Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 87

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 22920580)

1.

High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of prostatectomy specimens: a promising tool for virtual histology.

Durand M, Robinson BD, Aronowitz E, Tewari AK, Ballon DJ.

Eur Urol. 2012 Nov;62(5):938-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.023. Epub 2012 Aug 19. No abstract available.

PMID:
22920580
2.

Magnetic resonance histology.

Johnson GA.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jul;42(1):1-2. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24774. Epub 2014 Oct 9. No abstract available.

PMID:
25297922
3.

Editorial comment.

Ghavamian R.

Urology. 2014 Feb;83(2):375. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.09.046. No abstract available.

PMID:
24468512
4.

Overuse of magnetic resonance imaging.

Emery DJ, Shojania KG, Forster AJ, Mojaverian N, Feasby TE.

JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 13;173(9):823-5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3804. No abstract available. Erratum in: JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Aug 12;173(15):1477.

PMID:
23529302
5.

[Accuracy of endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative local staging of prostate cancer].

Baccos A, Schiavina R, Zukerman Z, Busato F, Gaudiano C, Salizzoni E, Fiorentino M, Golfieri R, Martorana G.

Urologia. 2012 Apr-Jun;79(2):116-22. doi: 10.5301/RU.2012.9207. Italian.

6.

Recovery of urinary function after radical prostatectomy: predictors of urinary function on preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging.

von Bodman C, Matsushita K, Savage C, Matikainen MP, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Rabbani F, Akin O, Sandhu JS.

J Urol. 2012 Mar;187(3):945-50. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.143. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

PMID:
22264458
7.

Pathologic validation of a model based on diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for tumor delineation in the prostate peripheral zone.

Groenendaal G, Borren A, Moman MR, Monninkhof E, van Diest PJ, Philippens ME, van Vulpen M, van der Heide UA.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 1;82(3):e537-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.07.021. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

PMID:
22197085
8.

[Real time elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of preoperative imaging and histology after radical prostatectomy].

Walz J, Marcy M, Maubon T, Brunelle S, Laroche J, Gravis G, Salem N, Bladou F.

Prog Urol. 2011 Dec;21(13):925-31. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 Jun 2. French.

PMID:
22118357
9.

Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.

Goris Gbenou MC, Peltier A, Addla SK, Lemort M, Bollens R, Larsimont D, Roumeguère T, Schulman CC, van Velthoven R.

Urol Int. 2012;88(1):12-7. doi: 10.1159/000331909. Epub 2011 Oct 15.

PMID:
22004874
10.

[Neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy - indications and protocols].

Lamche M, Schramek P.

Wien Med Wochenschr. 2011 Aug;161(15-16):374-6. doi: 10.1007/s10354-011-0013-8. Review. German.

PMID:
21953427
11.

High-resolution MRI of excised human prostate specimens acquired with 9.4T in detection and identification of cancers: validation of a technique.

Fan X, Haney CR, Agrawal G, Pelizzari CA, Antic T, Eggener SE, Sethi I, River JN, Zamora M, Karczmar GS, Oto A.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct;34(4):956-61. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22745.

PMID:
21928309
12.

Prostate cancer detection by prebiopsy 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Nishida S, Kinoshita H, Mishima T, Kurokawa H, Sakaida N, Matsuda T.

Int J Urol. 2011 Sep;18(9):653-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02814.x. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

PMID:
21790792
13.
14.

Incremental value of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer.

Nishida K, Yuen S, Kamoi K, Yamada K, Akazawa K, Ito H, Okihara K, Kawauchi A, Miki T, Nishimura T.

Acta Radiol. 2011 Feb 1;52(1):120-6. doi: 10.1258/ar.2010.100293.

PMID:
21498337
15.

[Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate: comparison of two different post-processing algorithms].

Beyersdorff D, Lüdemann L, Dietz E, Galler D, Marchot P, Franiel T.

Rofo. 2011 May;183(5):456-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1246051. Epub 2011 Mar 25. German.

PMID:
21442558
16.

Advances in magnetic resonance imaging: how they are changing the management of prostate cancer.

Sciarra A, Barentsz J, Bjartell A, Eastham J, Hricak H, Panebianco V, Witjes JA.

Eur Urol. 2011 Jun;59(6):962-77. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.034. Epub 2011 Feb 23. Review.

PMID:
21367519
17.

MRI of the prostate: interobserver agreement compared with histopathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy.

Ruprecht O, Weisser P, Bodelle B, Ackermann H, Vogl TJ.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Mar;81(3):456-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.076. Epub 2011 Feb 26.

PMID:
21354732
18.

Magnetic resonance imaging in staging of locoregional prostate cancer: comparison of results with analysis post-surgical histopathology.

Caldas ME, Miranda LC, Bittencourt LK.

Rev Col Bras Cir. 2010 Dec;37(6):447-9. English, Portuguese.

19.

Primary prostatic Wilms' tumor: a case report.

Chen M, Chang HK, Chang KM, Yang S.

Acta Cytol. 2010 Sep-Oct;54(5 Suppl):943-5.

PMID:
21053574
20.

Prediction of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: initial results.

Park SY, Kim CK, Park BK, Lee HM, Lee KS.

Eur Radiol. 2011 May;21(5):1111-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1999-9. Epub 2010 Nov 3.

PMID:
21046403
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk