Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 117

1.
2.

MRI versus ultrasonography and mammography for preoperative assessment of breast cancer.

Wasif N, Garreau J, Terando A, Kirsch D, Mund DF, Giuliano AE.

Am Surg. 2009 Oct;75(10):970-5.

PMID:
19886147
3.

Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in predicting infiltrating residual disease after preoperative chemotherapy in stage II-III breast cancer.

Guarneri V, Pecchi A, Piacentini F, Barbieri E, Dieci MV, Ficarra G, Tazzioli G, Frassoldati A, Battista R, Canossi B, Mauri C, D'Amico R, Conte P, Torricelli P.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Aug;18(8):2150-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1590-x. Epub 2011 Feb 8.

PMID:
21301969
4.

Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers.

Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM, Bethke KP.

Arch Surg. 2007 May;142(5):441-5; discussion 445-7.

PMID:
17515485
5.

Role of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of tumor response to preoperative concurrent radiochemotherapy for large breast cancers: a prospective phase II study.

Bollet MA, Thibault F, Bouillon K, Meunier M, Sigal-Zafrani B, Savignoni A, Diéras V, Nos C, Salmon R, Fourquet A; Institut Curie Breast Cancer Study Group.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Sep 1;69(1):13-8. Epub 2007 Apr 20.

PMID:
17449193
6.

Correlating sonography, mammography, and pathology in the assessment of breast cancer size.

Hieken TJ, Harrison J, Herreros J, Velasco JM.

Am J Surg. 2001 Oct;182(4):351-4.

PMID:
11720669
7.

Accuracy of tumour size assessment in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison of digital mammography, tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MRI.

Luparia A, Mariscotti G, Durando M, Ciatto S, Bosco D, Campanino PP, Castellano I, Sapino A, Gandini G.

Radiol Med. 2013 Oct;118(7):1119-36. doi: 10.1007/s11547-013-0941-z. Epub 2013 Jun 25.

PMID:
23801389
8.

Sonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and mammographic assessments of preoperative size of breast cancer.

Yang WT, Lam WW, Cheung H, Suen M, King WW, Metreweli C.

J Ultrasound Med. 1997 Dec;16(12):791-7.

9.

[The "EVA" Trial: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Diagnostic Methods (Mammography, Ultrasound, MRI) in the secondary and tertiary prevention of familial breast cancer. Preliminary results after the first half of the study period].

Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Weigel S, Nüssle-Kügele K, Sittek H, Arand B, Morakkabati N, Leutner C, Tombach B, Nordhoff D, Perlet C, Rieber A, Heindel W, Brambs HJ, Schild H.

Rofo. 2005 Jun;177(6):818-27. German.

PMID:
15902631
10.

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, multidetector row computed tomography, ultrasonography, and mammography for tumor extension of breast cancer.

Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, Uchida Y.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Dec;112(3):461-74. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9890-y. Epub 2008 Jan 12.

PMID:
18193352
11.

Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment.

Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, Colpaert C, Schelfhout AM, Leyman P, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, Van Den Haute J, Gillardin JP, Tjalma W, Van Der Auwera JC, Buytaert P, De Schepper A.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004 Jun;30(5):501-7.

PMID:
15135477
12.

Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography.

Hata T, Takahashi H, Watanabe K, Takahashi M, Taguchi K, Itoh T, Todo S.

J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Feb;198(2):190-7.

PMID:
14759774
13.

Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer.

Kneeshaw PJ, Turnbull LW, Smith A, Drew PJ.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003 Feb;29(1):32-7.

PMID:
12559074
14.

[Preoperative MRT of the breast in invasive lobular carcinoma in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma].

Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Beljavskaja M, Bick U, Taupitz M, Blohmer JU, Winzer KJ, Hamm B.

Rofo. 2004 Apr;176(4):544-9. German.

PMID:
15088179
15.

Does MRI predict pathologic tumor response in women with breast cancer undergoing preoperative chemotherapy?

Segara D, Krop IE, Garber JE, Winer E, Harris L, Bellon JR, Birdwell R, Lester S, Lipsitz S, Iglehart JD, Golshan M.

J Surg Oncol. 2007 Nov 1;96(6):474-80.

PMID:
17640031
16.

Breast cancer tumor size: correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and pathology measurements.

Onesti JK, Mangus BE, Helmer SD, Osland JS.

Am J Surg. 2008 Dec;196(6):844-48; discussion 849-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.028.

PMID:
19095098
17.

Breast cancer measurements with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography.

Davis PL, Staiger MJ, Harris KB, Ganott MA, Klementaviciene J, McCarty KS Jr, Tobon H.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;37(1):1-9.

PMID:
8750522
18.

Potential impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the breast on patient selection for accelerated partial breast irradiation.

Kühr M, Wolfgarten M, Stölzle M, Leutner C, Höller T, Schrading S, Kuhl C, Schild H, Kuhn W, Braun M.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e541-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.04.035. Epub 2011 Jun 12.

PMID:
21664064
19.

Optimal assessment of residual disease after neo-adjuvant therapy for locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer--clinical examination, mammography, or magnetic resonance imaging?

Wright FC, Zubovits J, Gardner S, Fitzgerald B, Clemons M, Quan ML, Causer P.

J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun 1;101(7):604-10. doi: 10.1002/jso.21559.

PMID:
20461768
20.

Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Girardi V, Carbognin G, Camera L, Baglio I, Bucci A, Bonetti F, Mucelli RP.

Radiol Med. 2011 Dec;116(8):1226-38. doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0704-7. Epub 2011 Jul 9. English, Italian.

PMID:
21744256
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk