Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 94

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 22262427)

1.

Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data.

Rolfson O, Rothwell A, Sedrakyan A, Chenok KE, Bohm E, Bozic KJ, Garellick G.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93 Suppl 3:66-71. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01021. Review.

2.

Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in U.S. Total joint replacement registries: rationale, status, and plans.

Franklin PD, Lewallen D, Bozic K, Hallstrom B, Jiranek W, Ayers DC.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Dec 17;96 Suppl 1:104-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00328.

PMID:
25520425
3.

The association between body mass index and the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty.

Baker P, Petheram T, Jameson S, Reed M, Gregg P, Deehan D.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Aug 15;94(16):1501-8.

PMID:
22992819
4.

Health-related quality of life after total joint arthroplasty: a scoping review.

Jones CA, Pohar S.

Clin Geriatr Med. 2012 Aug;28(3):395-429. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2012.06.001. Review.

PMID:
22840305
5.

Patient-reported outcomes in breast oncology: a review of validated outcome instruments.

Kanatas A, Velikova G, Roe B, Horgan K, Ghazali N, Shaw RJ, Rogers SN.

Tumori. 2012 Nov;98(6):678-88. doi: 10.1700/1217.13489. Review.

6.

Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.

DeVine J, Norvell DC, Ecker E, Fourney DR, Vaccaro A, Wang J, Andersson G.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S69-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef6de. Review.

PMID:
21897347
7.

Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery.

Zanoli G.

Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005 Jun;76(318):5-47. Review.

PMID:
16175972
8.

Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain.

Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, Bransford RJ, DeVine J, McGirt MJ, Lee MJ.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S54-68. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef74d. Review.

PMID:
21952190
10.

Ratings of global outcome at the first post-operative assessment after spinal surgery: how often do the surgeon and patient agree?

Lattig F, Grob D, Kleinstueck FS, Porchet F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, O'Riordan D, Mannion AF.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3:386-94. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1028-3. Epub 2009 May 22.

11.

Incorporating patient-reported outcomes in total joint arthroplasty registries: challenges and opportunities.

Franklin PD, Harrold L, Ayers DC.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3482-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3193-2. Review.

12.

Measuring quality of life and patient satisfaction after body contouring: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures.

Reavey PL, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, McCarthy C, Scott A, Rubin JP, Shermak M, Pusic AL.

Aesthet Surg J. 2011 Sep;31(7):807-13. doi: 10.1177/1090820X11417426.

PMID:
21908812
13.

The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice.

Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinst├╝ck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3:367-73. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0942-8. Epub 2009 Mar 25.

14.

Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements.

Copay AG, Martin MM, Subach BR, Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Schuler TC, Berven S.

Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.12.027. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

PMID:
20171937
15.

Outcomes instruments in facial plastic surgery.

Alsarraf R.

Facial Plast Surg. 2002 May;18(2):77-86.

PMID:
12063654
16.

Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels.

Willke RJ, Burke LB, Erickson P.

Control Clin Trials. 2004 Dec;25(6):535-52. Review.

PMID:
15588741
17.

The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Graves SE, Davidson D, Ingerson L, Ryan P, Griffith EC, McDermott BF, McElroy HJ, Pratt NL.

Med J Aust. 2004 Mar 1;180(5 Suppl):S31-4.

PMID:
14984361
18.

The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty.

Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN.

J Rheumatol. 2002 Jun;29(6):1273-9.

PMID:
12064846
19.

The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index.

Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinst├╝ck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3:374-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0931-y. Epub 2009 Mar 19.

20.

The patient's perspective on complications after spine surgery.

Grob D, Mannion AF.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3:380-5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1005-x. Epub 2009 Apr 24.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk