Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 151

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 22048319)

1.

Categorizing natural objects: a comparison of the visual and the haptic modalities.

Gaissert N, Wallraven C.

Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jan;216(1):123-34. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2916-4. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

PMID:
22048319
2.

Similarity and categorization: from vision to touch.

Gaissert N, Bülthoff HH, Wallraven C.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):219-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

PMID:
21752344
3.

Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects.

Cooke T, Jäkel F, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH.

Neuropsychologia. 2007 Feb 1;45(3):484-95. Epub 2006 Mar 31.

PMID:
16580027
4.

Visual and haptic perceptual spaces show high similarity in humans.

Gaissert N, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH.

J Vis. 2010 Sep 2;10(11):2. doi: 10.1167/10.11.2.

PMID:
20884497
5.

Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson's "feelies".

Norman JF, Phillips F, Holmin JS, Norman HF, Beers AM, Boswell AM, Cheeseman JR, Stethen AG, Ronning C.

Exp Brain Res. 2012 Oct;222(3):321-32. Epub 2012 Aug 25.

PMID:
22918607
6.

Transfer of object category knowledge across visual and haptic modalities: experimental and computational studies.

Yildirim I, Jacobs RA.

Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):135-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

PMID:
23102553
7.

The eyes grasp, the hands see: metric category knowledge transfers between vision and touch.

Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH, Waterkamp S, van Dam L, Gaissert N.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Aug;21(4):976-85. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0563-4.

PMID:
24307250
8.

Touching on face space: comparing visual and haptic processing of face shapes.

Wallraven C.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Aug;21(4):995-1002. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0577-y.

PMID:
24420727
9.

Haptic categorical perception of shape.

Gaißert N, Waterkamp S, Fleming RW, Bülthoff I.

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043062. Epub 2012 Aug 10.

10.

Functional specialization and convergence in the occipito-temporal cortex supporting haptic and visual identification of human faces and body parts: an fMRI study.

Kitada R, Johnsrude IS, Kochiyama T, Lederman SJ.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Oct;21(10):2027-45. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21115.

PMID:
18823255
12.

Visual and haptic representations of material properties.

Baumgartner E, Wiebel CB, Gegenfurtner KR.

Multisens Res. 2013;26(5):429-55.

PMID:
24649528
13.

Haptic perception and body representation in lateral and medial occipito-temporal cortices.

Costantini M, Urgesi C, Galati G, Romani GL, Aglioti SM.

Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):821-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.034. Epub 2011 Feb 21.

PMID:
21316376
14.

Size-sensitive perceptual representations underlie visual and haptic object recognition.

Craddock M, Lawson R.

PLoS One. 2009 Nov 24;4(11):e8009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008009.

15.

Visual and Haptic Shape Processing in the Human Brain: Unisensory Processing, Multisensory Convergence, and Top-Down Influences.

Lee Masson H, Bulthé J, Op de Beeck HP, Wallraven C.

Cereb Cortex. 2015 Jul 28. pii: bhv170. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
26223258
16.

Efficient visual recalibration from either visual or haptic feedback: the importance of being wrong.

Adams WJ, Kerrigan IS, Graf EW.

J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 3;30(44):14745-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2749-10.2010.

17.

The left fusiform gyrus hosts trisensory representations of manipulable objects.

Kassuba T, Klinge C, Hölig C, Menz MM, Ptito M, Röder B, Siebner HR.

Neuroimage. 2011 Jun 1;56(3):1566-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.032. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

PMID:
21334444
18.

Object and spatial imagery dimensions in visuo-haptic representations.

Lacey S, Lin JB, Sathian K.

Exp Brain Res. 2011 Sep;213(2-3):267-73. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2623-1. Epub 2011 Mar 19.

19.

Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP.

Murata A, Gallese V, Luppino G, Kaseda M, Sakata H.

J Neurophysiol. 2000 May;83(5):2580-601.

20.

Similarity relations in visual search predict rapid visual categorization.

Mohan K, Arun SP.

J Vis. 2012 Oct 23;12(11):19. doi: 10.1167/12.11.19.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk