Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 108

Related Citations for PubMed (Select 22783178)

1.

Specifying social cognitive processes with a social dual-task paradigm.

Liepelt R, Stenzel A, Lappe M.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Apr 18;6:86. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00086. eCollection 2012.

2.

[Aging and cognitive slowing: example of attentional processes--evaluation procedures and related questions].

Eusop E, Sebban C, Piette F.

Encephale. 2001 Jan-Feb;27(1):39-44. Review. French.

PMID:
11294037
3.

How two share two tasks: evidence of a social psychological refractory period effect.

Liepelt R, Prinz W.

Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):387-96. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2703-2. Epub 2011 May 5.

PMID:
21544510
4.

Understanding action beyond imitation: reversed compatibility effects of action observation in imitation and joint action.

van Schie HT, van Waterschoot BM, Bekkering H.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Dec;34(6):1493-500. doi: 10.1037/a0011750.

PMID:
19045988
5.

Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.

Boyer TW, Longo MR, Bertenthal BI.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Mar;139(3):440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Feb 9.

PMID:
22326448
6.

The influence of Oxytocin on automatic motor simulation.

De Coster L, Mueller SC, T'Sjoen G, De Saedeleer L, Brass M.

Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014 Dec;50:220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.08.021. Epub 2014 Sep 6.

PMID:
25240207
7.

How a co-actor's task affects monitoring of own errors: evidence from a social event-related potential study.

de Bruijn ER, Miedl SF, Bekkering H.

Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):397-404. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2615-1. Epub 2011 Mar 22.

8.

Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness.

Stelzel C, Schubert T.

Psychol Res. 2011 Nov;75(6):476-90. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0368-x. Epub 2011 Aug 3.

PMID:
21811837
9.

Trial-to-trial sequential dependencies in a social and non-social Simon task.

Liepelt R, Wenke D, Fischer R, Prinz W.

Psychol Res. 2011 Sep;75(5):366-75. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0314-3. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

PMID:
21085984
10.

The controlled imitation task: a new paradigm for studying self-other control.

Obhi SS, Hogeveen J.

PeerJ. 2013 Sep 19;1:e161. doi: 10.7717/peerj.161. eCollection 2013.

11.
12.

Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task.

Guagnano D, Rusconi E, Umiltà CA.

Cognition. 2010 Mar;114(3):348-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.008. Epub 2009 Nov 14.

PMID:
19914615
13.

Negative priming in a joint selection task.

Welsh TN, McDougall LM.

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042963. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

14.

Balance performance with a cognitive task: a continuation of the dual-task testing paradigm.

Resch JE, May B, Tomporowski PD, Ferrara MS.

J Athl Train. 2011 Mar-Apr;46(2):170-5. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.2.170.

15.

[Schizophrenia and semantic priming effects].

Lecardeur L, Giffard B, Eustache F, Dollfus S.

Encephale. 2006 Jan-Feb;32(1 Pt 1):75-82. Review. French.

PMID:
16633293
16.

Involuntary strategy-dependent dual task performance.

Israel M, Cohen A.

Psychol Res. 2011 Nov;75(6):513-24. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0359-y. Epub 2011 Jul 7.

PMID:
21735041
17.

A neuropsychological assessment of dual-task costs in closed-head injury patients using Cohen's effect size estimation method.

Dell'Acqua R, Sessa P, Pashler H.

Psychol Res. 2006 Nov;70(6):553-61. Epub 2005 Sep 2.

PMID:
16142490
18.

The Virtual Co-Actor: The Social Simon Effect does not Rely on Online Feedback from the Other.

Vlainic E, Liepelt R, Colzato LS, Prinz W, Hommel B.

Front Psychol. 2010 Dec 3;1:208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00208. eCollection 2010.

19.

The effect of task order predictability in audio-visual dual task performance: Just a central capacity limitation?

Töllner T, Strobach T, Schubert T, Müller HJ.

Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 Sep 11;6:75. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00075. eCollection 2012.

20.

Group membership affects spontaneous mental representation: failure to represent the out-group in a joint action task.

McClung JS, Jentzsch I, Reicher SD.

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 20;8(11):e79178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079178. eCollection 2013.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk