Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 190

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 22984499)

1.

Maize benefits the predatory beetle, Propylea japonica (Thunberg), to provide potential to enhance biological control for aphids in cotton.

Ouyang F, Men X, Yang B, Su J, Zhang Y, Zhao Z, Ge F.

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044379. Epub 2012 Sep 12.

3.

Landscape diversity enhances biological control of an introduced crop pest in the north-central USA.

Gardiner MM, Landis DA, Gratton C, DiFonzo CD, O'Neal M, Chacon JM, Wayo MT, Schmidt NP, Mueller EE, Heimpel GE.

Ecol Appl. 2009 Jan;19(1):143-54.

PMID:
19323179
4.

Identification of top-down forces regulating cotton aphid population growth in transgenic Bt cotton in central China.

Han P, Niu CY, Desneux N.

PLoS One. 2014 Aug 29;9(8):e102980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102980. eCollection 2014.

5.
6.

Potential cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii, population suppression by arthropod predators in upland cotton.

Shrestha RB, Parajulee MN.

Insect Sci. 2013 Dec;20(6):778-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01583.x. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

PMID:
23956125
7.
8.

Influence of cover crops on insect pests and predators in conservation tillage cotton.

Tillman G, Schomberg H, Phatak S, Mullinix B, Lachnicht S, Timper P, Olson D.

J Econ Entomol. 2004 Aug;97(4):1217-32.

PMID:
15384330
9.

Survival and behavioural responses of the predatory ladybird beetle, Eriopis connexa populations susceptible and resistant to a pyrethroid insecticide.

Spíndola AF, Silva-Torres CS, Rodrigues AR, Torres JB.

Bull Entomol Res. 2013 Aug;103(4):485-94. doi: 10.1017/S0007485313000072. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

PMID:
23522490
10.

Prey-mediated effects of transgenic canola on a beneficial, non-target, carabid beetle.

Ferry N, Mulligan EA, Stewart CN, Tabashnik BE, Port GR, Gatehouse AM.

Transgenic Res. 2006 Aug;15(4):501-14.

PMID:
16906450
11.

Using field-evolved resistance to Cry1F maize in a lepidopteran pest to demonstrate no adverse effects of Cry1F on one of its major predators.

Tian JC, Collins HL, Romeis J, Naranjo SE, Hellmich RL, Shelton AM.

Transgenic Res. 2012 Dec;21(6):1303-10. doi: 10.1007/s11248-012-9604-4. Epub 2012 Feb 29.

12.

[Biological control efficiency of ladybirds on arthropod pests in cotton agroecosystems].

Ge F, Liu X, Pang W, Dang Y.

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2002 Jul;13(7):841-4. Chinese.

PMID:
12385215
13.
14.

Indian Bt cotton varieties do not affect the performance of cotton aphids.

Lawo NC, Wäckers FL, Romeis J.

PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004804. Epub 2009 Mar 12.

15.

Changes in delta 13C stable isotopes in multiple tissues of insect predators fed isotopically distinct prey.

Gratton C, Forbes AE.

Oecologia. 2006 Apr;147(4):615-24. Epub 2005 Dec 10.

PMID:
16341886
16.

Evolution of aphidophagous ladybird populations in a vegetable crop and implications as biological agents.

Francis F, Colignon P, Hastir P, Haubruge E, Gaspar C.

Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet. 2001;66(2a):333-40.

PMID:
12425054
17.
19.

A comprehensive assessment of the effects of Bt cotton on Coleomegilla maculata demonstrates no detrimental effects by Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab.

Li Y, Romeis J, Wang P, Peng Y, Shelton AM.

PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022185. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

20.

Changes in herbivore control in arable fields by detrital subsidies depend on predator species and vary in space.

von Berg K, Thies C, Tscharntke T, Scheu S.

Oecologia. 2010 Aug;163(4):1033-42. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1604-6. Epub 2010 Mar 28.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk