Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 349

1.

The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening.

Checka CM, Chun JE, Schnabel FR, Lee J, Toth H.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar;198(3):W292-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6049.

PMID:
22358028
2.

Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.

Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, White E.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jul 5;92(13):1081-7.

3.

Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status.

Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, Parekh N, Salane M, Brinton LA, Hoover R, Haile R.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Nov 1;87(21):1622-9.

PMID:
7563205
4.

A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements.

Vacek PM, Geller BM.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 May;13(5):715-22.

5.
6.

Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old.

Stomper PC, D'Souza DJ, DiNitto PA, Arredondo MA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Nov;167(5):1261-5.

PMID:
8911192
7.

Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.

White E, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Geller BM, Rosenberg RD, Kerlikowske K, Saba L, Vacek PM, Carney PA, Buist DS, Oestreicher N, Barlow W, Ballard-Barbash R, Taplin SH.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Dec 15;96(24):1832-9.

8.

Prenatal and perinatal correlates of adult mammographic breast density.

Cerhan JR, Sellers TA, Janney CA, Pankratz VS, Brandt KR, Vachon CM.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Jun;14(6):1502-8.

9.

Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.

Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg R, Rutter CM, Geller BM, Abraham LA, Taplin SH, Dignan M, Cutter G, Ballard-Barbash R.

Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 4;138(3):168-75. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2003 May 6;138(9):771.

PMID:
12558355
10.

Mammographic screening in women at increased risk of breast cancer after treatment of Hodgkin's disease.

Kwong A, Hancock SL, Bloom JR, Pal S, Birdwell RL, Mariscal C, Ikeda DM.

Breast J. 2008 Jan-Feb;14(1):39-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00524.x.

PMID:
18186864
11.
12.

Variation in mammographic breast density by time in menstrual cycle among women aged 40-49 years.

White E, Velentgas P, Mandelson MT, Lehman CD, Elmore JG, Porter P, Yasui Y, Taplin SH.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Jun 17;90(12):906-10.

13.

Varying levels of family history of breast cancer in relation to mammographic breast density (United States).

Crest AB, Aiello EJ, Anderson ML, Buist DS.

Cancer Causes Control. 2006 Aug;17(6):843-50.

PMID:
16783612
14.

Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.

Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Cormack JB, Hanna LA, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett LW, D'Orsi CJ, Jong RA, Rebner M, Tosteson AN, Gatsonis CA; DMIST Investigators Group.

Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):376-83. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2461070200.

15.

The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program.

Oestreicher N, Lehman CD, Seger DJ, Buist DS, White E.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Feb;184(2):428-32.

PMID:
15671358
16.
17.

Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.

Morimoto T, Sasa M, Yamaguchi T, Kondo H, Akaiwa H, Sagara Y.

Anticancer Res. 2000 Sep-Oct;20(5C):3689-94.

PMID:
11268440
19.

Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy.

Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, Geller B, Dittus K, Braithwaite D, Wernli KJ, Miglioretti DL, O'Meara ES; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 13;173(9):807-16. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.307.

20.

Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

van Gils CH, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, Hendriks JH, Holland R.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Apr;52(4):267-71.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk