Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 200

1.

Overcoming challenges to achieving meaningful use: insights from hospitals that successfully received Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services payments in 2011.

Harle CA, Huerta TR, Ford EW, Diana ML, Menachemi N.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):233-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001142. Epub 2012 Sep 22.

2.

Hospital characteristics associated with achievement of meaningful use.

Diana ML, Harle CA, Huerta TR, Ford EW, Menachemi N.

J Healthc Manag. 2014 Jul-Aug;59(4):272-84; discussion 285-6.

PMID:
25154125
3.

Early results from the hospital Electronic Health Record Incentive Programs.

Adler-Milstein J, Furukawa MF, King J, Jha AK.

Am J Manag Care. 2013 Jul 1;19(7):e273-84.

4.

Factors associated with meaningful use incentives in children's hospitals.

Teufel RJ 2nd, Yu FB Jr, Nakamura MM, Harper MB, Menachemi N.

Pediatrics. 2015 Jun;135(6):e1409-16. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2720. Epub 2015 May 11.

PMID:
25963005
5.

The current state of electronic health record (EHR) use in Oklahoma.

Khaliq AA, Mwachofi AK, Hughes DR, Broyles RW, Wheeler D, Roswell RH.

J Okla State Med Assoc. 2013 Feb;106(2):53-6.

PMID:
23620983
6.

Analyzing stage 1 and stage 2 meaningful use differences.

Viola A.

J AHIMA. 2012 Nov-Dec;83(11):52-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
23210298
8.

Stage 1 of the meaningful use incentive program for electronic health records: a study of readiness for change in ambulatory practice settings in one integrated delivery system.

Shea CM, Reiter KL, Weaver MA, McIntyre M, Mose J, Thornhill J, Malone R, Weiner BJ.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Dec 14;14:119. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0119-1.

9.
11.

Hospital characteristics related to the intention to apply for meaningful use incentive payments.

Diana ML, Kazley AS, Ford EW, Menachemi N.

Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012;9:1h. Epub 2012 Apr 1.

12.

Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program. Final rule.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

Fed Regist. 2010 Jul 28;75(144):44313-588.

13.

Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program--stage 2. Final rule.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

Fed Regist. 2012 Sep 4;77(171):53967-4162.

14.

Payer mix and EHR adoption in hospitals.

Shin DY, Menachemi N, Diana M, Kazley AS, Ford EW.

J Healthc Manag. 2012 Nov-Dec;57(6):435-48; discussion 449-50.

PMID:
23297609
15.

Area-level factors associated with electronic health record adoption and meaningful use in the Regional Extension Center Program.

Samuel CA.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):976-83. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002347. Epub 2014 May 5.

16.

Unraveling the mystery of MU audits. 7 strategies to protect your practice.

Dolan PL.

Med Econ. 2014 Mar 10;91(5):14-6, 18-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
25137904
17.

Stage 2 EHR final rule is released.

[No authors listed]

Health Devices. 2012 Oct;41(10):331-2. No abstract available.

PMID:
23444674
18.

Variation in electronic health record adoption and readiness for meaningful use: 2008-2011.

Patel V, Jamoom E, Hsiao CJ, Furukawa MF, Buntin M.

J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28(7):957-64. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2324-x. Epub 2013 Feb 1.

20.

Achieving meaningful use of health information technology: a guide for physicians to the EHR incentive programs.

Marcotte L, Seidman J, Trudel K, Berwick DM, Blumenthal D, Mostashari F, Jain SH.

Arch Intern Med. 2012 May 14;172(9):731-6. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.872.

PMID:
22782203
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk