Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

A Comparison of Vaginal vs. Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor-Double Blind Randomized Trial.

Jindal P, Avasthi K, Kaur M.

J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2011 Oct;61(5):538-42. Epub 2011 Oct 26.

PMID:
23024525
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
2.

A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.

How HY, Leaseburge L, Khoury JC, Siddiqi TA, Spinnato JA, Sibai BM.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;185(4):911-5.

PMID:
11641677
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.

Danielian P, Porter B, Ferri N, Summers J, Templeton A.

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Aug;106(8):793-7.

PMID:
10453828
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.

Paungmora N, Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P, Punyavachira P.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004 Oct;30(5):358-62.

PMID:
15327448
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Wing DA, Ham D, Paul RH.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 May;180(5):1155-60.

PMID:
10329871
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol tablets in induction of labour at term.

Shetty A, Danielian P, Templeton A.

BJOG. 2001 Mar;108(3):238-43.

PMID:
11281461
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.

Paisarntantiwong R, Getgan M.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Oct;88 Suppl 2:S56-62.

PMID:
17722318
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.

Ozkan S, Calişkan E, Doğer E, Yücesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jul;280(1):19-24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0843-9. Epub 2008 Nov 26.

PMID:
19034471
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.

Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Alfirevic Z.

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Aug;106(8):798-803. Review.

PMID:
10453829
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Oral misoprostol (100 microg) versus vaginal misoprostol (25 microg) in term labor induction: a randomized comparison.

Shetty A, Livingstone I, Acharya S, Rice P, Danielian P, Templeton A.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Dec;82(12):1103-6.

PMID:
14616254
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.

Chang CH, Chang FM.

J Formos Med Assoc. 1997 May;96(5):366-9.

PMID:
9170825
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Vaginal Misoprostol vs Vaginal Misoprostol With Estradiol for Labor Induction: A Prospective Double Blind Study.

Dasgupta E, Singh G.

J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012 Feb;62(1):47-51. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0156-6. Epub 2012 Apr 20.

PMID:
23372290
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
13.

A randomized comparison of oral and intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction.

Wing DA, Park MR, Paul RH.

Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jun;95(6 Pt 1):905-8.

PMID:
10831989
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation.

Wing DA, Paul RH.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jul;179(1):94-9.

PMID:
9704771
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

A comparison between intravaginal and oral misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Nopdonrattakoon L.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2003 Apr;29(2):87-91.

PMID:
12755528
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Intravaginal misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent.

Fletcher HM, Mitchell S, Simeon D, Frederick J, Brown D.

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Jul;100(7):641-4.

PMID:
8369246
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.

Farah LA, Sanchez-Ramos L, Rosa C, Del Valle GO, Gaudier FL, Delke I, Kaunitz AM.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Aug;177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71.

PMID:
9290452
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Cheng SY, Ming H, Lee JC.

Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;111(1):119-25. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000297313.68644.71.

PMID:
18165400
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Fisher SA, Mackenzie VP, Davies GA.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;185(4):906-10.

PMID:
11641676
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol.

Crane JM, Delaney T, Butt KD, Bennett KA, Hutchens D, Young DC.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004 May;15(5):319-23.

PMID:
15280123
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk