Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 142

Related Citations for PubMed (Select 23146651)

1.

Canal and isthmus debridement efficacy of the VPro EndoSafe negative-pressure irrigation technique.

Sarno MU, Sidow SJ, Looney SW, Lindsey KW, Niu LN, Tay FR.

J Endod. 2012 Dec;38(12):1631-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

PMID:
23146651
2.

Canal and isthmus debridement efficacy using a sonic irrigation technique in a closed-canal system.

Johnson M, Sidow SJ, Looney SW, Lindsey K, Niu LN, Tay FR.

J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1265-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

PMID:
22892748
3.

Histologic evaluation of canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two different irrigant delivery techniques in a closed system.

Adcock JM, Sidow SJ, Looney SW, Liu Y, McNally K, Lindsey K, Tay FR.

J Endod. 2011 Apr;37(4):544-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.01.006.

PMID:
21419306
4.

Comparison of a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device and conventional needle irrigation in the removal of root canal debris.

Curtis TO, Sedgley CM.

J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1261-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Jun 30.

PMID:
22892747
5.

Canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two irrigant agitation techniques in a closed system.

Susin L, Liu Y, Yoon JC, Parente JM, Loushine RJ, Ricucci D, Bryan T, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR.

Int Endod J. 2010 Dec;43(12):1077-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01778.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.

6.

Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars.

Paqué F, Al-Jadaa A, Kfir A.

Int Endod J. 2012 May;45(5):413-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01991.x. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

PMID:
22188277
7.

Root canal debridement using manual dynamic agitation or the EndoVac for final irrigation in a closed system and an open system.

Parente JM, Loushine RJ, Susin L, Gu L, Looney SW, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR.

Int Endod J. 2010 Nov;43(11):1001-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01755.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.

PMID:
20722753
8.

A comparative study of the debridement efficacy and apical extrusion of dynamic and passive root canal irrigation systems.

Alkahtani A, Al Khudhairi TD, Anil S.

BMC Oral Health. 2014 Feb 11;14:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-12.

9.

Root canal debris removal using different irrigating needles: an SEM study.

Ghivari S, Kubasad G.

Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Sep-Oct;22(5):659-63. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.93452.

10.
11.

Efficacy of irrigation systems on penetration of sodium hypochlorite to working length and to simulated uninstrumented areas in oval shaped root canals.

de Gregorio C, Paranjpe A, Garcia A, Navarrete N, Estevez R, Esplugues EO, Cohenca N.

Int Endod J. 2012 May;45(5):475-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01999.x. Epub 2012 Jan 27.

PMID:
22283697
12.

Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.

Caron G, Nham K, Bronnec F, Machtou P.

J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 13.

PMID:
20647097
13.

Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.

Adigüzel O, Yiğit-Özer S, Kaya S, Uysal İ, Ganidağli-Ayaz S, Akkuş Z.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Dec;112(6):803-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.038. Epub 2011 Aug 27.

PMID:
21873086
14.

Micro-CT analyses of apical enlargement and molar root canal complexity.

Markvart M, Darvann TA, Larsen P, Dalstra M, Kreiborg S, Bjørndal L.

Int Endod J. 2012 Mar;45(3):273-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01972.x. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

PMID:
22044111
15.

Efficacy of the NaviTip FX irrigation needle in removing post instrumentation canal smear layer and debris in curved root canals.

Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Serrano SA, Palo RM, Iglesias EF.

J Endod. 2009 Sep;35(9):1270-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 Jun 28.

PMID:
19720229
16.

In vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars.

Munoz HR, Camacho-Cuadra K.

J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):445-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

PMID:
22414827
17.

SEM evaluation of root canal debridement with Sonicare CanalBrush irrigation.

Salman MI, Baumann MA, Hellmich M, Roggendorf MJ, Termaat S.

Int Endod J. 2010 May;43(5):363-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01675.x.

PMID:
20518928
18.

Efficacy and safety of various active irrigation devices when used with either positive or negative pressure: an in vitro study.

Malentacca A, Uccioli U, Zangari D, Lajolo C, Fabiani C.

J Endod. 2012 Dec;38(12):1622-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.009. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

PMID:
23146649
19.

One- versus two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study.

Vera J, Siqueira JF Jr, Ricucci D, Loghin S, Fernández N, Flores B, Cruz AG.

J Endod. 2012 Aug;38(8):1040-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.010. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

PMID:
22794203
20.

Cleaning efficacy of an apical negative-pressure irrigation system at different exposure times.

Heilborn C, Reynolds K, Johnson JD, Cohenca N.

Quintessence Int. 2010 Oct;41(9):759-67.

PMID:
20806100
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk