Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 100

1.

Episodic retrieval and decaying inhibition in the competitor-rule suppression phenomenon.

Hsieh S, Chang CC, Meiran N.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Nov;141(3):316-21. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

PMID:
23085143
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

The dissipating task-repetition benefit in cued task switching: task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness?

Horoufchin H, Philipp AM, Koch I.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Apr;37(2):455-72. doi: 10.1037/a0020557.

PMID:
20853997
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Temporal distinctiveness and repetition benefits in task switching: disentangling stimulus-related and response-related contributions.

Horoufchin H, Philipp AM, Koch I.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Mar;64(3):434-46. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.496857. Epub 2010 Aug 2.

PMID:
20680886
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Resolving task rule incongruence during task switching by competitor rule suppression.

Meiran N, Hsieh S, Dimov E.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):992-1002. doi: 10.1037/a0019761.

PMID:
20565214
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

"Smart inhibition": electrophysiological evidence for the suppression of conflict-generating task rules during task switching.

Meiran N, Hsieh S, Chang CC.

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Sep;11(3):292-308. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0037-y.

PMID:
21590505
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Can time-based decay explain temporal distinctiveness effects in task switching?

Grange JA, Cross E.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 Jul 16:1-27. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25028178
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
7.

Precueing imminent conflict does not override sequence-dependent interference adaptation.

Alpay G, Goerke M, Stürmer B.

Psychol Res. 2009 Nov;73(6):803-16. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0196-9. Epub 2008 Nov 26.

PMID:
19034499
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Task conflict effect in task switching.

Braverman A, Meiran N.

Psychol Res. 2010 Nov;74(6):568-78. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0279-2. Epub 2010 Mar 23.

PMID:
20309709
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict.

Kiesel A, Kunde W, Hoffmann J.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):800-6.

PMID:
17328376
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Linking inhibition to activation in the control of task sequences.

Gade M, Koch I.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Jun;12(3):530-4.

PMID:
16235641
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Testing probability matching and episodic retrieval accounts of response repetition effects in task switching.

Altmann EM.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):935-51. doi: 10.1037/a0022931.

PMID:
21728467
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Generic cognitive adaptations to task interference in task switching.

Poljac E, Bekkering H.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Nov;132(3):279-85. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.07.012. Epub 2009 Sep 4.

PMID:
19733342
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Abnormal negative feedback processing in first episode schizophrenia: evidence from an oculomotor rule switching task.

Huddy VC, Hodgson TL, Ron MA, Barnes TR, Joyce EM.

Psychol Med. 2011 Sep;41(9):1805-14. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710002527. Epub 2011 Jan 7.

PMID:
21211097
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
14.

Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.

Smith JL, Smith EA, Provost AL, Heathcote A.

Int J Psychophysiol. 2010 Mar;75(3):217-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Dec 3.

PMID:
19951723
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

The representational locus of spatial influence on backward inhibition.

Arbuthnott KD.

Mem Cognit. 2009 Jun;37(4):522-8. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.4.522.

PMID:
19460958
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

The role of inhibition in task switching: a review.

Koch I, Gade M, Schuch S, Philipp AM.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Feb;17(1):1-14. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.1. Review.

PMID:
20081154
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Inhibition, interference, and conflict in task switching.

Costa RE, Friedrich FJ.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1193-201. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0311-1.

PMID:
22918561
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching.

Grange JA, Houghton G.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):1003-9. doi: 10.1037/a0019129.

PMID:
20565215
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Task switching with a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping: separating cue disambiguation from task-rule retrieval.

Kleinsorge T.

Psychol Res. 2012 May;76(3):329-35. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0344-5. Epub 2011 May 27.

PMID:
21617987
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

An electrophysiological study of response conflict processing across the lifespan: assessing the roles of conflict monitoring, cue utilization, response anticipation, and response suppression.

Hämmerer D, Li SC, Müller V, Lindenberger U.

Neuropsychologia. 2010 Sep;48(11):3305-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.014. Epub 2010 Jul 16.

PMID:
20638396
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk