Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.

Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, Carpenter J, Rücker G, Harbord RM, Schmid CH, Tetzlaff J, Deeks JJ, Peters J, Macaskill P, Schwarzer G, Duval S, Altman DG, Moher D, Higgins JP.

BMJ. 2011 Jul 22;343:d4002. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4002. No abstract available.

PMID:
21784880
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis.

Tang JL, Liu JL.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 May;53(5):477-84.

PMID:
10812319
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.

Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C.

BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34.

PMID:
9310563
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
4.

Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey.

Ahmed I, Sutton AJ, Riley RD.

BMJ. 2012 Jan 3;344:d7762. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7762.

PMID:
22214758
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
5.

Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis.

Sterne JA, Egger M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;54(10):1046-55.

PMID:
11576817
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.

Biljana M, Jelena M, Branislav J, Milorad R.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 1999;68:323-8.

PMID:
10724898
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Asymmetry in funnel plot.

Kaneda H.

Am J Cardiol. 2011 Jul 15;108(2):330-1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.04.004. No abstract available.

PMID:
21712109
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.

Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Sep;58(9):894-901.

PMID:
16085192
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis.

Williamson PR, Gamble C.

Stat Med. 2005 May 30;24(10):1547-61. Review.

PMID:
15580591
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints.

Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JA.

Stat Med. 2006 Oct 30;25(20):3443-57.

PMID:
16345038
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Leucht S, Kissling W, Davis JM.

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Jun;119(6):443-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01388.x. Review.

PMID:
19469725
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

The case of the misleading funnel plot.

Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Schmid CH, Olkin I.

BMJ. 2006 Sep 16;333(7568):597-600. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
16974018
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
13.

Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.

Rücker G, Carpenter JR, Schwarzer G.

Biom J. 2011 Mar;53(2):351-68. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201000151. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

PMID:
21374698
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.

Bennett DA, Latham NK, Stretton C, Anderson CS.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Apr;57(4):349-57.

PMID:
15135835
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

How to interpret meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials.

Nieri M, Glenny AM, Worthington H, Esposito M.

Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009 Spring;2(1):61-6. Erratum in: Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009 Summer;2(2):151.

PMID:
20467619
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed.

Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Sep;58(9):882-93.

PMID:
16085191
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.

Song F, Khan KS, Dinnes J, Sutton AJ.

Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):88-95.

PMID:
11914301
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
18.
19.

Modelling multiple sources of dissemination bias in meta-analysis.

Bowden J, Jackson D, Thompson SG.

Stat Med. 2010 Mar 30;29(7-8):945-55. doi: 10.1002/sim.3813.

PMID:
20213702
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough.

Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH.

Lancet. 1998 Jan 10;351(9096):123-7.

PMID:
9439507
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk