Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 161

1.

Repair of subtotal tympanic membrane perforation by ultrathin cartilage shield: evaluation of take rate and hearing result.

Mokbel KM, Thabet el-SM.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jan;270(1):33-6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1903-5. Epub 2011 Dec 31.

PMID:
22210476
2.

Functional results of temporalis fascia versus cartilage tympanoplasty in patients with bilateral chronic otitis media.

Onal K, Arslanoglu S, Songu M, Demiray U, Demirpehlivan IA.

J Laryngol Otol. 2012 Jan;126(1):22-5. doi: 10.1017/S0022215111002817. Epub 2011 Oct 28.

PMID:
22032518
3.

Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty.

Demirpehlivan IA, Onal K, Arslanoglu S, Songu M, Ciger E, Can N.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Mar;268(3):471-4. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1473-y. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

PMID:
21267588
4.
5.

Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia.

Tek A, Karaman M, Uslu C, Habeşoğlu T, Kılıçarslan Y, Durmuş R, Esen S, Egeli E.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Apr;269(4):1117-26. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1779-4. Epub 2011 Oct 4.

PMID:
21968630
6.

Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforations: a comparison with the temporalis fascia technique.

Kazikdas KC, Onal K, Boyraz I, Karabulut E.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Sep;264(9):985-9. Epub 2007 Mar 31.

PMID:
17401572
8.
9.
10.

Randomized study comparing fascia and cartilage grafts in myringoplasty.

Yung M, Vivekanandan S, Smith P.

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011 Aug;120(8):535-41.

PMID:
21922978
11.

Fascia versus cartilage graft in type I tympanoplasty: audiological outcome.

Kim JY, Oh JH, Lee HH.

J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Nov;23(6):e605-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826c7b55.

PMID:
23172493
12.

Type I tympanoplasty with island chondro-perichondral tragal graft: the preferred technique?

De Seta E, De Seta D, Covelli E, Viccaro M, Filipo R.

J Laryngol Otol. 2013 Apr;127(4):354-8. doi: 10.1017/S0022215113000121. Epub 2013 Feb 25.

PMID:
23433000
13.

Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty in children.

Couloigner V, Baculard F, El Bakkouri W, Viala P, François M, Narcy P, Van Den Abbeele T.

Otol Neurotol. 2005 Mar;26(2):247-51.

PMID:
15793413
14.

Perichondrium/cartilage composite graft for repairing large tympanic membrane perforations and hearing improvement.

Chen XW, Yang H, Gao RZ, Yu R, Gao ZQ.

Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Feb 5;123(3):301-4.

15.

Effect of type I tympanoplasty on the resonant frequency of the middle ear: comparison between chondrotympanoplasty and temporalis fascia grafting.

Iacovou E, Vlastarakos PV, Panagiotakopoulou A, Chrysostomou M, Kandiloros D, Adamopoulos G, Ferekidis E.

J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Feb;41(1):14-9.

PMID:
22498263
16.

Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty (Eavey technique) modified for adults.

Lubianca-Neto JF.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Oct;123(4):492-4.

PMID:
11020192
17.

[Tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy in patients with large perforation of tympanic membrane in pars tensa].

Xia R, Han C, Yu L.

Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2005 May;19(10):439-41. Chinese.

PMID:
16108318
18.

A novel technique for reconstruction of the posterior wall of the external auditory canal and tympanum using pedicled temporalis myofascia.

Yu F.

Acta Otolaryngol. 2013 Jul;133(7):699-707. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2013.767987. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

PMID:
23441810
19.

Medial or medio-lateral graft tympanoplasty for repair of tympanic membrane perforation.

Jung T, Kim YH, Kim YH, Park SK, Martin D.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jul;73(7):941-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 Apr 28.

PMID:
19403180
20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk