Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 90

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 22515987)

1.

Publication bias: what are the challenges and can they be overcome?

Joober R, Schmitz N, Annable L, Boksa P.

J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2012 May;37(3):149-52. doi: 10.1503/jpn.120065. No abstract available.

2.

Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences.

Thornton A, Lee P.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;53(2):207-16. Review.

PMID:
10729693
3.

The iceberg phenomenon and publication bias: the editors' fault?

Boissel JP, Haugh MC.

Clin Trials Metaanal. 1993 Nov;28(6):309-15. No abstract available.

PMID:
10150179
4.

Assessing publication bias in meta-analysis.

Soeken KL, Sripusanapan A.

Nurs Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;52(1):57-60.

PMID:
12552177
5.

Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases.

Palma S, Delgado-Rodriguez M.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Oct;59(10):864-9. Review.

6.

Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.

Ioannidis JP.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):951-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00986.x. Review.

PMID:
19018930
7.

Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review.

Sutton AJ, Song F, Gilbody SM, Abrams KR.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2000 Oct;9(5):421-45. Review.

PMID:
11191259
8.

Is there bias in the publication of individual patient data meta-analyses?

Tierney JF, Clarke M, Stewart LA.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Spring;16(2):657-67.

PMID:
10932430
9.

Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.

Formann AK.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Sep;29(5):732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 May 19.

PMID:
18586577
10.

Sir: is that bias?

Reilly D.

J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Oct;11(5):785. No abstract available.

PMID:
16296907
11.

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias.

Knobloch K, Yoon U, Vogt PM.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011 Mar;39(2):91-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.11.001. Epub 2010 Dec 9.

PMID:
21145753
12.

The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.

Vavken P, Dorotka R.

J Orthop Sci. 2011 Mar;16(2):238-44. doi: 10.1007/s00776-011-0040-8. Epub 2011 Mar 2.

PMID:
21360256
14.

Avoiding biased publishing.

Ho KM.

Crit Care Med. 2003 May;31(5):1598; author reply 1598-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
12771651
15.

Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis. It may be crucially important for patients.

Gotzsche PC.

BMJ. 2000 Sep 9;321(7261):585-6. No abstract available.

16.

Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.

Mahid SS, Qadan M, Hornung CA, Galandiuk S.

Br J Surg. 2008 Aug;95(8):943-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6302. Review.

PMID:
18618864
17.

Asymmetry in The Lancet meta-analysis.

Frass M, Schuster E, Muchitsch I, Duncan J, Geir W, Kozel G, Kastinger-Mayr C, Felleitner AE, Reiter C, Endler C, Oberbaum M.

Homeopathy. 2006 Jan;95(1):52-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
16399256
18.

Bias in the trial and reporting of trials of homeopathy: a fundamental breakdown in peer review and standards?

Frass M, Schuster E, Muchitsch I, Duncan J, Gei W, Kozel G, Kastinger-Mayr C, Felleitner AE, Reiter C, Endler C, Oberbaum M.

J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Oct;11(5):780-2. No abstract available.

PMID:
16296904
20.

A survey of publication bias within evolutionary ecology.

Cassey P, Ewen JG, Blackburn TM, Møller AP.

Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Dec 7;271 Suppl 6:S451-4.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk