Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 124

1.

Evaluation of early bone response to fluoride-modified and anodically oxidized titanium implants through continuous removal torque analysis.

Kwon TK, Lee HJ, Min SK, Yeo IS.

Implant Dent. 2012 Oct;21(5):427-32.

PMID:
22971981
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Comparison between bioactive fluoride modified and bioinert anodically oxidized implant surfaces in early bone response using rabbit tibia model.

Choi JY, Lee HJ, Jang JU, Yeo IS.

Implant Dent. 2012 Apr;21(2):124-8. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318249f283.

PMID:
22382750
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Effects of a calcium phosphate coating on the osseointegration of endosseous implants in a rabbit model.

Fontana F, Rocchietta I, Addis A, Schupbach P, Zanotti G, Simion M.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jul;22(7):760-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02056.x. Epub 2010 Dec 29.

PMID:
21198895
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: A histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit.

Sennerby L, Dasmah A, Larsson B, Iverhed M.

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S13-20.

PMID:
16137083
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces.

Sul YT, Johansson C, Albrektsson T.

Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Jul-Aug;19(4):319-28.

PMID:
16900812
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration.

Meirelles L, Currie F, Jacobsson M, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):641-7.

PMID:
18807559
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit.

Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, Caputo A, Davies JE, Nishimura RD.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Aug;12(4):350-7. English, French, German.

PMID:
11488864
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants.

Sul YT, Jeong Y, Johansson C, Albrektsson T.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17(5):521-6.

PMID:
16958691
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.

Hoffmann O, Angelov N, Zafiropoulos GG, Andreana S.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):352-8.

PMID:
22442775
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Stimulation of directed bone growth at oxidized titanium implants by macroscopic grooves: an in vivo study.

Hall J, Miranda-Burgos P, Sennerby L.

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S76-82.

PMID:
16137091
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in rabbits.

Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J.

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2(3):120-8.

PMID:
11359256
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.

Fernandes Ede L, Unikowski IL, Teixeira ER, da Costa NP, Shinkai RS.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):886-92.

PMID:
18271369
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure.

Sul YT, Johansson C, Wennerberg A, Cho LR, Chang BS, Albrektsson T.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):349-59.

PMID:
15973946
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants.

Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmén A.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Sep-Oct;19(5):659-66.

PMID:
15508981
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Removal torque values of titanium implants inserted into bone defects filled with hydroxyapatite: a histologic and histomorphometric analysis in rabbit.

Scarano A, Carinci F, Mangano C, Quaranta A, Piattelli A.

Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2007 Jan-Mar;20(1 Suppl 1):49-53.

PMID:
17897502
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.

Faeda RS, Tavares HS, Sartori R, Guastaldi AC, Marcantonio E Jr.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Aug;67(8):1706-15. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.046.

PMID:
19615586
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Comparison of osseointegration on various implant surfaces after bacterial contamination and cleaning: a rabbit study.

Yuan K, Chan YJ, Kung KC, Lee TM.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jan-Feb;29(1):32-40. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2436.

PMID:
24451851
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Evaluation of a novel calcium phosphate-coated titanium porous oxide implant surface: a study in rabbits.

Poulos NM, Rodriguez NA, Lee J, Rueggeberg FA, Schüpbach P, Hall J, Susin C, Wikesjö UM.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):731-8.

PMID:
21841981
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

The removal torque of titanium screw inserted in rabbit tibia treated by dual acid etching.

Cho SA, Park KT.

Biomaterials. 2003 Sep;24(20):3611-7.

PMID:
12809791
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Effect of alendronate on endosseous implant integration: an in vivo study in rabbits.

Chacon GE, Stine EA, Larsen PE, Beck FM, McGlumphy EA.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Jul;64(7):1005-9.

PMID:
16781331
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk