Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 184

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 22167074)

1.

Methodology of clinical nutrition guidelines for adult cancer patients: how good are they according to AGREE criteria?

van den Berg T, Engelhardt EG, Haanstra TM, Langius JA, van Tulder MW.

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012 May;36(3):316-22. doi: 10.1177/0148607111414027. Epub 2011 Dec 13. Review.

PMID:
22167074
2.

Comment on van den Berg et al: "methodology of clinical nutrition guidelines for adult cancer patients: how good are they according to AGREE criteria?".

Schütz T, Koller M, Arends J, Weimann A, Lochs H.

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012 Sep;36(5):504; author reply 504-5. doi: 10.1177/0148607112453333. Epub 2012 Jul 10. No abstract available.

PMID:
22785442
3.

Assessment of the scope and quality of clinical practice guidelines in lung cancer.

Harpole LH, Kelley MJ, Schreiber G, Toloza EM, Kolimaga J, McCrory DC.

Chest. 2003 Jan;123(1 Suppl):7S-20S. Review.

PMID:
12527562
4.

Systematic review of the methodological quality of clinical guideline development for the management of chronic disease in Europe.

Knai C, Brusamento S, Legido-Quigley H, Saliba V, Panteli D, Turk E, Car J, McKee M, Busse R.

Health Policy. 2012 Oct;107(2-3):157-67. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 12. Review.

PMID:
22795610
5.

Quality of clinical practice guidelines in dermatological oncology.

de Haas ER, de Vijlder HC, van Reesema WS, van Everdingen JJ, Neumann HA.

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007 Oct;21(9):1193-8.

PMID:
17894704
6.

Analysis of the quality of clinical practice guidelines on established ischemic stroke.

Navarro Puerto MA, Ibarluzea IG, Ruiz OG, Alvarez FM, Herreros RG, Pintiado RE, Dominguez AR, León IM.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Summer;24(3):333-41. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080446. Review.

PMID:
18601802
7.

Guidelines in cardiac clinical practice: evaluation of their methodological quality using the AGREE II instrument.

Sabharwal S, Patel V, Nijjer SS, Kirresh A, Darzi A, Chambers JC, Malik I, Kooner JS, Athanasiou T.

J R Soc Med. 2013 Aug;106(8):315-22. doi: 10.1177/0141076813486261. Epub 2013 May 28. Review.

PMID:
23759888
8.

Quality evaluation of guidelines on genetic screening, surveillance and management of hereditary colorectal cancer.

Simone B, De Feo E, Nicolotti N, Ricciardi W, Boccia S.

Eur J Public Health. 2012 Dec;22(6):914-20. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr166. Epub 2011 Dec 2.

9.

Evidence-based guidelines in the evaluation of work disability: an international survey and a comparison of quality of development.

de Boer WE, Bruinvels DJ, Rijkenberg AM, Donceel P, Anema JR.

BMC Public Health. 2009 Sep 18;9:349. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-349.

10.

Quality of stroke rehabilitation clinical practice guidelines.

Hurdowar A, Graham ID, Bayley M, Harrison M, Wood-Dauphinee S, Bhogal S.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;13(4):657-64.

PMID:
17683311
11.

A critical review of guidelines for low back pain treatment.

Arnau JM, Vallano A, Lopez A, Pellisé F, Delgado MJ, Prat N.

Eur Spine J. 2006 May;15(5):543-53. Epub 2005 Oct 11. Review.

12.

The methodological quality of clinical guidelines of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE).

Nelen WL, van der Pluijm RW, Hermens RP, Bergh C, de Sutter P, Nygren KG, Wetzels AM, Grol RP, Kremer JA.

Hum Reprod. 2008 Aug;23(8):1786-92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den120. Epub 2008 May 13.

13.

Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Schmidt S, Follmann M, Malek N, Manns MP, Greten TF.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Dec;26(12):1779-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06891.x.

PMID:
21875430
14.

Comparison of international guideline programs to evaluate and update the Dutch program for clinical guideline development in physical therapy.

Van der Wees PJ, Hendriks EJ, Custers JW, Burgers JS, Dekker J, de Bie RA.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Nov 23;7:191.

15.
16.

Quality of guidelines for the laboratory management of diabetes mellitus.

Horvath AR, Nagy E, Watine J.

Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 2005;240:41-50.

PMID:
16112959
17.

International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument.

Burgers JS, Fervers B, Haugh M, Brouwers M, Browman G, Philip T, Cluzeau FA.

J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 15;22(10):2000-7.

18.

An independent AGREE evaluation of the Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines.

Cates JR, Young DN, Bowerman DS, Porter RC.

Spine J. 2006 Jan-Feb;6(1):72-7.

PMID:
16413451
19.
20.

A review of quality assessment of the methodology used in guidelines and systematic reviews on oral mucositis.

Potting C, Mistiaen P, Poot E, Blijlevens N, Donnelly P, van Achterberg T.

J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jan;18(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02493.x. Review.

PMID:
19120727
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk