Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 132

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 22035764)

1.

Gleason pattern 5 is frequently underdiagnosed on prostate needle-core biopsy.

Al-Hussain TO, Nagar MS, Epstein JI.

Urology. 2012 Jan;79(1):178-81. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.060. Epub 2011 Oct 27.

PMID:
22035764
2.

Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade in academic and community settings.

Steinberg DM, Sauvageot J, Piantadosi S, Epstein JI.

Am J Surg Pathol. 1997 May;21(5):566-76.

PMID:
9158682
3.

A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score.

Fine SW, Epstein JI.

J Urol. 2008 Apr;179(4):1335-8; discussion 1338-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.057. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

PMID:
18289601
4.

Factors predicting prostatic biopsy Gleason sum under grading.

Stackhouse DA, Sun L, Schroeck FR, Jayachandran J, Caire AA, Acholo CO, Robertson CN, Albala DM, Polascik TJ, Donatucci CF, Maloney KE, Moul JW.

J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):118-22; discussion 123-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.127. Epub 2009 May 17.

PMID:
19447436
5.

Identification of Gleason pattern 5 on prostatic needle core biopsy: frequency of underdiagnosis and relation to morphology.

Fajardo DA, Miyamoto H, Miller JS, Lee TK, Epstein JI.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2011 Nov;35(11):1706-11. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318228571d.

PMID:
21997691
6.

Should intervening benign tissue be included in the measurement of discontinuous foci of cancer on prostate needle biopsy? Correlation with radical prostatectomy findings.

Karram S, Trock BJ, Netto GJ, Epstein JI.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2011 Sep;35(9):1351-5. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182217b79.

PMID:
21836493
7.

The independent impact of extended pattern biopsy on prostate cancer stage migration.

Master VA, Chi T, Simko JP, Weinberg V, Carroll PR.

J Urol. 2005 Nov;174(5):1789-93; discussion 1793.

PMID:
16217288
8.

The value of second-opinion pathology diagnoses on prostate biopsies from patients referred for management of prostate cancer.

Barqawi AB, Turcanu R, Gamito EJ, Lucia SM, O'Donnell CI, Crawford ED, La Rosa DD, La Rosa FG.

Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2011 Jun 20;4(5):468-75. Epub 2011 Jun 12.

9.

Should a Gleason score be assigned to a minute focus of carcinoma on prostate biopsy?

Rubin MA, Dunn R, Kambham N, Misick CP, O'Toole KM.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2000 Dec;24(12):1634-40.

PMID:
11117784
10.

The value of mandatory second opinion pathology review of prostate needle biopsy interpretation before radical prostatectomy.

Brimo F, Schultz L, Epstein JI.

J Urol. 2010 Jul;184(1):126-30. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.021. Epub 2010 May 15.

PMID:
20478583
11.
12.

Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.

King CR, McNeal JE, Gill H, Presti JC Jr.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):386-91.

PMID:
15145152
13.
14.

Correlation between the Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens.

Shen BY, Tsui KH, Chang PL, Chuang CK, Hsieh ML, Huang ST, Wang TM, Lee SH, Huang HC, Huang SC.

Chang Gung Med J. 2003 Dec;26(12):919-24.

16.

Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade.

Tan N, Lane BR, Li J, Moussa AS, Soriano M, Jones JS.

J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.022. Epub 2008 Aug 15.

PMID:
18707706
18.

Increased accuracy of biopsy Gleason score obtained by extended needle biopsy.

Emiliozzi P, Maymone S, Paterno A, Scarpone P, Amini M, Proietti G, Cordahi M, Pansadoro V.

J Urol. 2004 Dec;172(6 Pt 1):2224-6.

PMID:
15538236
19.

Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.

Grober ED, Tsihlias J, Jewett MA, Sweet JM, Evans AJ, Trachtenberg J, Robinette M, Nam RK.

Can J Urol. 2004 Feb;11(1):2157-62.

PMID:
15003158
20.

Multiple prostate cancer cores with different Gleason grades submitted in the same specimen container without specific site designation: should each core be assigned an individual Gleason score?

Kunju LP, Daignault S, Wei JT, Shah RB.

Hum Pathol. 2009 Apr;40(4):558-64. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.07.020. Epub 2009 Jan 13.

PMID:
19144380
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk