Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 106

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23009662)

1.

Methods of improving speech intelligibility for listeners with hearing resolution deficit.

Kupryjanow A, Czyzewski A.

Diagn Pathol. 2012 Sep 25;7:129. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-7-129.

2.

Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.

Fink N, Furst M, Muchnik C.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Sep;132(3):1718-31. doi: 10.1121/1.4739441.

PMID:
22978899
3.

The impact of reverberant self-masking and overlap-masking effects on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners (L).

Kokkinakis K, Loizou PC.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Sep;130(3):1099-102. doi: 10.1121/1.3614539.

4.

The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.

Koning R, Wouters J.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Oct;132(4):2569-81. doi: 10.1121/1.4748965.

PMID:
23039450
5.

The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.

Chen F, Wong LL, Tahmina Q, Azimi B, Hu Y.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):EL142-8. doi: 10.1121/1.4737595.

PMID:
22894313
6.

Speech perception in simulated electric hearing exploits information-bearing acoustic change.

Stilp CE, Goupell MJ, Kluender KR.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Feb;133(2):EL136-41. doi: 10.1121/1.4776773.

7.

The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.

Saripella R, Loizou PC, Thibodeau L, Alford JA.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):3028-37. doi: 10.1121/1.3641407.

8.

Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.

Qazi OU, van Dijk B, Moonen M, Wouters J.

Hear Res. 2013 May;299:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

PMID:
23396271
9.
10.

Acoustic cue integration in speech intonation recognition with cochlear implants.

Peng SC, Chatterjee M, Lu N.

Trends Amplif. 2012 Jun;16(2):67-82. doi: 10.1177/1084713812451159. Epub 2012 Jul 11.

11.

A beamformer post-filter for cochlear implant noise reduction.

Hersbach AA, Grayden DB, Fallon JB, McDermott HJ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Apr;133(4):2412-20. doi: 10.1121/1.4794391.

PMID:
23556606
12.

Single and multiple microphone noise reduction strategies in cochlear implants.

Kokkinakis K, Azimi B, Hu Y, Friedland DR.

Trends Amplif. 2012 Jun;16(2):102-16. doi: 10.1177/1084713812456906. Epub 2012 Aug 23. Review.

13.

Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.

Guerrero Lopez HA, Mondain M, Amy de la Bretèque B, Serrafero P, Trottier C, Barkat-Defradas M.

J Voice. 2013 Jul;27(4):523.e1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.03.005.

PMID:
23809572
14.

Predicting the speech reception threshold of cochlear implant listeners using an envelope-correlation based measure.

Yousefian N, Loizou PC.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):3399-405. doi: 10.1121/1.4754539.

15.

Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Carroll J, Tiaden S, Zeng FG.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):2054-62. doi: 10.1121/1.3631563.

16.

The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners.

Hazrati O, Loizou PC.

Int J Audiol. 2012 Jun;51(6):437-43. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.658972. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

17.

Effects of speaking style on speech intelligibility for Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Li Y, Zhang G, Kang HY, Liu S, Han D, Fu QJ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jun;129(6):EL242-7. doi: 10.1121/1.3582148.

18.

Weighting of cues for fricative place of articulation perception by children wearing cochlear implants.

Hedrick M, Bahng J, von Hapsburg D, Younger MS.

Int J Audiol. 2011 Aug;50(8):540-7. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.549515. Epub 2011 May 23.

PMID:
21604957
19.

Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of channel bandwidth on consonant and vowel identification by hearing-impaired listeners.

Strelcyk O, Li N, Rodriguez J, Kalluri S, Edwards B.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Mar;133(3):1598-606. doi: 10.1121/1.4789894.

PMID:
23464029
20.

The effect of cochlear implantation on nasalance of speech in postlingually hearing-impaired adults.

Hassan SM, Malki KH, Mesallam TA, Farahat M, Bukhari M, Murry T.

J Voice. 2012 Sep;26(5):669.e17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Nov 13.

PMID:
22082866
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk