Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 416

1.

Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.

Li X, Nie K, Imennov NS, Won JH, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT, Atlas LE.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):3387-98. doi: 10.1121/1.4756827.

2.

Improved perception of music with a harmonic based algorithm for cochlear implants.

Li X, Nie K, Imennov NS, Rubinstein JT, Atlas LE.

IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013 Jul;21(4):684-94. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2257853. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

PMID:
23613083
3.

The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.

Chen F, Wong LL, Tahmina Q, Azimi B, Hu Y.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):EL142-8. doi: 10.1121/1.4737595.

PMID:
22894313
4.

Concurrent-vowel and tone recognitions in acoustic and simulated electric hearing.

Luo X, Fu QJ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 May;125(5):3223-33. doi: 10.1121/1.3106534.

5.

Combined spectral and temporal enhancement to improve cochlear-implant speech perception.

Bhattacharya A, Vandali A, Zeng FG.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):2951-60. doi: 10.1121/1.3641401.

6.

Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Goldsworthy RL, Delhorne LA, Braida LD, Reed CM.

Trends Amplif. 2013 Mar;17(1):27-44. doi: 10.1177/1084713813477244. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

7.

Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.

Li T, Fu QJ.

Int J Audiol. 2011 Aug;50(8):498-502. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.576274. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

8.

Musician effect in cochlear implant simulated gender categorization.

Fuller CD, Galvin JJ 3rd, Free RH, Ba┼čkent D.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Mar;135(3):EL159-65. doi: 10.1121/1.4865263. Erratum in: J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jun;135(6):3641.

9.

The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.

Koning R, Wouters J.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Oct;132(4):2569-81. doi: 10.1121/1.4748965.

PMID:
23039450
10.

Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Carroll J, Tiaden S, Zeng FG.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):2054-62. doi: 10.1121/1.3631563.

11.

Pitch strength of noise-vocoded harmonic tone complexes in normal-hearing listeners.

Shofner WP, Campbell J.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):EL398-404. doi: 10.1121/1.4757697.

12.

Comparison of Mandarin tone and speech perception between advanced combination encoder and continuous interleaved sampling speech-processing strategies in children.

Hwang CF, Chen HC, Yang CH, Peng JP, Weng CH.

Am J Otolaryngol. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):338-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2011.08.011. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

PMID:
21982716
13.

The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.

Anderson MC, Arehart KH, Kates JM.

Hear Res. 2014 Mar;309:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

PMID:
24333929
15.

Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise.

Mc Laughlin M, Reilly RB, Zeng FG.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Mar;133(3):1546-60. doi: 10.1121/1.4789940.

16.

Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.

Fink N, Furst M, Muchnik C.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Sep;132(3):1718-31. doi: 10.1121/1.4739441.

PMID:
22978899
17.

Mandarin speech-in-noise and tone recognition using vocoder simulations of the temporal limits encoder for cochlear implants.

Meng Q, Zheng N, Li X.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Jan;139(1):301-10. doi: 10.1121/1.4939707.

PMID:
26827026
18.
19.

Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Aug;110(2):1150-63.

PMID:
11519582
20.

Effects of spectral shifting on speech perception in noise.

Li T, Fu QJ.

Hear Res. 2010 Dec 1;270(1-2):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.09.005. Epub 2010 Sep 22.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk