Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 109

1.
2.
3.

Predicting health-utility scores from the Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire in a multicenter nationwide study of anterior cervical spine surgery.

Skolasky RL, Carreon LY, Anderson PA, Albert TJ, Riley LH 3rd.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25):2211-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318202a403.

PMID:
21343870
4.

Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis.

Glassman SD, Copay AG, Berven SH, Polly DW, Subach BR, Carreon LY.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep;90(9):1839-47. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01095.

PMID:
18762642
5.
6.

Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.

Parker SL, Godil SS, Shau DN, Mendenhall SK, McGirt MJ.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Feb;18(2):154-60. doi: 10.3171/2012.10.SPINE12312. Epub 2012 Nov 23.

PMID:
23176164
7.

The duration of symptoms and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy.

Burneikiene S, Nelson EL, Mason A, Rajpal S, Villavicencio AT.

Spine J. 2015 Mar 1;15(3):427-32. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Sep 28.

PMID:
25264315
8.

Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.

Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid RW Jr, Mummaneni PV.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):516-28. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13996. Epub 2014 Jul 18.

PMID:
25036218
9.

Outcome of lumbar arthrodesis in patients sixty-five years of age or older. Surgical technique.

Glassman SD, Carreon L, Dimar JR.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Mar;92 Suppl 1 Pt 1:77-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01300.

PMID:
20194346
10.

Measuring surgical outcomes in subaxial degenerative cervical spine disease patients: minimum clinically important difference as a tool for determining meaningful clinical improvement.

Auffinger B, Lam S, Shen J, Roitberg BZ.

Neurosurgery. 2014 Feb;74(2):206-13; discussion 213-4. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000247.

PMID:
24220005
11.

Artificial discs for lumbar and cervical degenerative disc disease -update: an evidence-based analysis.

Health Quality Ontario.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(10):1-98. Epub 2006 Apr 1.

12.

Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.

Godil SS, Parker SL, Zuckerman SL, Mendenhall SK, McGirt MJ.

Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.444. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

PMID:
24076442
13.

The likelihood of reaching minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at 2 years following a 3-column osteotomy: analysis of 140 patients.

Fakurnejad S, Scheer JK, Lafage V, Smith JS, Deviren V, Hostin R, Mundis GM Jr, Burton DC, Klineberg E, Gupta M, Kebaish K, Shaffrey CI, Bess S, Schwab F, Ames CP; International Spine Study Group.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):340-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE141031. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

PMID:
26091440
14.

Patient-Specific Factors Associated With Dissatisfaction After Elective Surgery for Degenerative Spine Diseases.

Chotai S, Sivaganesan A, Parker SL, McGirt MJ, Devin CJ.

Neurosurgery. 2015 Aug;77(2):157-63; discussion 163. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000768.

PMID:
25910085
15.
16.

Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Parker SL, Adogwa O, Paul AR, Anderson WN, Aaronson O, Cheng JS, McGirt MJ.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 May;14(5):598-604. doi: 10.3171/2010.12.SPINE10472. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

PMID:
21332281
17.

The development of a model for translation of the Neck Disability Index to utility scores for cost-utility analysis in cervical disorders.

Richardson SS, Berven S.

Spine J. 2012 Jan;12(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.12.002. Epub 2011 Dec 29.

PMID:
22209244
18.

Factor analysis of the North American Spine Society outcome assessment instrument: a study based on a spine registry of patients treated with lumbar and cervical disc arthroplasty.

Aghayev E, Elfering A, Schizas C, Mannion AF; SWISSSpine Registry Group.

Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):916-24. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.446. Epub 2013 Nov 5.

PMID:
24200412
19.

Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, Heller JG.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Sep 21;93(18):1684-92. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00476.

PMID:
21938372
20.

Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.

Matgé G, Berthold C, Gunness VR, Hana A, Hertel F.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Mar;22(3):237-45. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131089. Epub 2015 Jan 2.

PMID:
25555050
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk