Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 219

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 22964835)

1.

Weak selection and protein evolution.

Akashi H, Osada N, Ohta T.

Genetics. 2012 Sep;192(1):15-31. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.140178. Review.

2.

A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation.

Connallon T, Clark AG.

Genetics. 2012 Apr;190(4):1477-89. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.137117. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

3.

Fluctuations in fitness distributions and the effects of weak linked selection on sequence evolution.

Good BH, Desai MM.

Theor Popul Biol. 2013 May;85:86-102. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

PMID:
23337315
4.

Natural selection affects multiple aspects of genetic variation at putatively neutral sites across the human genome.

Lohmueller KE, Albrechtsen A, Li Y, Kim SY, Korneliussen T, Vinckenbosch N, Tian G, Huerta-Sanchez E, Feder AF, Grarup N, Jørgensen T, Jiang T, Witte DR, Sandbæk A, Hellmann I, Lauritzen T, Hansen T, Pedersen O, Wang J, Nielsen R.

PLoS Genet. 2011 Oct;7(10):e1002326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002326. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

5.
6.
7.

The nearly neutral and selection theories of molecular evolution under the fisher geometrical framework: substitution rate, population size, and complexity.

Razeto-Barry P, Díaz J, Vásquez RA.

Genetics. 2012 Jun;191(2):523-34. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.138628. Epub 2012 Mar 16.

8.

The dynamics of adaptation on correlated fitness landscapes.

Kryazhimskiy S, Tkacik G, Plotkin JB.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 3;106(44):18638-43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905497106. Epub 2009 Oct 26.

9.

Weak selection and recent mutational changes influence polymorphic synonymous mutations in humans.

Comeron JM.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 2;103(18):6940-5. Epub 2006 Apr 21.

10.

Rational evolutionary design: the theory of in vitro protein evolution.

Voigt CA, Kauffman S, Wang ZG.

Adv Protein Chem. 2000;55:79-160. Review.

PMID:
11050933
11.

Population, evolutionary and genomic consequences of interference selection.

Comeron JM, Kreitman M.

Genetics. 2002 May;161(1):389-410.

12.

The neutral theory is dead. Long live the neutral theory.

Kreitman M.

Bioessays. 1996 Aug;18(8):678-83; discussion 683.

PMID:
8760341
13.

The structure of genealogies in the presence of purifying selection: a fitness-class coalescent.

Walczak AM, Nicolaisen LE, Plotkin JB, Desai MM.

Genetics. 2012 Feb;190(2):753-79. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.134544. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

14.
15.

DNA evolution under weak selection.

Tachida H.

Gene. 2000 Dec 30;261(1):3-9.

PMID:
11164031
16.

Near-neutrality, robustness, and epigenetics.

Ohta T.

Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:1034-8. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr012.

18.

Distributions of beneficial fitness effects in RNA.

Cowperthwaite MC, Bull JJ, Meyers LA.

Genetics. 2005 Aug;170(4):1449-57. Epub 2005 Jun 8.

19.

Coalescent under the evolution of coadaptation.

Ryo Takahasi K.

Mol Ecol. 2009 Dec;18(24):5018-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04424.x. Epub 2009 Nov 11.

PMID:
19912539
20.

Molecular evolution, mutation size and gene pleiotropy: a geometric reexamination.

Razeto-Barry P, Díaz J, Cotoras D, Vásquez RA.

Genetics. 2011 Mar;187(3):877-85. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.125195. Epub 2010 Dec 31.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk