Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 127

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 22197402)

1.

Comparison of NASCET and WASID criteria for the measurement of intracranial stenosis using digital subtraction and computed tomography angiography of the middle cerebral artery.

Huang J, Degnan AJ, Liu Q, Teng Z, Yue CS, Gillard JH, Lu JP.

J Neuroradiol. 2012 Dec;39(5):342-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2011.11.005. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

2.

Comparison of high-resolution MRI with CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography for the evaluation of middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease.

Liu Q, Huang J, Degnan AJ, Chen S, Gillard JH, Teng Z, Lu J.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Oct;29(7):1491-8. doi: 10.1007/s10554-013-0237-3. Epub 2013 May 19.

PMID:
23686460
3.

Reproducibility of Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis Measurements by DSA: Comparison of the NASCET and WASID Methods.

Chen L, Zhan Q, Ma C, Liu Q, Zhang X, Tian X, Jiang Y, Dong Y, Chen S, Lu J.

PLoS One. 2015 Jun 26;10(6):e0130991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130991. eCollection 2015.

4.

Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography with matched mask bone elimination for detection of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography.

Romijn M, Gratama van Andel HA, van Walderveen MA, Sprengers ME, van Rijn JC, van Rooij WJ, Venema HW, Grimbergen CA, den Heeten GJ, Majoie CB.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Jan;29(1):134-9. Epub 2007 Oct 10.

5.

Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.

Zhang LJ, Wu SY, Niu JB, Zhang ZL, Wang HZ, Zhao YE, Chai X, Zhou CS, Lu GM.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jan;194(1):23-30. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2290.

PMID:
20028901
6.

Grading of carotid artery stenosis with multidetector-row CT angiography: visual estimation or caliper measurements?

Waaijer A, Weber M, van Leeuwen MS, Kardux J, Veldhuis WB, Lo R, Beek FJ, Prokop M.

Eur Radiol. 2009 Dec;19(12):2809-18. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1508-1. Epub 2009 Jul 18.

7.

Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography compared to digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis of intracranial stenosis and its impact on clinical decision-making.

Duffis EJ, Jethwa P, Gupta G, Bonello K, Gandhi CD, Prestigiacomo CJ.

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Oct;22(7):1013-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.02.016. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

PMID:
22464276
8.

Velocity criteria for intracranial stenosis revisited: an international multicenter study of transcranial Doppler and digital subtraction angiography.

Zhao L, Barlinn K, Sharma VK, Tsivgoulis G, Cava LF, Vasdekis SN, Teoh HL, Triantafyllou N, Chan BP, Sharma A, Voumvourakis K, Stamboulis E, Saqqur M, Harrigan MR, Albright KC, Alexandrov AV.

Stroke. 2011 Dec;42(12):3429-34. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.621235. Epub 2011 Sep 29.

9.

How accurate is CT angiography in evaluating intracranial atherosclerotic disease?

Nguyen-Huynh MN, Wintermark M, English J, Lam J, Vittinghoff E, Smith WS, Johnston SC.

Stroke. 2008 Apr;39(4):1184-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.502906. Epub 2008 Feb 21.

10.

Automated subtraction CT angiography for visualization of the whole brain vasculature: a feasibility study.

Li Q, Lv F, Wei Y, Luo T, Xie P.

Acad Radiol. 2013 Aug;20(8):1009-14. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

PMID:
23746383
11.

Selection of arterial input function for postprocessing of cerebral ct perfusion in chronic unilateral high-grade stenosis or occlusion of the carotid or middle cerebral artery.

Chiu FY, Teng MM, Kao YH, Chen YD, Luo CB, Chang FC, Guo WY, Chang CY.

Acad Radiol. 2012 Jan;19(1):8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

PMID:
22054803
12.
13.

Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.

Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, Duyme M, Sahel M, Zouaoui A, Marsault C.

Radiology. 2001 Jul;220(1):179-85.

PMID:
11425993
14.

Digital subtraction CT angiography for detection of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography.

Lu L, Zhang LJ, Poon CS, Wu SY, Zhou CS, Luo S, Wang M, Lu GM.

Radiology. 2012 Feb;262(2):605-12. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110486. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

PMID:
22143927
15.

Accuracy of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score during the first 3 hours of middle cerebral artery stroke: comparison of noncontrast CT, CT angiography source images, and CT perfusion.

Lin K, Rapalino O, Law M, Babb JS, Siller KA, Pramanik BK.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 May;29(5):931-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0975. Epub 2008 Feb 13.

16.

Automatic lumen segmentation in calcified plaques: dual-energy CT versus standard reconstructions in comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

Thomas C, Korn A, Ketelsen D, Danz S, Tsifikas I, Claussen CD, Ernemann U, Heuschmid M.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jun;194(6):1590-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3550.

PMID:
20489101
17.

[An evaluation of the carotid bifurcation and of the intracranial circle by angio-spiral computed tomography].

Bozzao A, Floris R, Villani A, Varrucciu V, Baviera ME, Simonetti G.

Radiol Med. 1998 Jun;95(6):577-82. Italian.

PMID:
9717538
18.

Comparison of the accuracy of subtraction CT angiography performed on 320-detector row volume CT with conventional CT angiography for diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms.

Luo Z, Wang D, Sun X, Zhang T, Liu F, Dong D, Chan NK, Shen B.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jan;81(1):118-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 May 31.

PMID:
21632193
19.

Detection of intracranial aneurysms with 64 channel multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

Pozzi-Mucelli F, Bruni S, Doddi M, Calgaro A, Braini M, Cova M.

Eur J Radiol. 2007 Oct;64(1):15-26. Epub 2007 Apr 6.

PMID:
17412544
20.

Cranial computed tomography angiography with automated bone subtraction: a feasibility study.

Lell MM, Ruehm SG, Kramer M, Panknin C, Habibi R, Klotz E, Villablanca P.

Invest Radiol. 2009 Jan;44(1):38-43. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31818c3d6b.

PMID:
18836384
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk