Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 86

1.

Parametric Diffuse Optical Imaging in Reflectance Geometry.

Liu J, Li A, Cerussi AE, Tromberg BJ.

IEEE J Quantum Electron. 2010;16(3):555-564.

3.

Comparison of imaging geometries for diffuse optical tomography of tissue.

Pogue B, McBride T, Osterberg U, Paulsen K.

Opt Express. 1999 Apr 12;4(8):270-86.

PMID:
19396284
4.

Portable, Fiber-Based, Diffuse Reflection Spectroscopy (DRS) Systems for Estimating Tissue Optical Properties.

Vishwanath K, Chang K, Klein D, Deng YF, Chang V, Phelps JE, Ramanujam N.

Appl Spectrosc. 2011 Feb 1;62(2):206-215.

5.
6.

Estimation and statistical bounds for three-dimensional polar shapes in diffuse optical tomography.

Boverman G, Miller EL, Brooks DH, Isaacson D, Fang Q, Boas DA.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Jun;27(6):752-65. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2007.911492.

7.

Time-domain reflectance diffuse optical tomography with Mellin-Laplace transform for experimental detection and depth localization of a single absorbing inclusion.

Puszka A, Hervé L, Planat-Chrétien A, Koenig A, Derouard J, Dinten JM.

Biomed Opt Express. 2013 Apr 1;4(4):569-83. doi: 10.1364/BOE.4.000569. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

8.

Fast imaging of high-resolution two-dimensional effective attenuation profile from diffuse reflectance.

Tse J, Chen LK.

J Biomed Opt. 2012 Apr;17(4):046005. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.4.046005.

PMID:
22559683
9.

Singular value decomposition metrics show limitations of detector design in diffuse fluorescence tomography.

Leblond F, Tichauer KM, Pogue BW.

Biomed Opt Express. 2010 Nov 29;1(5):1514-1531.

10.

Spatially resolved absolute diffuse reflectance measurements for noninvasive determination of the optical scattering and absorption coefficients of biological tissue.

Kienle A, Lilge L, Patterson MS, Hibst R, Steiner R, Wilson BC.

Appl Opt. 1996 May 1;35(13):2304-14. doi: 10.1364/AO.35.002304.

PMID:
21085367
11.

Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data.

Kamasak ME, Bouman CA, Morris ED, Sauer K.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 May;24(5):636-50.

PMID:
15889551
12.

Linear image reconstruction for a diffuse optical mammography system in a noncompressed geometry using scattering fluid.

Nielsen T, Brendel B, Ziegler R, van Beek M, Uhlemann F, Bontus C, Koehler T.

Appl Opt. 2009 Apr 1;48(10):D1-13.

PMID:
19340097
13.

Spatially resolved reflectance spectroscopy for diagnosis of cervical precancer: Monte Carlo modeling and comparison to clinical measurements.

Arifler D, MacAulay C, Follen M, Richards-Kortum R.

J Biomed Opt. 2006 Nov-Dec;11(6):064027.

PMID:
17212550
14.

Diffuse optical tomography with a priori anatomical information.

Guven M, Yazici B, Intes X, Chance B.

Phys Med Biol. 2005 Jun 21;50(12):2837-58. Epub 2005 Jun 1.

PMID:
15930606
16.

A random-effects model for group-level analysis of diffuse optical brain imaging.

Abdelnour F, Huppert T.

Biomed Opt Express. 2010 Nov 30;2(1):1-25. doi: 10.1364/BOE.2.000001.

17.

Effects of ray profile modeling on resolution recovery in clinical CT.

Hofmann C, Knaup M, Kachelrieß M.

Med Phys. 2014 Feb;41(2):021907. doi: 10.1118/1.4862510.

PMID:
24506628
18.

Handheld Diffuse Reflectance Spectral Imaging (DRSi) for in-vivo characterization of skin.

Bish SF, Sharma M, Wang Y, Triesault NJ, Reichenberg JS, Zhang JX, Tunnell JW.

Biomed Opt Express. 2014 Jan 24;5(2):573-86. doi: 10.1364/BOE.5.000573. eCollection 2014 Feb 1.

19.
20.

Discretization error analysis and adaptive meshing algorithms for fluorescence diffuse optical tomography in the presence of measurement noise.

Zhou L, Yazici B.

IEEE Trans Image Process. 2011 Apr;20(4):1094-111. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2010.2083677. Epub 2010 Oct 4.

PMID:
20923735
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk