Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 118

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 22455399)

1.

Reciprocal cooperation between unrelated rats depends on cost to donor and benefit to recipient.

Schneeberger K, Dietz M, Taborsky M.

BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Mar 29;12:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-41.

2.

Evolutionary dynamics of the continuous iterated prisoner's dilemma.

Le S, Boyd R.

J Theor Biol. 2007 Mar 21;245(2):258-67. Epub 2006 Sep 20.

PMID:
17125798
3.

Long-term social bonds promote cooperation in the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.

St-Pierre A, Larose K, Dubois F.

Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Dec 7;276(1676):4223-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1156. Epub 2009 Sep 9.

4.

Green-beard effect predicts the evolution of traitorousness in the two-tag Prisoner's dilemma.

Laird RA.

J Theor Biol. 2011 Nov 7;288:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.07.023. Epub 2011 Aug 2.

PMID:
21821051
5.

Discounting and reciprocity in an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.

Stephens DW, McLinn CM, Stevens JR.

Science. 2002 Dec 13;298(5601):2216-8.

6.

Chaos, oscillation and the evolution of indirect reciprocity in n-person games.

Suzuki S, Akiyama E.

J Theor Biol. 2008 Jun 21;252(4):686-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Feb 16.

PMID:
18371983
7.

Human cooperation in social dilemmas: comparing the Snowdrift game with the Prisoner's Dilemma.

Kümmerli R, Colliard C, Fiechter N, Petitpierre B, Russier F, Keller L.

Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Dec 7;274(1628):2965-70.

8.

Cognitive and motivational requirements for the emergence of cooperation in a rat social game.

Viana DS, Gordo I, Sucena E, Moita MA.

PLoS One. 2010 Jan 13;5(1):e8483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008483.

9.

Resolving the iterated prisoner's dilemma: theory and reality.

Raihani NJ, Bshary R.

J Evol Biol. 2011 Aug;24(8):1628-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02307.x. Epub 2011 May 23. Review.

PMID:
21599777
10.

Norway rats reciprocate help according to the quality of help they received.

Dolivo V, Taborsky M.

Biol Lett. 2015 Feb;11(2):20140959. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0959.

PMID:
25716088
11.

Generous cooperators can outperform non-generous cooperators when replacing a population of defectors.

Kurokawa S, Wakano JY, Ihara Y.

Theor Popul Biol. 2010 Jun;77(4):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

PMID:
20226204
12.

A theoretical analysis of temporal difference learning in the iterated prisoner's dilemma game.

Masuda N, Ohtsuki H.

Bull Math Biol. 2009 Nov;71(8):1818-50. doi: 10.1007/s11538-009-9424-8. Epub 2009 May 29.

PMID:
19479310
13.

The continuous Prisoner's dilemma: II. Linear reactive strategies with noise.

Wahl LM, Nowak MA.

J Theor Biol. 1999 Oct 7;200(3):323-38.

PMID:
10527721
14.

Three is a crowd in iterated prisoner's dilemmas: experimental evidence on reciprocal behavior.

Grujić J, Eke B, Cabrales A, Cuesta JA, Sánchez A.

Sci Rep. 2012;2:638. doi: 10.1038/srep00638. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

15.

Cooperation and assortativity with dynamic partner updating.

Wang J, Suri S, Watts DJ.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 4;109(36):14363-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120867109. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

16.

Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations.

Nowak MA, Sasaki A, Taylor C, Fudenberg D.

Nature. 2004 Apr 8;428(6983):646-50.

PMID:
15071593
17.

Preferential partner selection in an evolutionary study of Prisoner's Dilemma.

Ashlock D, Smucker MD, Stanley EA, Tesfatsion L.

Biosystems. 1996;37(1-2):99-125.

PMID:
8924642
18.
19.

Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game.

Hauert C, Doebeli M.

Nature. 2004 Apr 8;428(6983):643-6.

PMID:
15074318
20.

Assortment and the evolution of generalized reciprocity.

Rankin DJ, Taborsky M.

Evolution. 2009 Jul;63(7):1913-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00656.x. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

PMID:
19222566
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk