responses in newborns.

Mijares E, Pérez Abalo MC, Herrera D, Lage A, Vega M.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Jan;52(1):44-9. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.736030. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

PMID:
23153253
2.

Test accuracy and prognostic validity of multiple auditory steady state responses for targeted hearing screening.

Savio G, Perez-Abalo MC, Gaya J, Hernandez O, Mijares E.

Int J Audiol. 2006 Feb;45(2):109-20.

PMID:
16566249
3.

Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.

Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Widen JE, Folsom RC, Sininger Y, Cone-Wesson B, Vohr BR, Mascher K, Fletcher K.

Ear Hear. 2000 Oct;21(5):508-28.

PMID:
11059707
4.

[Newborn hearing screening test with multiple auditory steady-state responses].

Mijares Nodarse E, Herrera Alonso D, Gaya Vázquez J, Santos Febles E, Pérez Abalo MC, Mendez Alarcón L, Robertson Terry R.

Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2011 Mar-Apr;62(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2010.10.005. Epub 2011 Jan 6. Spanish.

5.

Detectability of newborn chirp-evoked ABR in the frequency domain at different stimulus rates.

Cebulla M, Stürzebecher E.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Oct;52(10):698-705. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.804634. Epub 2013 Jun 28.

PMID:
23808682
6.

The low and high frequency auditory steady state responses mature at different rates.

Savio G, Cárdenas J, Pérez Abalo M, González A, Valdés J.

Audiol Neurootol. 2001 Sep-Oct;6(5):279-87.

PMID:
11729330
7.

Automated auditory response detection: Improvement of the statistical test strategy.

Stürzebecher E, Cebulla M.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Dec;52(12):861-4. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.822995.

PMID:
24219121
8.

The effect of varying stimulus phase between frequency and amplitude modulation on auditory steady-state responses in neonates.

Brennan SK, Brooke RE, Stevens JC.

Int J Audiol. 2012 Feb;51(2):116-23. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.617392. Epub 2011 Dec 1.

PMID:
22133062
9.

Comparison of ABR response amplitude, test time, and estimation of hearing threshold using frequency specific chirp and tone pip stimuli in newborns.

Ferm I, Lightfoot G, Stevens J.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Jun;52(6):419-23. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.769280. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

PMID:
23448103
10.

ABR in newborns: effects of electrode configuration, stimulus rate, and EEG rejection levels on test efficiency.

Stevens J, Brennan S, Gratton D, Campbell M.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Oct;52(10):706-12. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.809482. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

PMID:
23902521
11.

Automated auditory response detection: Further improvement of the statistical test strategy by using progressive test steps of iteration.

Cebulla M, Stürzebecher E.

Int J Audiol. 2015 Aug;54(8):568-72. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1017659. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

PMID:
25831956
12.

Comparison of auditory-evoked potential detection methods using signal detection theory.

Valdes-Sosa MJ, Bobes MA, Perez-Abalo MC, Perera M, Carballo JA, Valdes-Sosa P.

Audiology. 1987;26(3):166-78.

PMID:
3662940
13.

Predictive value of hearing assessment by the auditory brainstem response following universal newborn hearing screening.

Stevens J, Boul A, Lear S, Parker G, Ashall-Kelly K, Gratton D.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Jul;52(7):500-6. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.776180. Epub 2013 Apr 25.

PMID:
23617611
14.

Comparison of two hearing screening programs in the same population: oto-acoustic emissions (OAE) screening in newborns and behavioral screening when infants.

Geal-Dor M, Adelman C, Levi H, Zentner G, Stein-Zamir C.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Dec;74(12):1351-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.08.023. Epub 2010 Sep 24.

PMID:
20869779
15.

The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program.

Kirkim G, Serbetcioglu B, Erdag TK, Ceryan K.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Oct;72(10):1461-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.06.010. Epub 2008 Jul 31.

PMID:
18674822
16.

Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.

Baldwin M, Watkin P.

Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):361-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182728b88.

PMID:
23340456
17.

MB11 BERAphone and auditory brainstem response in newborns at audiologic risk: comparison of results.

Melagrana A, Casale S, Calevo MG, Tarantino V.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Aug;71(8):1175-80. Epub 2007 May 29.

PMID:
17532479
18.

Testing time comparison between two procedures with new technologies of Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR).

Sena TA, Ramos N, Rodrigues GR, Lewis DR.

Codas. 2013;25(1):34-8. English, Portuguese.

19.

Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state responses.

Valdes JL, Perez-Abalo MC, Martin V, Savio G, Sierra C, Rodriguez E, Lins O.

Ear Hear. 1997 Oct;18(5):420-9.

PMID:
9360865
20.

The influence of the detection paradigm in recording auditory steady-state responses.

Luts H, Van Dun B, Alaerts J, Wouters J.

Ear Hear. 2008 Aug;29(4):638-50. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318174f051.

PMID:
18469712
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk