Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 114

1.

Changes in Cesarean section scar dimensions during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study.

Naji O, Daemen A, Smith A, Abdallah Y, Saso S, Stalder C, Sayasneh A, McIndoe A, Ghaem-Maghami S, Timmerman D, Bourne T.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;41(5):556-62. doi: 10.1002/uog.12334.

PMID:
23108803
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Visibility and measurement of cesarean section scars in pregnancy: a reproducibility study.

Naji O, Daemen A, Smith A, Abdallah Y, Saso S, Stalder C, Sayasneh A, McIndoe A, Ghaem-Maghami S, Timmerman D, Bourne T.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;40(5):549-56. doi: 10.1002/uog.11132.

PMID:
22323065
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
3.

Predicting successful vaginal birth after Cesarean section using a model based on Cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography.

Naji O, Wynants L, Smith A, Abdallah Y, Stalder C, Sayasneh A, McIndoe A, Ghaem-Maghami S, Van Huffel S, Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Bourne T.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;41(6):672-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.12423.

PMID:
23371440
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Ultrasound evaluation of Cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study.

Glavind J, Madsen LD, Uldbjerg N, Dueholm M.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;42(2):207-12. doi: 10.1002/uog.12376.

PMID:
23288683
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Does the presence of a Caesarean section scar affect implantation site and early pregnancy outcome in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit?

Naji O, Wynants L, Smith A, Abdallah Y, Saso S, Stalder C, Van Huffel S, Ghaem-Maghami S, Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Bourne T.

Hum Reprod. 2013 Jun;28(6):1489-96. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det110. Epub 2013 Apr 12.

PMID:
23585560
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
6.

Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound.

Klemm P, Koehler C, Mangler M, Schneider U, Schneider A.

J Perinat Med. 2005;33(4):324-31.

PMID:
16207118
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar.

Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Mar;21(3):220-7.

PMID:
12666214
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
8.

Is gestational age an independent variable affecting uterine scar rupture rates?

Kiran TS, Chui YK, Bethel J, Bhal PS.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 May 1;126(1):68-71. Epub 2005 Oct 10.

PMID:
16221523
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Subsequent pregnancy outcome after conservative treatment of a previous cesarean scar pregnancy.

Seow KM, Hwang JL, Tsai YL, Huang LW, Lin YH, Hsieh BC.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Dec;83(12):1167-72.

PMID:
15548150
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Predicting incomplete uterine rupture with vaginal sonography during the late second trimester in women with prior cesarean.

Gotoh H, Masuzaki H, Yoshida A, Yoshimura S, Miyamura T, Ishimaru T.

Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Apr;95(4):596-600.

PMID:
10725496
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

First-trimester diagnosis of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.

Moschos E, Sreenarasimhaiah S, Twickler DM.

J Clin Ultrasound. 2008 Oct;36(8):504-11. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20471.

PMID:
18393379
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination.

Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;34(1):90-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.6395.

PMID:
19499514
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
13.

Sonographic imaging of cervical scars after Cesarean section.

Zimmer EZ, Bardin R, Tamir A, Bronshtein M.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;23(6):594-8.

PMID:
15170802
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
14.

Early second trimester uterine scar rupture.

Bharatnur S, Hebbar S, Shyamala G.

BMJ Case Rep. 2013 Dec 10;2013. pii: bcr2013200960. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-200960.

PMID:
24326433
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Comparison of scar thickness measurements using trans-vaginal sonography and MRI in cases of pregnancy with previous caesarean section. Do they correlate with actual scar thickness?

Singh N, Tripathi R, Mala YM, Dixit R, Tyagi S, Batra A.

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Nov;33(8):810-3. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.823926.

PMID:
24219719
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Midtrimester uterine rupture. A case report.

Levrant SG, Wingate M.

J Reprod Med. 1996 Mar;41(3):186-90. Review.

PMID:
8778419
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Sonographic diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy at 16 weeks.

Smith A, Ash A, Maxwell D.

J Clin Ultrasound. 2007 May;35(4):212-5.

PMID:
17366559
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors.

Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E, Yazbek J, Lee C, Gonzalez J, Jurkovic D.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;31(1):72-7.

PMID:
18061960
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
19.

Prediction of scar integrity and vaginal birth after caesarean delivery.

Valentin L.

Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr;27(2):285-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Oct 24. Review.

PMID:
23103207
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women.

Vikhareva Osser O, Valentin L.

Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):525-32. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318209abf0.

PMID:
21343754
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk