Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 100

1.

Emerging trends in the volume and format of outside examinations submitted for secondary interpretation.

Hunt CH, Wood CP, Diehn FE, Eckel LJ, Schwartz KM, Erickson BJ.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Apr;198(4):764-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7512.

2.
3.

[CD-ROM burning of CT scan images: initial experience].

Schmitz E, Rolland Y, Marin F, Rambeau M, Duvauferrier R.

J Radiol. 2003 Dec;84(12 Pt 1):1953-9. French.

4.

DICOM router: an open source toolbox for communication and correction of DICOM objects.

Hackländer T, Kleber K, Martin J, Mertens H.

Acad Radiol. 2005 Mar;12(3):385-92.

PMID:
15766700
5.

Formal reporting of second-opinion CT interpretation: experience and reimbursement in the emergency department setting.

Jeffers AB, Saghir A, Camacho M.

Emerg Radiol. 2012 Jun;19(3):187-93. doi: 10.1007/s10140-011-1016-x. Epub 2012 Jan 13.

PMID:
22246582
6.

Integration of a multimedia teaching and reference database in a PACS environment.

Rosset A, Ratib O, Geissbuhler A, Vallée JP.

Radiographics. 2002 Nov-Dec;22(6):1567-77.

PMID:
12432130
7.

[Development of a low-cost DICOM-server for teaching and research purposes].

Sparacia G, Carollo V, La Tona G, Cardinale AE.

Radiol Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;107(1-2):98-101. English, Italian.

PMID:
15031701
8.

Evaluation of the use of CD-ROM upload into the PACS or institutional web server.

van Ooijen PM, Roosjen R, de Blecourt MJ, van Dam R, Broekema A, Oudkerk M.

J Digit Imaging. 2006;19 Suppl 1:72-7.

9.

Evaluation of self-contained PACS viewers on CD-ROM.

Hosch RE, Rivard AL.

J Digit Imaging. 2014 Aug;27(4):470-3. doi: 10.1007/s10278-014-9675-2.

10.

A digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) print service for chest imaging.

Tucker DM, Suitor CT, Shepard SJ, Schomer DF.

J Digit Imaging. 1997 Aug;10(3):120-5.

11.

Interpretation accuracy of a CCD film digitizer.

Gitlin JN, Scott WW, Bell K, Narayan A.

J Digit Imaging. 2002;15 Suppl 1:57-63. Epub 2002 Mar 21.

12.

3D ultrasound DICOM data of the thyroid gland. First experiences in exporting, archiving, second reading and 3D processing.

Freesmeyer M, Darr A, Schierz JH, Schleussner E, Wiegand S, Opfermann T.

Nuklearmedizin. 2012;51(3):73-8. doi: 10.3413/Nukmed-0471-12-01. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

PMID:
22526598
13.

Accuracy of interpretation of CT scans: comparing PACS monitor displays and hard-copy images.

Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Dec;179(6):1407-10.

PMID:
12438025
14.

Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film.

Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, Pomerantz S, Dahlke A, Rallis D.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Apr;176(4):861-4.

PMID:
11264065
15.

Managing DICOM images: Tips and tricks for the radiologist.

Varma DR.

Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2012 Jan;22(1):4-13. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.95396.

16.

Radiology report times: impact of picture archiving and communication systems.

Bryan S, Weatherburn G, Watkins J, Roddie M, Keen J, Muris N, Buxton MJ.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 May;170(5):1153-9.

PMID:
9574575
17.

Incorporating out-patient data from CD-R into the local PACS using DICOM worklist features.

van Ooijen PM, Guignot J, Mevel G, Oudkerk M.

J Digit Imaging. 2005 Sep;18(3):196-202.

18.

Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display.

Pisano ED, Cole EB, Kistner EO, Muller KE, Hemminger BM, Brown ML, Johnston RE, Kuzmiak CM, Braeuning MP, Freimanis RI, Soo MS, Baker JA, Walsh R.

Radiology. 2002 May;223(2):483-8.

PMID:
11997557
19.

Preliminary time-flow study: comparison of interpretation times between PACS workstations and films.

Kato H, Kubota G, Kojima K, Hayashi N, Nishihara E, Kura H, Aizawa M.

Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1995 May-Jun;19(3):261-5.

PMID:
7641170
20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk