Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 134

1.

Do adenocarcinomas of the prostate with Gleason score (GS) ≤6 have the potential to metastasize to lymph nodes?

Ross HM, Kryvenko ON, Cowan JE, Simko JP, Wheeler TM, Epstein JI.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Sep;36(9):1346-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182556dcd.

2.

Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate with lymph node metastases: analysis of 184 radical prostatectomy specimens.

Kryvenko ON, Gupta NS, Virani N, Schultz D, Gomez J, Amin A, Lane Z, Epstein JI.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 May;137(5):610-7. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0128-OA.

PMID:
23627451
3.

Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.

Gottipati S, Warncke J, Vollmer R, Humphrey PA.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Jun;36(6):900-7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182495dee.

PMID:
22367295
4.

Impact on the clinical outcome of prostate cancer by the 2005 international society of urological pathology modified Gleason grading system.

Dong F, Wang C, Farris AB, Wu S, Lee H, Olumi AF, McDougal WS, Young RH, Wu CL.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Jun;36(6):838-43. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182486faf.

PMID:
22592143
5.

Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.

Choy B, Pearce SM, Anderson BB, Shalhav AL, Zagaja G, Eggener SE, Paner GP.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Jul 1. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
27379821
6.

The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA; Grading Committee.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530. Review.

PMID:
26492179
7.

Clinical Validation of the 2005 ISUP Gleason Grading System in a Cohort of Intermediate and High Risk Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.

Faraj SF, Bezerra SM, Yousefi K, Fedor H, Glavaris S, Han M, Partin AW, Humphreys E, Tosoian J, Johnson MH, Davicioni E, Trock BJ, Schaeffer EM, Ross AE, Netto GJ.

PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0146189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146189. eCollection 2016.

8.

Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival.

Turker P, Bas E, Bozkurt S, Günlüsoy B, Sezgin A, Postacı H, Turkeri L.

Urol Oncol. 2013 Jan;31(1):93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.10.009. Epub 2011 Feb 12.

PMID:
21316989
9.

A pathological reassessment of organ-confined, Gleason score 6 prostatic adenocarcinomas that progress after radical prostatectomy.

Miyamoto H, Hernandez DJ, Epstein JI.

Hum Pathol. 2009 Dec;40(12):1693-8. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 Aug 14.

PMID:
19683331
10.

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasialike ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a clinicopathologic study of 28 cases.

Tavora F, Epstein JI.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 Jul;32(7):1060-7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318160edaf.

PMID:
18496142
11.

Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.

Egevad L, Ahmad AS, Algaba F, Berney DM, Boccon-Gibod L, Compérat E, Evans AJ, Griffiths D, Grobholz R, Kristiansen G, Langner C, Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R, Moss S, Oliveira P, Vainer B, Varma M, Camparo P.

Histopathology. 2013 Jan;62(2):247-56. doi: 10.1111/his.12008.

PMID:
23240715
12.

Differing risk of cancer death among patients with lymph node metastasis after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: identification of risk categories according to number of positive nodes and Gleason score.

Schiavina R, Borghesi M, Brunocilla E, Manferrari F, Fiorentino M, Vagnoni V, Baccos A, Pultrone CV, Rocca GC, Rizzi S, Martorana G.

BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(8):1237-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11602.x. Epub 2013 Jan 17.

13.
14.

An update of the Gleason grading system.

Epstein JI.

J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.046. Epub 2009 Dec 14. Review.

PMID:
20006878
15.

Prostate cancer topography and patterns of lymph node metastasis.

Tokuda Y, Carlino LJ, Gopalan A, Tickoo SK, Kaag MG, Guillonneau B, Eastham JA, Scher HI, Scardino PT, Reuter VE, Fine SW.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Dec;34(12):1862-7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181fc679e.

16.
17.

The heterogeneous Gleason 7 carcinoma of the prostate: analyses of low and high grade (risk) carcinomas with criteria of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP).

Helpap B, Ringli D, Shaikhibrahim Z, Wernert N, Kristiansen G.

Pathol Res Pract. 2013 Mar;209(3):190-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2012.10.016. Epub 2013 Feb 15.

PMID:
23419692
18.

From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.

Samaratunga H, Delahunt B, Yaxley J, Srigley JR, Egevad L.

Scand J Urol. 2016 Jul 14:1-5. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
27415753
19.

The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.

Helpap B, Egevad L.

Virchows Arch. 2006 Dec;449(6):622-7. Epub 2006 Nov 8.

PMID:
17091254
20.

The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Mosse CA, Magi-Galluzzi C, Tsuzuki T, Epstein JI.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2004 Mar;28(3):394-8.

PMID:
15104304
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk