Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 116

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 22959281)

1.

Hip fracture discrimination from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry by statistical model registration.

Whitmarsh T, Fritscher KD, Humbert L, del Río Barquero LM, Roth T, Kammerlander C, Blauth M, Schubert R, Frangi AF.

Bone. 2012 Nov;51(5):896-901. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.08.114. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

PMID:
22959281
2.

A preliminary dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based finite element model for assessing osteoporotic hip fracture risk.

Luo Y, Ferdous Z, Leslie WD.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2011 Dec;225(12):1188-95.

PMID:
22320058
3.

In vivo discrimination of hip fracture with quantitative computed tomography: results from the prospective European Femur Fracture Study (EFFECT).

Bousson VD, Adams J, Engelke K, Aout M, Cohen-Solal M, Bergot C, Haguenauer D, Goldberg D, Champion K, Aksouh R, Vicaut E, Laredo JD.

J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Apr;26(4):881-93. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.270.

PMID:
20939025
4.

Assessment of femoral neck strength by 3-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry.

Le Bras A, Kolta S, Soubrane P, Skalli W, Roux C, Mitton D.

J Clin Densitom. 2006 Oct-Dec;9(4):425-30. Epub 2006 Sep 28.

PMID:
17097528
5.

Reconstructing the 3D shape and bone mineral density distribution of the proximal femur from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Whitmarsh T, Humbert L, De Craene M, Del Rio Barquero LM, Frangi AF.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011 Dec;30(12):2101-14. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2163074. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

PMID:
21803681
6.

Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men.

Gonnelli S, Cepollaro C, Gennari L, Montagnani A, Caffarelli C, Merlotti D, Rossi S, Cadirni A, Nuti R.

Osteoporos Int. 2005 Aug;16(8):963-8. Epub 2004 Dec 14.

PMID:
15599495
7.

Multi-site bone ultrasound measurements in elderly women with and without previous hip fractures.

Karjalainen JP, Riekkinen O, Töyräs J, Hakulinen M, Kröger H, Rikkonen T, Salovaara K, Jurvelin JS.

Osteoporos Int. 2012 Apr;23(4):1287-95. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1682-2. Epub 2011 Jun 9.

PMID:
21656263
8.

3D reconstruction of the lumbar vertebrae from anteroposterior and lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Whitmarsh T, Humbert L, Del Río Barquero LM, Di Gregorio S, Frangi AF.

Med Image Anal. 2013 May;17(4):475-87. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

PMID:
23466075
9.

Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture.

Pulkkinen P, Partanen J, Jalovaara P, Jämsä T.

Osteoporos Int. 2004 Apr;15(4):274-80. Epub 2004 Feb 3.

PMID:
14760516
10.

Local topological analysis of densitometer-generated scan images of the proximal femur for differentiation between patients with hip fracture and age-matched controls.

Boehm HF, Lutz J, Horng A, Notohamiprodjo M, Panteleon A, Pfeifer KJ, Reiser M.

Osteoporos Int. 2009 Apr;20(4):617-24. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0706-z. Epub 2008 Aug 7.

PMID:
18685880
11.

Improving risk assessment: hip geometry, bone mineral distribution and bone strength in hip fracture cases and controls. The EPOS study. European Prospective Osteoporosis Study.

Crabtree NJ, Kroger H, Martin A, Pols HA, Lorenc R, Nijs J, Stepan JJ, Falch JA, Miazgowski T, Grazio S, Raptou P, Adams J, Collings A, Khaw KT, Rushton N, Lunt M, Dixon AK, Reeve J.

Osteoporos Int. 2002 Jan;13(1):48-54.

PMID:
11883408
12.

Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Jergas M, Breitenseher M, Glüer CC, Yu W, Genant HK.

J Bone Miner Res. 1995 Jul;10(7):1101-10.

PMID:
7484286
13.

Bone density reduction in various measurement sites in men and women with osteoporotic fractures of spine and hip: the European quantitation of osteoporosis study.

Kröger H, Lunt M, Reeve J, Dequeker J, Adams JE, Birkenhager JC, Diaz Curiel M, Felsenberg D, Hyldstrup L, Kotzki P, Laval-Jeantet A, Lips P, Louis O, Perez Cano R, Reiners C, Ribot C, Ruegsegger P, Schneider P, Braillon P, Pearson J.

Calcif Tissue Int. 1999 Mar;64(3):191-9.

PMID:
10024374
14.

Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.

Grampp S, Genant HK, Mathur A, Lang P, Jergas M, Takada M, Glüer CC, Lu Y, Chavez M.

J Bone Miner Res. 1997 May;12(5):697-711.

PMID:
9144335
15.

Use of DXA-based finite element analysis of the proximal femur in a longitudinal study of hip fracture.

Naylor KE, McCloskey EV, Eastell R, Yang L.

J Bone Miner Res. 2013 May;28(5):1014-21. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1856.

PMID:
23281096
16.

Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry.

Cheng XG, Lowet G, Boonen S, Nicholson PH, Brys P, Nijs J, Dequeker J.

Bone. 1997 Mar;20(3):213-8.

PMID:
9071471
17.

Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk.

Frediani B, Acciai C, Falsetti P, Baldi F, Filippou G, Siagkri C, Spreafico A, Galeazzi M, Marcolongo R.

Calcif Tissue Int. 2006 Oct;79(4):223-9. Epub 2006 Sep 14.

PMID:
16969597
19.

Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores.

Khoo BC, Brown K, Cann C, Zhu K, Henzell S, Low V, Gustafsson S, Price RI, Prince RL.

Osteoporos Int. 2009 Sep;20(9):1539-45. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0820-y. Epub 2008 Dec 24.

PMID:
19107384
20.

Technical note: comparison between single and multiview simulated DXA configurations for reconstructing the 3D shape and bone mineral density distribution of the proximal femur.

Humbert L, Whitmarsh T, Craene MD, Del Río Barquero LM, Frangi AF.

Med Phys. 2012 Aug;39(8):5272-6. doi: 10.1118/1.4736540.

PMID:
22894452
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk