Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 93

1.

Statistical issues with the analysis of nonrandomized studies in comparative effectiveness research.

Alemayehu D, Alvir JM, Jones B, Willke RJ.

J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(9 Suppl A):S22-6. No abstract available.

PMID:
22074671
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
2.

Regulatory considerations in the design of comparative observational studies using propensity scores.

Yue LQ.

J Biopharm Stat. 2012;22(6):1272-9. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2012.715111.

PMID:
23075022
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Bias in comparative effectiveness studies due to regional variation in medical practice intensity: a legitimate concern, or much ado about nothing?

Huybrechts KF, Seeger JD, Rothman KJ, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Schneeweiss S.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):e61-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
22991351
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
4.

"Ten commandments" for conducting comparative effectiveness research using "real-world data".

Willke RJ, Mullins CD.

J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(9 Suppl A):S10-5. No abstract available.

PMID:
22074669
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
6.

Minimizing bias due to confounding by indication in comparative effectiveness research: the importance of restriction.

Psaty BM, Siscovick DS.

JAMA. 2010 Aug 25;304(8):897-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1205. No abstract available.

PMID:
20736474
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

On the limitations of comparative effectiveness research.

Rubin DB.

Stat Med. 2010 Aug 30;29(19):1991-5; discussion 1996-7. doi: 10.1002/sim.3960. No abstract available.

PMID:
20683890
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Proceedings of the University of Pennsylvania annual conference on statistical issues in clinical trials: statistical issues in comparative effectiveness research.

Ellenberg JH, Ellenberg SS.

Clin Trials. 2012 Feb;9(1):5. doi: 10.1177/1740774511433045. No abstract available.

PMID:
22334462
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

When should we believe nonrandomized studies of comparative effectiveness?

Hennessy S.

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Dec;90(6):764-6. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.243.

PMID:
22089339
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Comparative effectiveness research: guidelines for good practices are just the beginning.

Johnson ML, Chitnis AS.

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Feb;11(1):51-7. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.93.

PMID:
21351858
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Mitigating systematic measurement error in comparative effectiveness research in heterogeneous populations.

Carle AC.

Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S68-74. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d59557.

PMID:
20473212
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

The incident user design in comparative effectiveness research.

Johnson ES, Bartman BA, Briesacher BA, Fleming NS, Gerhard T, Kornegay CJ, Nourjah P, Sauer B, Schumock GT, Sedrakyan A, Stürmer T, West SL, Schneeweiss S.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Jan;22(1):1-6. doi: 10.1002/pds.3334. Epub 2012 Oct 1. Review.

PMID:
23023988
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Choosing among techniques for quantifying single-case intervention effectiveness.

Manolov R, Solanas A, Sierra V, Evans JJ.

Behav Ther. 2011 Sep;42(3):533-45. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.12.003. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

PMID:
21658534
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

A framework for evidence evaluation and methodological issues in implantable device studies.

Sedrakyan A, Marinac-Dabic D, Normand SL, Mushlin A, Gross T.

Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S121-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d991c4.

PMID:
20421824
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

The promise of comparative effectiveness research.

Sullivan P, Goldmann D.

JAMA. 2011 Jan 26;305(4):400-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.12. No abstract available.

PMID:
21266687
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Perioperative comparative effectiveness research.

Memtsoudis SG, Besculides MC.

Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;25(4):535-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2011.08.004. Review.

PMID:
22099919
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.
19.

Issues related to subgroup analysis in clinical trials.

Cui L, Hung HM, Wang SJ, Tsong Y.

J Biopharm Stat. 2002 Aug;12(3):347-58.

PMID:
12448576
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Some comments on meta-analysis: discussion of "issues specific to evaluation of studies of periodontitis".

Kent R.

J Periodontal Res. 1992 Jul;27(4 Pt 2):445-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
1507034
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk