Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 125

1.

Can we reliably benchmark health technology assessment organizations?

Drummond M, Neumann P, Jönsson B, Luce B, Schwartz JS, Siebert U, Sullivan SD.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Apr;28(2):159-65. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000098.

PMID:
22559758
2.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

3.

Strengthening cost-effectiveness analysis in Thailand through the establishment of the health intervention and technology assessment program.

Tantivess S, Teerawattananon Y, Mills A.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(11):931-45. doi: 10.2165/11314710-000000000-00000. Review.

PMID:
19888793
4.

Are Key Principles for improved health technology assessment supported and used by health technology assessment organizations?

International Working Group for HTA Advancement, Neumann PJ, Drummond MF, Jönsson B, Luce BR, Schwartz JS, Siebert U, Sullivan SD.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010 Jan;26(1):71-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990833.

PMID:
20059783
5.

Technology assessment and the sociopolitics of health technologies.

Lehoux P, Blume S.

J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000 Dec;25(6):1083-120.

PMID:
11142053
6.

Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions.

Drummond MF, Schwartz JS, Jönsson B, Luce BR, Neumann PJ, Siebert U, Sullivan SD.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Summer;24(3):244-58; discussion 362-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080343.

PMID:
18601792
7.

Health technology assessment.

Hailey D.

Singapore Med J. 2006 Mar;47(3):187-92; quiz 193.

8.

International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.

Levy AR, Mitton C, Johnston KM, Harrigan B, Briggs AH.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):813-30. doi: 10.2165/11536150-000000000-00000. Review.

PMID:
20831289
9.

Practical tools and methods for health technology assessment in Europe: structures, methodologies, and tools developed by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA.

Kristensen FB, Lampe K, Chase DL, Lee-Robin SH, Wild C, Moharra M, Garrido MV, Nielsen CP, Røttingen JA, Neikter SA, Bistrup ML; European network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA).

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Dec;25 Suppl 2:1-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990626.

PMID:
20030885
10.

Prioritizing investments in health technology assessment. Can we assess potential value for money?

Davies L, Drummond M, Papanikolaou P.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Winter;16(1):73-91.

PMID:
10815355
11.

Thai health technology assessment guideline development.

Teerawattananon Y, Chaikledkaew U.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jun;91 Suppl 2:S11-5.

PMID:
19253483
12.

Historical development of health technology assessment in Thailand.

Teerawattananon Y, Tantivess S, Yothasamut J, Kingkaew P, Chaisiri K.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:241-52. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090709. Epub 2009 Jun 16.

PMID:
19527543
13.

Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe.

Nielsen CP, Funch TM, Kristensen FB.

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Jul;16 Suppl 2:6-15. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011050.

PMID:
21737525
14.

Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.

Dundar Y, Dodd S, Dickson R, Walley T, Haycox A, Williamson PR.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. Review.

15.

Do the findings of case series studies vary significantly according to methodological characteristics?

Dalziel K, Round A, Stein K, Garside R, Castelnuovo E, Payne L.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jan;9(2):iii-iv, 1-146. Review.

16.

The impact of health technology assessment reports on decision making in Austria.

Zechmeister I, Schumacher I.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jan;28(1):77-84. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000729. Epub 2012 Jan 11.

PMID:
22233544
17.

Health technology assessment and priority setting for health policy in Sweden.

Carlsson P.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Winter;20(1):44-54.

PMID:
15176176
18.

An assessment of the impact of the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme.

Hanney S, Buxton M, Green C, Coulson D, Raftery J.

Health Technol Assess. 2007 Dec;11(53):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-180. Review.

19.

An international survey of the public engagement practices of health technology assessment organizations.

Whitty JA.

Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.09.011.

20.

Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.

Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Roberts H, Tomsick T, Connors B, Barr J, Dillon W, Warach S, Broderick J, Tilley B, Sacks D; Technology Assessment Committee of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology; Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology.

Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. Epub 2003 Jul 17. Erratum in: Stroke. 2003 Nov;34(11):2774.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk