Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Efficacy of a remote based computerised visual acuity measurement.

Srinivasan K, Ramesh SV, Babu N, Sanker N, Ray A, Karuna SM.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul;96(7):987-90. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301751. Epub 2012 Apr 26.

PMID:
22539747
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.

Laidlaw DA, Tailor V, Shah N, Atamian S, Harcourt C.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;92(2):241-4. Epub 2007 Nov 9.

PMID:
17993577
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Automated determination of distance visual acuity: towards teleophthalmology services.

Kumar S, Bulsara M, Yogesan K.

Clin Exp Optom. 2008 Nov;91(6):545-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00267.x. Epub 2008 Apr 21.

PMID:
18430039
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Effect of letter separation on computerised visual acuity measurements: comparison with the gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.

Shah N, Laidlaw DA, Brown G, Robson C.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Mar;30(2):200-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00700.x.

PMID:
20444125
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Validation of printed and computerised crowded Kay picture logMAR tests against gold standard ETDRS acuity test chart measurements in adult and amblyopic paediatric subjects.

Shah N, Laidlaw DA, Rashid S, Hysi P.

Eye (Lond). 2012 Apr;26(4):593-600. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.333. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

PMID:
22193878
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
6.

Evaluating a new logMAR chart designed to improve visual acuity assessment in population-based surveys.

Bourne RR, Rosser DA, Sukudom P, Dineen B, Laidlaw DA, Johnson GJ, Murdoch IE.

Eye (Lond). 2003 Aug;17(6):754-8.

PMID:
12928690
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device.

Rosser DA, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DA.

Eye (Lond). 2003 Aug;17(6):701-6.

PMID:
12928680
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol.

Beck RW, Moke PS, Turpin AH, Ferris FL 3rd, SanGiovanni JP, Johnson CA, Birch EE, Chandler DL, Cox TA, Blair RC, Kraker RT.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Feb;135(2):194-205.

PMID:
12566024
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

[A computerized method for visual acuity assessment].

Arippol PK, Salomão SR, Belfort R Jr.

Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2006 Nov-Dec;69(6):907-14. Portuguese.

PMID:
17273687
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
10.

A portable visual acuity device used in diabetic retinal screening.

Kehler LF, Kehler KB, Merin LM, Tsai JC.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;143(3):514-5. Epub 2006 Nov 13.

PMID:
17317400
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Screening for myopia and refractive errors using LogMAR visual acuity by optometrists and a simplified visual acuity chart by nurses.

Tong L, Saw SM, Chan ES, Yap M, Lee HY, Kwang YP, Tan D.

Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;81(9):684-91.

PMID:
15365388
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Sweep pattern visual evoked potential acuity in children during their periods of visual development.

Li L, Su Y, Chen CZ, Feng C, Zheng HM, Xing YQ.

Ophthalmologica. 2011;226(4):220-7. doi: 10.1159/000329866. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

PMID:
21811053
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Methods of visual acuity determination with the spatial frequency sweep visual evoked potential.

Ridder WH 3rd.

Doc Ophthalmol. 2004 Nov;109(3):239-47.

PMID:
15957609
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Comparison of visual acuity results in preschool children with lea symbols and Bailey-Lovie E chart.

Sanker N, Dhirani S, Bhakat P.

Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct-Dec;20(4):345-8. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.120020.

PMID:
24339687
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
15.

Construction and validation of a Tamil logMAR chart.

Varadharajan S, Srinivasan K, Kumaresan B.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009 Sep;29(5):526-534. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00657.x.

PMID:
19689549
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Variability of measurements of visual acuity in a large eye clinic.

Siderov J, Tiu AL.

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999 Dec;77(6):673-6.

PMID:
10634561
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Comparing a traditional single optotype visual acuity test with a computer-based visual acuity test for childhood amblyopia vision screening: a pilot study.

Schlenker MB, Christakis TJ, Braga-Mele RM.

Can J Ophthalmol. 2010 Aug;45(4):368-74. doi: 10.3129/i10-034.

PMID:
20648081
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

[Visual acuity measured via the Freiburg visual acuity test (FVT), Bailey Lovie chart and Landolt Ring chart].

Wesemann W.

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2002 Sep;219(9):660-7. German.

PMID:
12410466
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

[The characteristic of vernier acuity on retrobulbar neuritis patients].

Liu Q, Li S, Woo G, Tang S.

Yan Ke Xue Bao. 2003 Jun;19(2):104-6. Chinese.

PMID:
12870346
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Relationship between vision impairment and eye disease to vision-specific quality of life and function in rural India: the Aravind Comprehensive Eye Survey.

Nirmalan PK, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Thulasiraj RD, Krishnadas R, Ramakrishnan R, Robin AL.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;46(7):2308-12.

PMID:
15980215
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk