Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 90

1.

Clinical evaluation of cochlear implant sound coding taking into account conjectural masking functions, MP3000™.

Buechner A, Beynon A, Szyfter W, Niemczyk K, Hoppe U, Hey M, Brokx J, Eyles J, Van de Heyning P, Paludetti G, Zarowski A, Quaranta N, Wesarg T, Festen J, Olze H, Dhooge I, Müller-Deile J, Ramos A, Roman S, Piron JP, Cuda D, Burdo S, Grolman W, Vaillard SR, Huarte A, Frachet B, Morera C, Garcia-Ibáñez L, Abels D, Walger M, Müller-Mazotta J, Leone CA, Meyer B, Dillier N, Steffens T, Gentine A, Mazzoli M, Rypkema G, Killian M, Smoorenburg G.

Cochlear Implants Int. 2011 Nov;12(4):194-204. doi: 10.1179/1754762811Y0000000009.

PMID:
22251806
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.
3.

Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance versus preference.

Skinner MW, Arndt PL, Staller SJ.

Ear Hear. 2002 Feb;23(1 Suppl):2S-17S.

PMID:
11883765
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Aug;110(2):1150-63.

PMID:
11519582
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Speech recognition with the nucleus 24 SPEAK, ACE, and CIS speech coding strategies in newly implanted adults.

Skinner MW, Holden LK, Whitford LA, Plant KL, Psarros C, Holden TA.

Ear Hear. 2002 Jun;23(3):207-23.

PMID:
12072613
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy.

Holden LK, Skinner MW, Holden TA, Demorest ME.

Ear Hear. 2002 Oct;23(5):463-76.

PMID:
12411779
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Conversion from the SPEAK to the ACE strategy in children using the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception and speech production outcomes.

Psarros CE, Plant KL, Lee K, Decker JA, Whitford LA, Cowan RS.

Ear Hear. 2002 Feb;23(1 Suppl):18S-27S.

PMID:
11885571
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Comparison of two channel selection criteria for noise suppression in cochlear implants.

Hazrati O, Loizou PC.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Mar;133(3):1615-24. doi: 10.1121/1.4788999.

PMID:
23464031
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
9.

Effects of speech processing strategy on Chinese tone recognition by nucleus-24 cochlear implant users.

Fu QJ, Hsu CJ, Horng MJ.

Ear Hear. 2004 Oct;25(5):501-8.

PMID:
15599196
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Comparison of speech perception benefits with SPEAK and ACE coding strategies in pediatric Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant recipients.

Pasanisi E, Bacciu A, Vincenti V, Guida M, Berghenti MT, Barbot A, Panu F, Bacciu S.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2002 Jun 17;64(2):159-63.

PMID:
12049828
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.

Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Stecker M, Müller-Deile J, Maune S, Dillier N, Weber B, Hey M, Begall K, Lenarz T, Battmer RD, Böhm M, Steffens T, Strutz J, Linder T, Probst R, Allum J, Westhofen M, Doering W.

Otol Neurotol. 2004 Nov;25(6):958-68.

PMID:
15547426
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Maximizing the spectral and temporal benefits of two clinically used sound processing strategies for cochlear implants.

Won JH, Nie K, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT.

Trends Amplif. 2012 Dec;16(4):201-10. doi: 10.1177/1084713812467855.

PMID:
23264570
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
13.

Development of a temporal fundamental frequency coding strategy for cochlear implants.

Vandali AE, van Hoesel RJ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jun;129(6):4023-36. doi: 10.1121/1.3573988.

PMID:
21682423
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users.

Srinivasan AG, Padilla M, Shannon RV, Landsberger DM.

Hear Res. 2013 May;299:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 1.

PMID:
23467170
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
15.

Comodulation masking release induced by controlled electrical stimulation of auditory nerve fibers.

Zirn S, Hempel JM, Schuster M, Hemmert W.

Hear Res. 2013 Feb;296:60-6. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.11.023. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

PMID:
23220120
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Comparison of continuous interleaved sampling and simultaneous analog stimulation speech processing strategies in newly implanted adults with a Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.

Zwolan TA, Kileny PR, Smith S, Waltzman S, Chute P, Domico E, Firszt J, Hodges A, Mills D, Whearty M, Osberger MJ, Fisher L.

Otol Neurotol. 2005 May;26(3):455-65.

PMID:
15891649
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Goldsworthy RL, Delhorne LA, Braida LD, Reed CM.

Trends Amplif. 2013 Mar;17(1):27-44. doi: 10.1177/1084713813477244. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

PMID:
23429419
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Spatial tuning curves from apical, middle, and basal electrodes in cochlear implant users.

Nelson DA, Kreft HA, Anderson ES, Donaldson GS.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jun;129(6):3916-33. doi: 10.1121/1.3583503.

PMID:
21682414
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
19.

Consonant recognition as a function of the number of stimulation channels in the Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant.

Reiss LA, Turner CW, Karsten SA, Erenberg SR, Taylor J, Gantz BJ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):3406-17. doi: 10.1121/1.4757735.

PMID:
23145621
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
20.

Combined spectral and temporal enhancement to improve cochlear-implant speech perception.

Bhattacharya A, Vandali A, Zeng FG.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):2951-60. doi: 10.1121/1.3641401.

PMID:
22087923
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk