Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 84

1.

Response to letter from Ms Jane Shipley.

Turner JA, Hollingworth W, Comstock B, Deyo RA.

Med Care. 2012 Jan;50(1):107. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182009857. No abstract available.

PMID:
22052297
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.
3.

Comparative effectiveness research and policy: experiences conducting a coverage with evidence development study of a therapeutic device.

Turner JA, Hollingworth W, Comstock B, Deyo RA.

Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S129-36. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d9e622.

PMID:
20473203
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Methodological challenges of comparative effectiveness research in pain: implications for investigators, clinicians, and policy makers.

Bellows BK, Biskupiak J.

J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2011;25(3):267-74. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2011.599482.

PMID:
21882980
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Comments on 'Comparative effectiveness research: Policy context, methods development and research infrastructure'.

Morton SC.

Stat Med. 2010 Aug 30;29(19):1989-90; discussion 1996-7. doi: 10.1002/sim.3926. No abstract available.

PMID:
20683889
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Maximizing the clinical utility of comparative effectiveness research.

Umscheid CA.

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Dec;88(6):876-9. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.200. Epub 2010 Oct 20. Review.

PMID:
20962776
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

[Toward a comparative effectiveness policy in Italy].

Perucci CA.

Epidemiol Prev. 2011 Mar-Apr;35(2):77-9. Italian. No abstract available.

PMID:
21628748
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Making observational studies count: shaping the future of comparative effectiveness research.

Dreyer NA.

Epidemiology. 2011 May;22(3):295-7. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182126569. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
21464648
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Prioritizing comparative-effectiveness research topics via stakeholder involvement: an application in COPD.

Pickard AS, Lee TA, Solem CT, Joo MJ, Schumock GT, Krishnan JA.

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Dec;90(6):888-92. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.237. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

PMID:
22048220
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

New trends in technology assessment: will comparative-effectiveness research and healthcare reform stifle medical device innovation?

Gross L.

J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Oct-Dec;33(4):350-6. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181f533ef. No abstract available.

PMID:
20838114
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

[ON THE TRANSISTORIZATION OF STIMULATOR THERAPY EQUIPMENT].

VODOVNIK L.

Elektromed Biomed Tech. 1964 Mar;9:28-30. German. No abstract available.

PMID:
14184839
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research.

Dreyer NA, Tunis SR, Berger M, Ollendorf D, Mattox P, Gliklich R.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1818-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0666.

PMID:
20921481
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
13.

On the limitations of comparative effectiveness research.

Rubin DB.

Stat Med. 2010 Aug 30;29(19):1991-5; discussion 1996-7. doi: 10.1002/sim.3960. No abstract available.

PMID:
20683890
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Medical device pain relievers.

Hill J.

Biomed Instrum Technol. 2008 Jul-Aug;42(4):281-2. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205(2008)42[281:MDPR]2.0.CO;2. No abstract available.

PMID:
18662061
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Comparative effectiveness research.

Murphy JF.

Ir Med J. 2011 May;104(5):132. No abstract available.

PMID:
21736084
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Advancing methods for comparative effectiveness research.

Smith SR.

Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S1-2. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181e1cde5. No abstract available.

PMID:
20473186
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Comparative effectiveness research in the era of health reform.

Carey T.

N C Med J. 2010 May-Jun;71(3):263-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
20681500
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Comparative effectiveness research: critically intertwined with health care reform and the future of biomedical innovation.

Murray RK, McElwee NE.

Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 12;170(7):596-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.50. No abstract available.

PMID:
20386002
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

On guidelines for comparative effectiveness research using nonrandomized studies in secondary data sources.

Schneeweiss S.

Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1041. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00607.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10. No abstract available.

PMID:
19744290
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Engraving marble and comparative effectiveness reviews.

Braillon A.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1468-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.007. No abstract available.

PMID:
22032758
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk