Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 107

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 22142404)

1.

Margin status after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and the index lesion: implications for preoperative evaluation of tumor focality in prostate cancer.

Karavitakis M, Ahmed HU, Abel PD, Hazell S, Winkler MH.

J Endourol. 2012 May;26(5):503-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0345. Epub 2012 Feb 8.

PMID:
22142404
2.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: current evaluation of surgical margins in clinically low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer.

Yee DS, Narula N, Amin MB, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE.

J Endourol. 2009 Sep;23(9):1461-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0144.

PMID:
19619065
3.

Apical surgical margins status in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not depend on disease characteristics.

Tsivian M, Zilberman DE, Ferrandino MN, Madden JF, Mouraviev V, Albala DM.

J Endourol. 2012 Apr;26(4):361-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0336. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

PMID:
22192106
4.

A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R, Cookson MS.

J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. Epub 2007 Oct 22.

PMID:
17936849
5.

Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.

Albadine R, Hyndman ME, Chaux A, Jeong JY, Saab S, Tavora F, Epstein JI, Gonzalgo ML, Pavlovich CP, Netto GJ.

Hum Pathol. 2012 Feb;43(2):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.04.029. Epub 2011 Aug 4.

PMID:
21820147
6.

Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical perineal prostatectomy.

Goetzl MA, Krebill R, Griebling TL, Thrasher JB.

Can J Urol. 2009 Apr;16(2):4553-7.

PMID:
19364427
7.
8.

Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Secin FP, Serio A, Bianco FJ Jr, Karanikolas NT, Kuroiwa K, Vickers A, Touijer K, Guillonneau B.

Eur Urol. 2007 Mar;51(3):764-71. Epub 2006 Nov 3.

PMID:
17098356
9.

Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate.

Brown JA, Rodin DM, Harisinghani M, Dahl DM.

Urol Oncol. 2009 Mar-Apr;27(2):174-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.04.009. Epub 2008 Jul 21.

PMID:
18640062
10.

The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Link BA, Nelson R, Josephson DY, Yoshida JS, Crocitto LE, Kawachi MH, Wilson TG.

J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):928-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.029. Epub 2008 Jul 17.

PMID:
18635217
11.

Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate decreases positive margin rate while ensuring nerve sparing procedure during radical prostatectomy.

von Bodman C, Brock M, Roghmann F, Byers A, Löppenberg B, Braun K, Pastor J, Sommerer F, Noldus J, Palisaar RJ.

J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):515-20. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.011. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

PMID:
23415965
12.

Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.

Ploussard G, Agamy MA, Alenda O, Allory Y, Mouracade P, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, de la Taille A, Salomon L.

BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.

PMID:
20883488
13.

Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.

Koutlidis N, Mourey E, Champigneulle J, Mangin P, Cormier L.

Int J Urol. 2012 Dec;19(12):1076-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03102.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

PMID:
22860572
14.

Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer.

Salomon L, Anastasiadis AG, Levrel O, Katz R, Saint F, de la Taille A, Cicco A, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou CC.

Urology. 2003 Feb;61(2):386-90.

PMID:
12597953
15.

Prostate weight: an independent predictor for positive surgical margins during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Msezane LP, Gofrit ON, Lin S, Shalhav AL, Zagaja GP, Zorn KC.

Can J Urol. 2007 Oct;14(5):3697-701.

PMID:
17949525
16.

The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.

Trabulsi EJ, Linden RA, Gomella LG, McGinnis DE, Strup SE, Lallas CD.

Can J Urol. 2008 Apr;15(2):3994-9.

PMID:
18405448
17.

Extrafascial versus interfascial nerve-sparing technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of functional outcomes and positive surgical margins characteristics.

Shikanov S, Woo J, Al-Ahmadie H, Katz MH, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL, Zorn KC.

Urology. 2009 Sep;74(3):611-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.092. Epub 2009 Jul 18.

PMID:
19616830
18.

[The low weight of the prostate is an independent risk factor for positive surgical margins on radical prostatectomy specimens].

Descazeaud A, Zerbib M, Vieillefond A, Debré B, Peyromaure M.

Prog Urol. 2007 Apr;17(2):203-7. French.

PMID:
17489319
19.
20.

Assessment of the risk of positive surgical margins with pelvic phased-array magnetic resonance imaging in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a prospective study.

Soulié M, Aziza R, Escourrou G, Seguin P, Tollon C, Molinier L, Bachaud J, Joffre F, Plante P.

Urology. 2001 Aug;58(2):228-32.

PMID:
11489708
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk