Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 87

1.

California defeats tax increase on cigarettes to fund research.

Roehr B.

BMJ. 2012 Jun 13;344:e4112. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4112. No abstract available.

PMID:
22695912
2.

Cancer. California weighs tobacco tax hike to fund research.

Miller G.

Science. 2012 Apr 27;336(6080):399-400. doi: 10.1126/science.336.6080.399. No abstract available.

PMID:
22539688
3.

Model state uses cigarette tax to fund cancer research.

Baute L.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989 Dec 6;81(23):1772-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
2585527
4.

California stem-cell institute fights legal challenges.

Dalton R.

Nature. 2005 Jun 2;435(7042):544. No abstract available.

PMID:
15957195
5.
6.

Taxation, regulation, and addiction: a demand function for cigarettes based on time-series evidence.

Keeler TE, Hu TW, Barnett PG, Manning WG.

J Health Econ. 1993 Apr;12(1):1-18.

PMID:
10126486
7.

Getting key players to work together and defending against diversion--California.

Martin CB, Beerline D, Breslow L.

Cancer. 1998 Dec 15;83(12 Suppl Robert):2697-701.

PMID:
9874380
8.

Cigarette taxes. The straw to break the camel's back.

Grossman M, Chaloupka FJ.

Public Health Rep. 1997 Jul-Aug;112(4):290-7.

9.

[Effects of tobacco tax increase on cigarette consumption and the impact on health policy].

Plamper E, Klever Deichert G, Lauterbach KW.

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2006 Jul;49(7):660-4. German.

PMID:
16741704
10.

[Evaluation of the 2003 tobacco tax increase in Germany].

Isensee B, Hanewinkel R.

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2004 Aug;47(8):771-9. German.

PMID:
15340721
11.

First-year impact of the 1989 California cigarette tax increase on cigarette consumption.

Flewelling RL, Kenney E, Elder JP, Pierce J, Johnson M, Bal DG.

Am J Public Health. 1992 Jun;82(6):867-9.

12.

Public health: tobacco taxes and Internet sales--2005. End of Year Issue Brief.

McKinley A.

Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2005 Dec 31:1-7.

PMID:
16715554
13.

Was there significant tax evasion after the 1999 50 cent per pack cigarette tax increase in California?

Emery S, White MM, Gilpin EA, Pierce JP.

Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11(2):130-4.

14.

History of successful ballot initiatives--California.

Najera AP.

Cancer. 1998 Dec 15;83(12 Suppl Robert):2680-4.

PMID:
9874376
15.

The impact of California Proposition 99, a major anti-smoking law, on cigarette consumption.

Hu TW, Bai J, Keeler TE, Barnett PG, Sung HY.

J Public Health Policy. 1994 Spring;15(1):26-36.

PMID:
8027359
16.

[A scholar, fund holder, insurance and tax authority].

Elovainio L.

Duodecim. 1995;111(19):1897-901. Finnish. No abstract available.

PMID:
9340294
17.

The effect of Taiwan's tax-induced increases in cigarette prices on brand-switching and the consumption of cigarettes.

Tsai YW, Yang CL, Chen CS, Liu TC, Chen PF.

Health Econ. 2005 Jun;14(6):627-41.

PMID:
15791675
18.

KMA flexes defensive muscle in '09 session: achieves priority of an increased cigarette tax.

Nunnelley PP.

J Ky Med Assoc. 2009 Jun;107(6):207-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
19585940
19.

Why we need a tax on sleeping pills.

Kripke DF.

South Med J. 1983 May;76(5):632-6.

PMID:
6405485
20.

Effect of a large increase in cigarette tax on cigarette consumption: an empirical analysis of cross-sectional survey data.

Lee JM.

Public Health. 2008 Oct;122(10):1061-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.12.013. Epub 2008 Jul 7.

PMID:
18602655
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk