Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Comparison of two imaging programs in predicting the soft tissue changes with mandibular advancement surgery.

Ravindranath S, Krishnaswamy NR, Sundaram V.

Orthodontics (Chic.). 2011 Winter;12(4):354-65.

PMID:
22299108
2.

Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares.

Nadjmi N, Tehranchi A, Azami N, Saedi B, Mollemans W.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Nov;144(5):654-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.06.019.

3.

Soft tissue response and facial symmetry after orthognathic surgery.

Wermker K, Kleinheinz J, Jung S, Dirksen D.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;42(6):e339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.032. Epub 2014 Jan 15.

PMID:
24529350
4.

Surgical prediction of skeletal and soft tissue changes in treatment of Class II.

de Lira Ade L, de Moura WL, Artese F, Bittencourt MA, Nojima LI.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Apr;41(3):198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Nov 30.

PMID:
23201327
5.

The influence of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on submental-cervical aesthetics.

Soydan SS, Uckan S, Ustdal A, Bayram B, Bayrak B.

J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Nov;41(11):816-21. doi: 10.1111/joor.12203. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

PMID:
24946129
6.

Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery.

Magro-Filho O, Magro-Ernica N, Queiroz TP, Aranega AM, Garcia IR Jr.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):452.e1-5; discussion 452-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.027.

PMID:
20362896
7.

Soft tissue changes after maxillo-mandibular advancement in OSAS patients: a three-dimensional study.

Gerbino G, Bianchi FA, Verzé L, Ramieri G.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;42(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

PMID:
23517814
8.

Predicting soft tissue changes in mandibular advancement surgery: a comparison of two video imaging systems.

Syliangco ST, Sameshima GT, Kaminishi RM, Sinclair PM.

Angle Orthod. 1997;67(5):337-46.

PMID:
9347107
9.

The relationship between the changes in three-dimensional facial morphology and mandibular movement after orthognathic surgery.

Kim DS, Huh KH, Lee SS, Heo MS, Choi SC, Hwang SJ, Yi WJ.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Oct;41(7):686-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

PMID:
23465640
10.

Surgical prediction of skeletal and soft tissue changes in Class III treatment.

de Lira Ade L, de Moura WL, de Barros Vieira JM, Nojima MG, Nojima LI.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;70(4):e290-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.001.

PMID:
22449434
12.

Soft tissue outcome after mandibular advancement--an anthropometric evaluation of 171 consecutive patients.

Raschke GF, Rieger UM, Bader RD, Guentsch A, Schaefer O, Schultze-Mosgau S.

Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jun;17(5):1415-23. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0821-2. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

PMID:
22893037
13.

A comparison of current prediction imaging programs.

Smith JD, Thomas PM, Proffit WR.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 May;125(5):527-36.

14.

A more accurate method of predicting soft tissue changes after mandibular setback surgery.

Suh HY, Lee SJ, Lee YS, Donatelli RE, Wheeler TT, Kim SH, Eo SH, Seo BM.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Oct;70(10):e553-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.06.187.

PMID:
22990101
15.

Three-dimensional analyses of facial soft tissue configuration of Japanese females with jaw deformity--a trial of polygonal view of facial soft tissue deformity in orthognathic patients.

Shimomatsu K, Nozoe E, Ishihata K, Okawachi T, Nakamura N.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Oct;40(7):559-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.10.009. Epub 2011 Nov 9.

PMID:
22078498
16.

Evaluation of video imaging prediction in combined maxillary and mandibular orthognathic surgery.

Upton PM, Sadowsky PL, Sarver DM, Heaven TJ.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Dec;112(6):656-65.

PMID:
9423698
17.

Soft tissue profile changes after setback genioplasty in orthognathic surgery patients.

Park JY, Kim MJ, Hwang SJ.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Oct;41(7):657-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

PMID:
23395297
18.

Consideration of effect of the amount of mandibular setback on the submental region in the planning of orthodontic-orthognathic treatment.

Ghassemi M, Hilgers RD, Jamilian A, Hölzle F, Fritz U, Gerressen M, Ghassemi A.

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Apr;52(4):334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Mar 1.

PMID:
24593896
19.

Subjective evaluation of profile prediction using video imaging.

Giangreco TA, Forbes DP, Jacobson RS, Kallal RH, Moretti RJ, Marshall SD.

Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1995;10(3):211-7.

PMID:
9082009
20.

Changes in soft tissue profile after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and retropositioning of the mandible.

Gaggl A, Schultes G, Kärcher H.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 May;57(5):542-6; discussion 546-7.

PMID:
10319828
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk