Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

Extensive composite molar restorations: 3 years clinical evaluation.

Laegreid T, Gjerdet NR, Johansson AK.

Acta Odontol Scand. 2012 Jul;70(4):344-52. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.603355. Epub 2011 Jul 25.

PMID:
21780983
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.

Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M.

J Dent. 2007 Feb;35(2):124-9. Epub 2006 Sep 7.

PMID:
16956709
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Clinical evaluation of the posterior composite Quixfil in class I and II cavities: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Manhart J, Chen HY, Hickel R.

J Adhes Dent. 2010 Jun;12(3):237-43. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a17551.

PMID:
20157663
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.

van Dijken JW.

J Dent. 2010 Jun;38(6):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Mar 1.

PMID:
20193727
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.

van Dijken JW.

J Dent. 2000 Jul;28(5):299-306.

PMID:
10785294
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

One-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth.

Cetin AR, Unlu N.

Dent Mater J. 2009 Sep;28(5):620-6.

PMID:
19822994
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
7.

Four-year evaluation of a resin composite including nanofillers in posterior cavities.

Schirrmeister JF, Huber K, Hellwig E, Hahn P.

J Adhes Dent. 2009 Oct;11(5):399-404.

PMID:
19841767
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.

Mendonça JS, Neto RG, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Navarro MF, de Carvalho RM.

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010 May 1;11(3):025-32.

PMID:
20461321
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations.

Köhler B, Rasmusson CG, Odman P.

J Dent. 2000 Feb;28(2):111-6.

PMID:
10666968
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.

Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R.

J Adhes Dent. 2001 Summer;3(2):185-94.

PMID:
11570687
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.

van Dijken JW, Kieri C, Carlén M.

J Dent Res. 1999 Jul;78(7):1319-25.

PMID:
10403459
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer, nanohybrid and nanofill composite restorative systems in posterior teeth.

Mahmoud SH, El-Embaby AE, AbdAllah AM, Hamama HH.

J Adhes Dent. 2008 Aug;10(4):315-22.

PMID:
18792703
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

The influence of approximal restoration extension on the development of secondary caries.

Kuper NK, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Huysmans MC.

J Dent. 2012 Mar;40(3):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.12.014. Epub 2011 Dec 27.

PMID:
22226997
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings.

Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KL.

J Dent. 1998 May;26(4):311-7.

PMID:
9611936
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.

da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguércio AD, Demarco FF.

J Dent. 2006 Aug;34(7):427-35. Epub 2005 Nov 28.

PMID:
16314023
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.

Sadeghi M, Lynch CD, Shahamat N.

J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Jul;37(7):532-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02073.x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

PMID:
20202097
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

A six-year prospective randomized study of a nano-hybrid and a conventional hybrid resin composite in Class II restorations.

van Dijken JW, Pallesen U.

Dent Mater. 2013 Feb;29(2):191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Oct 9.

PMID:
23063254
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

A clinical evaluation of Class II composites placed using a decoupling technique.

Wilson NH, Cowan AJ, Unterbrink G, Wilson MA, Crisp RJ.

J Adhes Dent. 2000 Winter;2(4):319-29.

PMID:
11317379
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations.

Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA.

J Adhes Dent. 2007 Oct;9(5):469-75.

PMID:
18297828
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Noncarious class V lesions restored with a polyacid modified resin composite and a nanocomposite: a two-year clinical trial.

Türkün LS, Celik EU.

J Adhes Dent. 2008 Oct;10(5):399-405.

PMID:
19058687
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk