Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 94

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23112315)

1.

Science and society. Social media and the elections.

Metaxas PT, Mustafaraj E.

Science. 2012 Oct 26;338(6106):472-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1230456. No abstract available.

PMID:
23112315
2.

How to implement a social media strategy in five hours a month.

[No authors listed]

EMS World. 2014 May;43(5):32, 34-6. No abstract available.

PMID:
24937913
3.

More tweets, more votes: social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior.

Digrazia J, McKelvey K, Bollen J, Rojas F.

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e79449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079449. eCollection 2013.

4.

Presentations offer insight on social media for physicians.

Bottles K, Kim J.

Physician Exec. 2013 May-Jun;39(3):92-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
23802395
5.

Microblogging: tumblr and pinterest.

Duffy M.

Am J Nurs. 2013 Jun;113(6):61-4. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000431274.68030.90. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
23702769
6.

Response to open peer commentaries on "Surrogate decision making in the internet age".

Berg J.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):W1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.712417. No abstract available.

PMID:
22974042
7.

Considerations in surrogate decision making in the internet age.

Tsai NT.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):51. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.711900. No abstract available.

PMID:
22974038
8.

Are we prepared for surrogate decision making in the internet age?

Moore JA, Gallagher CM.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):47-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.708093. No abstract available.

PMID:
22974036
9.

Social media as a contributor to substituted judgment: the hazards outweigh the value.

Sadovnikoff N, Jurchak M.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):45-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.708091. No abstract available.

PMID:
22974035
10.

Facebook can improve surrogate decision making.

Pope TM.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):43-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.708095. No abstract available.

PMID:
22974034
11.

Claims about surrogate decision-making accuracy require empirical evidence.

Feltz A, Abt T.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):41-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.708090. No abstract available.

PMID:
22974033
12.

The self, social media, and social construction.

Stark M, Fins JJ.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):38-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.708094. No abstract available.

PMID:
22974031
13.

A disability response to surrogate decision making in the internet age.

Burke TB.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):36-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.711899. No abstract available.

PMID:
22974030
14.

Surrogate decision making 2.0: digital evidence as clinical testimony.

Wahlert L.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):34-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.708096. No abstract available.

PMID:
22974029
15.

Surrogate decision making in the internet age.

Berg J.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):28-33. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.708088.

PMID:
22974028
16.

Federal elections, the economy and healthcare. Much for executives to consider between now and November.

Ferman JH.

Healthc Exec. 2012 Jul-Aug;27(4):58-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
22852204
17.

Apocalypse now?

Petsko GA.

Genome Biol. 2012;13(3):151. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-3-151. No abstract available.

18.

(De)centralization of social support in six Western European countries.

Kroneman M, Cardol M, Friele R.

Health Policy. 2012 Jun;106(1):76-87. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Mar 29. Review.

PMID:
22464591
19.

Decision day on docket for ACA challenges.

[No authors listed]

Mod Healthc. 2011 Dec 19-26;41(51):25. No abstract available.

PMID:
22359748
20.
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk