Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 118

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 22038174)

1.

The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial?

Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Greidanus NV, Bohm ER, Petrak MJ, Della Valle CJ, Gross AE.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):351-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2146-x.

2.

Low early and late dislocation rates with 36- and 40-mm heads in patients at high risk for dislocation.

Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb;471(2):439-43. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2379-3.

3.

High dislocation cumulative risk in THA versus hemiarthroplasty for fractures.

Poignard A, Bouhou M, Pidet O, Flouzat-Lachaniette CH, Hernigou P.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov;469(11):3148-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1987-7. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

4.

Constrained liner in neurologic or cognitively impaired patients undergoing primary THA.

Hernigou P, Filippini P, Flouzat-Lachaniette CH, Batista SU, Poignard A.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Dec;468(12):3255-62. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1340-6.

5.

Is an algorithmic approach to the treatment of recurrent dislocation after THA effective?

Saadat E, Diekmann G, Takemoto S, Ries MD.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):482-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2101-x.

6.

The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):318-25. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1029-x. Epub 2009 Aug 21.

7.

Quality of life following proximal femoral replacement using a modular system in revision THA.

Al-Taki MM, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Garbuz DS.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):470-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1522-2.

8.

Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Wetters NG, Murray TG, Moric M, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG, Della Valle CJ.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb;471(2):410-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2561-7.

9.

Femoral head size and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene at 5 to 8 years.

Lachiewicz PF, Heckman DS, Soileau ES, Mangla J, Martell JM.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Dec;467(12):3290-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1038-9. Epub 2009 Aug 19.

10.

Risk factors for revision of hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 30 years.

Girard J, Glorion C, Bonnomet F, Fron D, Migaud H.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr;469(4):1141-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1669-x. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

11.

Efficacy of revision surgery for the dislocating total hip arthroplasty: report from a large community registry.

Salassa T, Hoeffel D, Mehle S, Tatman P, Gioe TJ.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Mar;472(3):962-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3344-5. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

12.

Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Howie DW, Holubowycz OT, Middleton R; Large Articulation Study Group.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jun 20;94(12):1095-102. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00570.

PMID:
22717828
13.

Is a cementless dual mobility socket in primary THA a reasonable option?

Hamadouche M, Arnould H, Bouxin B.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov;470(11):3048-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2395-3.

14.

The 2012 John Charnley Award: Clinical multicenter studies of the wear performance of highly crosslinked remelted polyethylene in THA.

Bragdon CR, Doerner M, Martell J, Jarrett B, Palm H; Multicenter Study Group, Malchau H.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb;471(2):393-402. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2604-0.

15.

The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation.

Hamadouche M, Biau DJ, Huten D, Musset T, Gaucher F.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Dec;468(12):3248-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1404-7.

16.

Modular femoral stems for revision total hip arthroplasty.

Restrepo C, Mashadi M, Parvizi J, Austin MS, Hozack WJ.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):476-82. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1561-8.

17.

What is the prognosis of revision total hip arthroplasty in patients 55 years and younger?

Adelani MA, Crook K, Barrack RL, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 May;472(5):1518-25. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3377-9. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

18.

Delta ceramic-on-alumina ceramic articulation in primary THA: prospective, randomized FDA-IDE study and retrieval analysis.

Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Seng BE, Clarke IC, Adams JB.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):367-74. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1143-9.

19.

Is there a risk in placing a ceramic head on a previously implanted trunion?

Hannouche D, Delambre J, Zadegan F, Sedel L, Nizard R.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Dec;468(12):3322-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1505-3.

20.

Decreased dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty using larger femoral head size and posterior capsular repair.

Hummel MT, Malkani AL, Yakkanti MR, Baker DL.

J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6 Suppl):73-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.026. Epub 2009 Jul 4.

PMID:
19577890
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk