Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 189

1.

Contingent capture can occur at specific feature values: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Jiao J, Zhao G, Wang Q, Zhang K, Li H, Sun HJ, Liu Q.

Biol Psychol. 2013 Feb;92(2):125-34. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Oct 13.

PMID:
23069637
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.

Lien MC, Ruthruff E, Goodin Z, Remington RW.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Jun;34(3):509-30. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.509.

PMID:
18505320
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

The roles of feature-specific task set and bottom-up salience in attentional capture: an ERP study.

Eimer M, Kiss M, Press C, Sauter D.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1316-28. doi: 10.1037/a0015872.

PMID:
19803639
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
4.

The absence of a visual stimulus can trigger task-set-independent attentional capture.

Kiss M, Eimer M.

Psychophysiology. 2011 Oct;48(10):1426-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01207.x. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

PMID:
21504432
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Attentional set modulates visual areas: an event-related potential study of attentional capture.

Arnott SR, Pratt J, Shore DI, Alain C.

Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Dec;12(3):383-95.

PMID:
11689298
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.

Kiss M, Grubert A, Petersen A, Eimer M.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Mar;24(3):749-59. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00127. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

PMID:
21861683
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Eimer M, Kiss M.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):951-62. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.951.

PMID:
20436192
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Aging and involuntary attention capture: electrophysiological evidence for preserved attentional control with advanced age.

Lien MC, Gemperle A, Ruthruff E.

Psychol Aging. 2011 Mar;26(1):188-202. doi: 10.1037/a0021073.

PMID:
20973601
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.

Wykowska A, Schubö A.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Mar;23(3):645-60. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21390. Epub 2009 Nov 23.

PMID:
19929330
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Top-down task sets for combined features: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for two stages in attentional object selection.

Kiss M, Grubert A, Eimer M.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Feb;75(2):216-28. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0391-z.

PMID:
23143916
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

A unitary focus of spatial attention during attentional capture: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Grubert A, Righi LL, Eimer M.

J Vis. 2013 Jan 1;13(3):9. doi: 10.1167/13.3.9.

PMID:
23641076
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
12.

Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.

Hickey C, McDonald JJ, Theeuwes J.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Apr;18(4):604-13.

PMID:
16768363
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.

Becker SI, Folk CL, Remington RW.

Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):634-47. doi: 10.1177/0956797612458528. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

PMID:
23558547
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Eimer M, Kiss M.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Aug;20(8):1423-33. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20099.

PMID:
18303979
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
15.

Attentional capture by size singletons is determined by top-down search goals.

Kiss M, Eimer M.

Psychophysiology. 2011 Jun;48(6):784-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01145.x. Epub 2010 Oct 13.

PMID:
21539576
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.

Leblanc E, Prime DJ, Jolicoeur P.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Apr;20(4):657-71.

PMID:
18052780
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Goal-driven attentional capture by invisible colors: evidence from event-related potentials.

Ansorge U, Kiss M, Eimer M.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):648-53. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.648.

PMID:
19648447
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
18.

What top-down task sets do for us: an ERP study on the benefits of advance preparation in visual search.

Eimer M, Kiss M, Nicholas S.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Dec;37(6):1758-66. doi: 10.1037/a0024326. Epub 2011 Jun 20.

PMID:
21688941
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Brain structures involved in visual search in the presence and absence of color singletons.

Talsma D, Coe B, Munoz DP, Theeuwes J.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Apr;22(4):761-74. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21223.

PMID:
19309291
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture.

Liao HI, Yeh SL.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

PMID:
21645875
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk