Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 93

1.

Tips and techniques in breast MRI.

Thomassin-Naggara I, Trop I, Lalonde L, David J, Péloquin L, Chopier J.

Diagn Interv Imaging. 2012 Nov;93(11):828-39. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Oct 18. Review.

2.

Three-phase dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging with two-way subtraction.

Choi N, Han BK, Choe YH, Kim HS.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005 Nov-Dec;29(6):834-41.

PMID:
16272861
3.
4.

Emerging techniques and molecular imaging in breast cancer.

Yang WT.

Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2011 Aug;32(4):288-99. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2011.03.003. Review.

PMID:
21782119
5.

Clinical and technical considerations for high quality breast MRI at 3 Tesla.

Rahbar H, Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Thursten B, Lehman CD.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Apr;37(4):778-90. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23834. Review.

PMID:
23526757
6.

A new contrast in MR mammography by means of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 3 Tesla: preliminary results.

Schmitt B, Zamecnik P, Zaiss M, Rerich E, Schuster L, Bachert P, Schlemmer HP.

Rofo. 2011 Nov;183(11):1030-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281764. Epub 2011 Oct 27.

PMID:
22034086
7.

Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.

Welsch GH, Zak L, Mamisch TC, Resinger C, Marlovits S, Trattnig S.

Invest Radiol. 2009 Sep;44(9):603-12. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b5333c.

PMID:
19692843
8.

Comparative utility of MRI perfusion with MSIDR and DWIBS for the characterization of breast tumors.

Zhang B, Zhu B, Li M, Yuan L, Yuan L, Zhang X, Yu H, Li C, Lu F, Zhou Z, Zhuang X.

Acta Radiol. 2012 Jul;53(6):607-14. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.120064. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

PMID:
22761342
9.

1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy?

Tozaki M, Fukuma E.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Sep;193(3):840-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2128.

PMID:
19696300
10.

The role of STIR MRI sequence in the evaluation of the breast following conservative surgery and radiotherapy.

Forrai G, Polgar C, Zana K, Riedl E, Fodor J, Nemeth G, Fornet B.

Neoplasma. 2001;48(1):7-11.

PMID:
11327541
11.

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine with high-resolution 3-dimensional T2-imaging.

Gerigk L, Bostel T, Hegewald A, Thomé C, Scharf J, Groden C, Neumaier-Probst E.

Clin Neuroradiol. 2012 Mar;22(1):93-9. doi: 10.1007/s00062-011-0121-2. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

PMID:
22193978
12.

Locally advanced breast cancer: comparison of mammography, sonography and MR imaging in evaluation of residual disease in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Londero V, Bazzocchi M, Del Frate C, Puglisi F, Di Loreto C, Francescutti G, Zuiani C.

Eur Radiol. 2004 Aug;14(8):1371-9. Epub 2004 Feb 18.

PMID:
14986052
13.

Critical role of spatial resolution in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI.

Furman-Haran E, Grobgeld D, Kelcz F, Degani H.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Jun;13(6):862-7.

PMID:
11382945
14.

Dynamic gradient-echo and fat-suppressed spin-echo contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast.

Kerslake RW, Carleton PJ, Fox JN, Imrie MJ, Cook AM, Read JR, Bowsley SJ, Buckley DL, Horsman A.

Clin Radiol. 1995 Jul;50(7):440-54.

PMID:
7614789
15.

MRI to X-ray mammography registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation.

Mertzanidou T, Hipwell J, Cardoso MJ, Zhang X, Tanner C, Ourselin S, Bick U, Huisman H, Karssemeijer N, Hawkes D.

Med Image Anal. 2012 Jul;16(5):966-75. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

PMID:
22513136
16.

Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.

Duarte GM, Cabello C, Torresan RZ, Alvarenga M, Telles GH, Bianchessi ST, Caserta N, Segala SR, de Lima Mda C, Etchebehere EC, Camargo EE, Tinois E.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Oct;14(10):2903-10. Epub 2007 Jul 15.

PMID:
17632758
17.

Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.

van Engeland S, Snoeren PR, Huisman H, Boetes C, Karssemeijer N.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006 Mar;25(3):273-82.

PMID:
16524084
18.

[MR imaging of the breast before and after neoadjuvant treatment - enhancement characteristics and T 2 signal intensity of breast cancers and breast parenchyma].

Siegmann KC, Müller KT, Vogel U, Krauss K, Claussen CD.

Rofo. 2010 Jun;182(6):493-500. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109883. Epub 2009 Dec 1. German.

PMID:
19953430
19.

MR imaging and proton spectroscopy of the breast: how to select the images useful to convey the diagnostic message.

Fausto A, Magaldi A, Babaei Paskeh B, Menicagli L, Lupo EN, Sardanelli F.

Radiol Med. 2007 Oct;112(7):1060-8. Epub 2007 Oct 21. English, Italian.

PMID:
17952685
20.

Nonmass lesions in magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: additional T2-weighted images improve diagnostic accuracy.

Baltzer PA, Dietzel M, Kaiser WA.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011 May-Jun;35(3):361-6. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31821065c3.

PMID:
21586932
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk