Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 110

1.

Effect of calibration and environmental condition on the performance of direct-reading organic vapor monitors.

Coffey C, LeBouf R, Lee L, Slaven J, Martin S.

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(11):670-80.

PMID:
23016630
2.

Effect of calibration environment on the performance of direct-reading organic vapor monitors.

LeBouf RF, Slaven JE, Coffey CC.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2013 May;63(5):528-33.

PMID:
23786144
3.

Effect of interferents on the performance of direct-reading organic vapor monitors.

LeBouf RF, Coffey CC.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2015 Mar;65(3):261-9. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2014.986308.

4.

Measurement capability of field portable organic vapor monitoring instruments under different experimental conditions.

Coffey CC, Pearce TA, Lawrence RB, Hudnall JB, Slaven JE, Martin SB Jr.

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009 Jan;6(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/15459620802514728.

PMID:
18949604
5.

Performance testing of three portable, direct-reading dust monitors.

Thorpe A, Walsh PT.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2002 Mar;46(2):197-207.

6.

Field investigation comparing diffusion badge and charcoal tube monitoring for styrene.

Dobos RT.

Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2000 Sep;15(9):673-6.

PMID:
10983400
8.

[Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].

Biggeri A, Bellini P, Terracini B; Italian MISA Group.

Epidemiol Prev. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2 Suppl):1-71. Italian.

PMID:
11515188
9.

Benzene in air--organic vapor monitors versus charcoal tubes.

Pristas R.

Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1991 Jul;52(7):297-304.

PMID:
1951067
11.

Short duration needle trap sampling with gas chromatography analysis to determine nearly instantaneous concentrations of selected organic vapor contaminants.

Strating SJ, Juarez TJ, Stevens ME Jr, White DW, Smith PA.

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(12):674-84. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.831982.

PMID:
24195534
12.
13.

Direct field observation of the relative humidity effect on the beta-gauge readings.

Tsai CJ, Chang CT, Huang CH.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2006 Jun;56(6):834-40.

PMID:
16805408
14.
15.

Field evaluation of a portable photoionization detector for assessing exposure to solvent mixtures.

Coy JD, Bigelow PL, Buchan RM, Tessari JD, Parnell JO.

AIHAJ. 2000 Mar-Apr;61(2):268-74.

PMID:
10782199
16.

Side-by-side comparison of field monitoring methods for hot bitumen emission exposures: the German IFA Method 6305, U.S. NIOSH Method 5042, and the Total Organic Matter Method.

Kriech AJ, Emmel C, Osborn LV, Breuer D, Redman AP, Hoeber D, Bochmann F, Ruehl R.

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010 Dec;7(12):712-25. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2010.529792. Erratum in: J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011 Sep;8(9):D92-6.

PMID:
21058156
17.

Development of a sampling and analytical method for 2,2-dichloro-1,1,1-trifluoroethane in workplace air.

Shin YC, Yi GY, Kim Y, Paik NW.

AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2002 Nov-Dec;63(6):715-20.

PMID:
12570079
18.
19.

[Evaluation of individual exposure to organic solvents using a portable VOC monitor].

Enomoto M.

Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2006 Nov;48(6):214-20. Japanese.

20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk