Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time.

Lazard DS, Vincent C, Venail F, Van de Heyning P, Truy E, Sterkers O, Skarzynski PH, Skarzynski H, Schauwers K, O'Leary S, Mawman D, Maat B, Kleine-Punte A, Huber AM, Green K, Govaerts PJ, Fraysse B, Dowell R, Dillier N, Burke E, Beynon A, Bergeron F, Başkent D, Artières F, Blamey PJ.

PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048739. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

PMID:
23152797
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients.

Blamey P, Artieres F, Başkent D, Bergeron F, Beynon A, Burke E, Dillier N, Dowell R, Fraysse B, Gallégo S, Govaerts PJ, Green K, Huber AM, Kleine-Punte A, Maat B, Marx M, Mawman D, Mosnier I, O'Connor AF, O'Leary S, Rousset A, Schauwers K, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski PH, Sterkers O, Terranti A, Truy E, Van de Heyning P, Venail F, Vincent C, Lazard DS.

Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(1):36-47. doi: 10.1159/000343189. Epub 2012 Oct 19.

PMID:
23095305
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model.

Bond M, Mealing S, Anderson R, Elston J, Weiner G, Taylor RS, Hoyle M, Liu Z, Price A, Stein K.

Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(44):1-330. doi: 10.3310/hta13440. Review.

PMID:
19799825
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
4.

The influence of various factors on the performance of repetition tests in adults with cochlear implants.

Moon IJ, Kim EY, Jeong JO, Chung WH, Cho YS, Hong SH.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Mar;269(3):739-45. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1699-3. Epub 2011 Jul 8.

PMID:
21739091
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.

Cosetti MK, Friedmann DR, Zhu BZ, Heman-Ackah SE, Fang Y, Keller RG, Shapiro WH, Roland JT Jr, Waltzman SB.

Otol Neurotol. 2013 Apr;34(3):516-21. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182785210.

PMID:
23449440
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.

Peters BR, Litovsky R, Parkinson A, Lake J.

Otol Neurotol. 2007 Aug;28(5):649-57.

PMID:
17712290
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.

Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Stecker M, Müller-Deile J, Maune S, Dillier N, Weber B, Hey M, Begall K, Lenarz T, Battmer RD, Böhm M, Steffens T, Strutz J, Linder T, Probst R, Allum J, Westhofen M, Doering W.

Otol Neurotol. 2004 Nov;25(6):958-68.

PMID:
15547426
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.

Wolfe J, Baker S, Caraway T, Kasulis H, Mears A, Smith J, Swim L, Wood M.

Otol Neurotol. 2007 Aug;28(5):589-96.

PMID:
17667768
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, Holden TA, Brenner C, Potts LG, Gotter BD, Vanderhoof SS, Mispagel K, Heydebrand G, Skinner MW.

Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):342-60. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7.

PMID:
23348845
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
10.

Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value.

Rotteveel LJ, Snik AF, Vermeulen AM, Cremers CW, Mylanus EA.

Clin Otolaryngol. 2008 Dec;33(6):560-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01833.x.

PMID:
19126130
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4-year time period.

Oh SH, Kim CS, Kang EJ, Lee DS, Lee HJ, Chang SO, Ahn SH, Hwang CH, Park HJ, Koo JW.

Acta Otolaryngol. 2003 Jan;123(2):148-53.

PMID:
12701730
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children.

Colletti L.

Acta Otolaryngol. 2007 Sep;127(9):943-6.

PMID:
17712673
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.

Galvin KL, Mok M, Dowell RC.

Ear Hear. 2007 Aug;28(4):470-82.

PMID:
17609610
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why.

James C, Albegger K, Battmer R, Burdo S, Deggouj N, Deguine O, Dillier N, Gersdorff M, Laszig R, Lenarz T, Rodriguez MM, Mondain M, Offeciers E, Macías AR, Ramsden R, Sterkers O, Von Wallenberg E, Weber B, Fraysse B.

Acta Otolaryngol. 2005 May;125(5):481-91.

PMID:
16092537
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Cochlear implant outcomes in adults and adolescents with early-onset hearing loss.

Caposecco A, Hickson L, Pedley K.

Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):209-20. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822eb16c.

PMID:
21934504
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance.

Friedland DR, Venick HS, Niparko JK.

Otol Neurotol. 2003 Jul;24(4):582-9.

PMID:
12851549
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.

Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Matusiak M, Porowski M, Skarzynski PH, James CJ.

Audiol Neurootol. 2012;17(2):82-91. doi: 10.1159/000329366. Epub 2011 Aug 12.

PMID:
21846981
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Comparison of cochlear implant performance after round window electrode insertion compared with traditional cochleostomy.

Kang BJ, Kim AH.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 May;148(5):822-6. doi: 10.1177/0194599813479576. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

PMID:
23447485
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Improved auditory performance of cochlear implant patients using the middle fossa approach.

Colletti V, Fiorino FG, Saccetto L, Giarbini N, Carner M.

Audiology. 1999 Jul-Aug;38(4):225-34.

PMID:
10431908
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception.

Yukawa K, Cohen L, Blamey P, Pyman B, Tungvachirakul V, O'Leary S.

Audiol Neurootol. 2004 May-Jun;9(3):163-72.

PMID:
15084821
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk