Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 119

1.

The removal of acetabular bone in hip resurfacing and cementless total hip replacement: a comparison using the ratio of the size of the acetabular component to the diameter of the native femoral head.

Cross MB, Dolan MM, Sidhu GS, Nguyen J, Mayman DJ, Su EP.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Oct;94(10):1339-43.

PMID:
23015557
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a comparison with hybrid total hip arthroplasty.

Loughead JM, Starks I, Chesney D, Matthews JN, McCaskie AW, Holland JP.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jan;88(1):31-4.

PMID:
16365116
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
3.

A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement.

Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Girard J, Roy AG.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Aug;88(8):997-1002.

PMID:
16877595
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
4.

Comparison of bone removed during total hip arthroplasty with a resurfacing or conventional femoral component: a cadaveric study.

Su EP, Sheehan M, Su SL.

J Arthroplasty. 2010 Feb;25(2):325-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Dec 3.

PMID:
19056234
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry.

Jameson SS, Baker PN, Mason J, Gregg PJ, Brewster N, Deehan DJ, Reed MR.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Dec;94(12):1611-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B12.30040.

PMID:
23188900
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.

Merle C, Grammatopoulos G, Waldstein W, Pegg E, Pandit H, Aldinger PR, Gill HS, Murray DW.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Nov 20;95(22):e172. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01014.

PMID:
24257672
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Cemented polyethylene and cementless porous-coated acetabular components have similar outcomes at a mean of seven years after total hip replacement: a prospective randomised study.

Angadi DS, Brown S, Crawfurd EJ.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Dec;94(12):1604-10. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B12.28060.

PMID:
23188899
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Comparison of acetabular reamings during hip resurfacing versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Brennan SA, Harty JA, Gormley C, O'Rourke SK.

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009 Apr;17(1):42-6.

PMID:
19398792
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
9.

Surface replacement of the hip can result in decreased acetabular bone stock.

Tanzer M, Tanzer D, Smith K.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):541-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2020-x.

PMID:
21858642
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
10.

Total hip replacement with a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component in patients younger than fifty years of age.

Kim YH, Kook HK, Kim JS.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 May;84-A(5):770-4.

PMID:
12004019
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Dislocation rate after conversion from hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty.

Sah AP, Estok DM 2nd.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Mar;90(3):506-16. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00479.

PMID:
18310700
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Changes in bone mineral density of the acetabulum, femoral neck and femoral shaft, after hip resurfacing and total hip replacement: two-year results from a randomised study.

Penny JO, Brixen K, Varmarken JE, Ovesen O, Overgaard S.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Aug;94(8):1036-44. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B8.28222.

PMID:
22844043
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.
14.

Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Health Quality Ontario.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(4):1-57. Epub 2006 Feb 1.

PMID:
23074495
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
15.

Second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty. Eight to eleven-year results.

Archibeck MJ, Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Quigley LR, Gitelis S, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Nov;83-A(11):1666-73.

PMID:
11701789
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.
17.

Hip resurfacing requires larger acetabular cups than conventional hip replacement: a comparative analysis of 100 hips, based on radiographic templating.

Schmidutz F, Fottner A, Wanke-Jellinek L, Steinbrück A, Jansson V, Mazzochian F.

Acta Orthop Belg. 2012 Aug;78(4):484-91.

PMID:
23019781
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Total hip arthroplasty with cementless cups and femoral head autografts for patients with hip dysplasia and osteoarthritis.

Wu LD, Jin LB, Yan SG, Yang QS, Dai XS, Wang XH.

Chin J Traumatol. 2004 Oct;7(5):280-5.

PMID:
15363221
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

[Total hip replacement in osteoarthritis with acetabular protrusion].

Rozkydal Z, Kunovský R.

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2003;70(5):296-302. Czech.

PMID:
14669592
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Total hip arthroplasty with a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component in the treatment of Chinese patients with femoral head necrosis.

Hui Z, Pei FX, Shen B, Yang J, Chen ZY, Huang Q.

J Arthroplasty. 2008 Oct;23(7):1022-30. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.09.012. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

PMID:
18534498
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk