Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 118

1.

Single-cell copy number variation detection.

Cheng J, Vanneste E, Konings P, Voet T, Vermeesch JR, Moreau Y.

Genome Biol. 2011 Aug 29;12(8):R80. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-8-r80.

2.

Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.

Kloth JN, Oosting J, van Wezel T, Szuhai K, Knijnenburg J, Gorter A, Kenter GG, Fleuren GJ, Jordanova ES.

BMC Genomics. 2007 Feb 20;8:53.

3.

Detection of novel amplicons in prostate cancer by comprehensive genomic profiling of prostate cancer cell lines using oligonucleotide-based arrayCGH.

Kamradt J, Jung V, Wahrheit K, Tolosi L, Rahnenfuehrer J, Schilling M, Walker R, Davis S, Stoeckle M, Meltzer P, Wullich B.

PLoS One. 2007 Aug 22;2(8):e769.

4.

The use of ultra-dense array CGH analysis for the discovery of micro-copy number alterations and gene fusions in the cancer genome.

Przybytkowski E, Ferrario C, Basik M.

BMC Med Genomics. 2011 Jan 27;4:16. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-16.

5.

Evaluation of the efficacy of constitutional array-based comparative genomic hybridization in the diagnosis of aneuploidy using genomic and amplified DNA.

Tan NH, Palmer R, Wang R.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010 Feb;36(1):19-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01110.x.

PMID:
20178523
6.

Density matters: comparison of array platforms for detection of copy-number variation and copy-neutral abnormalities.

Mason-Suares H, Kim W, Grimmett L, Williams ES, Horner VL, Kunig D, Goldlust IS, Wu BL, Shen Y, Miller DT, Martin CL, Rudd MK.

Genet Med. 2013 Sep;15(9):706-12. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.36. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

PMID:
23558256
7.

Gene expression profiling and gene copy-number changes in malignant mesothelioma cell lines.

Zanazzi C, Hersmus R, Veltman IM, Gillis AJ, van Drunen E, Beverloo HB, Hegmans JP, Verweij M, Lambrecht BN, Oosterhuis JW, Looijenga LH.

Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2007 Oct;46(10):895-908.

PMID:
17620293
8.

Concurrent whole-genome haplotyping and copy-number profiling of single cells.

Zamani Esteki M, Dimitriadou E, Mateiu L, Melotte C, Van der Aa N, Kumar P, Das R, Theunis K, Cheng J, Legius E, Moreau Y, Debrock S, D'Hooghe T, Verdyck P, De Rycke M, Sermon K, Vermeesch JR, Voet T.

Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Jun 4;96(6):894-912. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 May 14.

9.

Single-nucleotide polymorphism array coupled with multiple displacement amplification: accuracy and spatial resolution for analysis of chromosome copy numbers in few cells.

Ling J, Deng Y, Long X, Liu J, Du H, Cao B, Xu K.

Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2012 Jan-Feb;59(1):35-44. doi: 10.1002/bab.64. Epub 2011 Nov 27.

PMID:
22332743
10.

A statistical change point model approach for the detection of DNA copy number variations in array CGH data.

Chen J, Wang YP.

IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2009 Oct-Dec;6(4):529-41. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2008.129.

11.

A robust method to analyze copy number alterations of less than 100 kb in single cells using oligonucleotide array CGH.

Möhlendick B, Bartenhagen C, Behrens B, Honisch E, Raba K, Knoefel WT, Stoecklein NH.

PLoS One. 2013 Jun 25;8(6):e67031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067031. Print 2013.

12.

Normalization of Illumina Infinium whole-genome SNP data improves copy number estimates and allelic intensity ratios.

Staaf J, Vallon-Christersson J, Lindgren D, Juliusson G, Rosenquist R, Höglund M, Borg A, Ringnér M.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Oct 2;9:409. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-409.

13.

PAIR: paired allelic log-intensity-ratio-based normalization method for SNP-CGH arrays.

Yang S, Pounds S, Zhang K, Fang Z.

Bioinformatics. 2013 Feb 1;29(3):299-307. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts683. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

14.

Chromosomal localization of DNA amplifications in neuroblastoma tumors using cDNA microarray comparative genomic hybridization.

Beheshti B, Braude I, Marrano P, Thorner P, Zielenska M, Squire JA.

Neoplasia. 2003 Jan-Feb;5(1):53-62.

15.

Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization technologies across microarray platforms.

Hester SD, Reid L, Nowak N, Jones WD, Parker JS, Knudtson K, Ward W, Tiesman J, Denslow ND.

J Biomol Tech. 2009 Apr;20(2):135-51.

16.

High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.

Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D, Collins C, Kuo WL, Chen C, Zhai Y, Dairkee SH, Ljung BM, Gray JW, Albertson DG.

Nat Genet. 1998 Oct;20(2):207-11.

PMID:
9771718
17.

Assessing the significance of conserved genomic aberrations using high resolution genomic microarrays.

Guttman M, Mies C, Dudycz-Sulicz K, Diskin SJ, Baldwin DA, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Grant GR.

PLoS Genet. 2007 Aug;3(8):e143.

18.

A statistical approach for array CGH data analysis.

Picard F, Robin S, Lavielle M, Vaisse C, Daudin JJ.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Feb 11;6:27.

19.

A GC-wave correction algorithm that improves the analytical performance of aCGH.

Leo A, Walker AM, Lebo MS, Hendrickson B, Scholl T, Akmaev VR.

J Mol Diagn. 2012 Nov;14(6):550-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

PMID:
22922130
20.

CGHPRO -- a comprehensive data analysis tool for array CGH.

Chen W, Erdogan F, Ropers HH, Lenzner S, Ullmann R.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 5;6:85.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk