Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 167

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 21988777)


18O-labeled proteome reference as global internal standards for targeted quantification by selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry.

Kim JS, Fillmore TL, Liu T, Robinson E, Hossain M, Champion BL, Moore RJ, Camp DG 2nd, Smith RD, Qian WJ.

Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Dec;10(12):M110.007302. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.007302. Epub 2011 Oct 11.


Large-scale multiplexed quantitative discovery proteomics enabled by the use of an (18)O-labeled "universal" reference sample.

Qian WJ, Liu T, Petyuk VA, Gritsenko MA, Petritis BO, Polpitiya AD, Kaushal A, Xiao W, Finnerty CC, Jeschke MG, Jaitly N, Monroe ME, Moore RJ, Moldawer LL, Davis RW, Tompkins RG, Herndon DN, Camp DG, Smith RD; Inflammation and the Host Response to Injury Large Scale Collaborative Research Program.

J Proteome Res. 2009 Jan;8(1):290-9. doi: 10.1021/pr800467r.


Combination of improved (18)O incorporation and multiple reaction monitoring: a universal strategy for absolute quantitative verification of serum candidate biomarkers of liver cancer.

Zhao Y, Jia W, Sun W, Jin W, Guo L, Wei J, Ying W, Zhang Y, Xie Y, Jiang Y, He F, Qian X.

J Proteome Res. 2010 Jun 4;9(6):3319-27. doi: 10.1021/pr9011969.


High-sensitivity LC-MS/MS quantification of peptides and proteins in complex biological samples: the impact of enzymatic digestion and internal standard selection on method performance.

Bronsema KJ, Bischoff R, van de Merbel NC.

Anal Chem. 2013 Oct 15;85(20):9528-35. doi: 10.1021/ac4015116. Epub 2013 Sep 25.


Use of stable isotope dimethyl labeling coupled to selected reaction monitoring to enhance throughput by multiplexing relative quantitation of targeted proteins.

Aye TT, Low TY, Bjørlykke Y, Barsnes H, Heck AJ, Berven FS.

Anal Chem. 2012 Jun 5;84(11):4999-5006. doi: 10.1021/ac300596r. Epub 2012 May 15.


Enhanced sensitivity for selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics using a dual stage electrodynamic ion funnel interface.

Hossain M, Kaleta DT, Robinson EW, Liu T, Zhao R, Page JS, Kelly RT, Moore RJ, Tang K, Camp DG 2nd, Qian WJ, Smith RD.

Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Feb;10(2):M000062-MCP201. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M000062-MCP201. Epub 2010 Apr 21.


Relative quantification of serum proteins from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients by stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Wehr AY, Hwang WT, Blair IA, Yu KH.

J Proteome Res. 2012 Mar 2;11(3):1749-58. doi: 10.1021/pr201011f. Epub 2012 Feb 15.


Interlaboratory evaluation of automated, multiplexed peptide immunoaffinity enrichment coupled to multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for quantifying proteins in plasma.

Kuhn E, Whiteaker JR, Mani DR, Jackson AM, Zhao L, Pope ME, Smith D, Rivera KD, Anderson NL, Skates SJ, Pearson TW, Paulovich AG, Carr SA.

Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012 Jun;11(6):M111.013854. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.013854. Epub 2011 Dec 22.


Quantitative, multiplexed assays for low abundance proteins in plasma by targeted mass spectrometry and stable isotope dilution.

Keshishian H, Addona T, Burgess M, Kuhn E, Carr SA.

Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007 Dec;6(12):2212-29. Epub 2007 Oct 15.


Hyperplex-MRM: a hybrid multiple reaction monitoring method using mTRAQ/iTRAQ labeling for multiplex absolute quantification of human colorectal cancer biomarker.

Yin HR, Zhang L, Xie LQ, Huang LY, Xu Y, Cai SJ, Yang PY, Lu HJ.

J Proteome Res. 2013 Sep 6;12(9):3912-9. doi: 10.1021/pr4005025. Epub 2013 Aug 16.


Precision of heavy-light peptide ratios measured by maldi-tof mass spectrometry.

Anderson NL, Razavi M, Pearson TW, Kruppa G, Paape R, Suckau D.

J Proteome Res. 2012 Mar 2;11(3):1868-78. doi: 10.1021/pr201092v. Epub 2012 Feb 3.


A method for calculating 16O/18O peptide ion ratios for the relative quantification of proteomes.

Johnson KL, Muddiman DC.

J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2004 Apr;15(4):437-45.


Multi-peptide nLC-PC-IDMS-SRM-based assay for the quantification of biomarkers in the chicken ovarian cancer model.

Andrews Kingon GL, Petitte JN, Muddiman DC, Hawkridge AM.

Methods. 2013 Jun 15;61(3):323-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Apr 19.


Combination of gas-phase fractionation and MS³ acquisition modes for relative protein quantification with isobaric tagging.

Dayon L, Sonderegger B, Kussmann M.

J Proteome Res. 2012 Oct 5;11(10):5081-9. doi: 10.1021/pr300519c. Epub 2012 Sep 14.


Plasma proteome response to severe burn injury revealed by 18O-labeled "universal" reference-based quantitative proteomics.

Qian WJ, Petritis BO, Kaushal A, Finnerty CC, Jeschke MG, Monroe ME, Moore RJ, Schepmoes AA, Xiao W, Moldawer LL, Davis RW, Tompkins RG, Herndon DN, Camp DG 2nd, Smith RD; Inflammation and the Host Response to Injury Large Scale Collaborative Research Program.

J Proteome Res. 2010 Sep 3;9(9):4779-89. doi: 10.1021/pr1005026.


Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis.

Gillet LC, Navarro P, Tate S, Röst H, Selevsek N, Reiter L, Bonner R, Aebersold R.

Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012 Jun;11(6):O111.016717. doi: 10.1074/mcp.O111.016717. Epub 2012 Jan 18.


Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry approach for quantification of mucins from sputum using 13C,15N-labeled peptides as internal standards.

Lindberg C, van Geest M, Lindberg H, Kjellström S.

Anal Biochem. 2013 Mar 1;434(1):84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2012.10.033. Epub 2012 Nov 5.

Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk